首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Replying to our Christmas "good guru guide", Peter Drucker, the grand old man of management theory, speculated that the word "gu
Replying to our Christmas "good guru guide", Peter Drucker, the grand old man of management theory, speculated that the word "gu
admin
2013-05-20
57
问题
Replying to our Christmas "good guru guide", Peter Drucker, the grand old man of management theory, speculated that the word "guru" had become popular only because "charlatan" was too long a word for most headlines. Few people are easier to ridicule than management gums. Irrepressible self-publicists and slavish fashion-merchants, they make a splendid living out of recycling other people’s ideas ("chaos management"), coining euphemisms ("downsizing") and laboring the obvious ("managing by wandering around" or the customer is king"). Their books draw heavily on particular case studies — often out-of-date ones that have nasty knack of collapsing later. And their ideas change quickly. Tom Peters, once a self-confessed sycophant to the corporate behemoth is now an apostle of the small, chaotic, "virtual" organization.
Gurus do have their uses, however. Begin with the circumstantial evidence. In America, where management theories are treated with undue reverence, business is bouncing back. In Germany, where business schools hardly exist and management theory is widely seen as an oxymoron, many companies are in trouble. German business magazines are suddenly brimming with articles about "downsizing" and "business process re-engineering" In Japan firms are once again turning to business theories from America — just as their fathers learnt after the Second World War from American quality-control techniques. Coincidence does not prove causation: American firms were just as much in love with gurus when they were doing badly. But the fact that Germans and Japanese are paying attention again does offer some clues. The most important point in favor of management theories is that they are on the side of change. In 1927 a group of psychologists studying productivity at Western Electric’s Hawthorne factory in Illinois found that workers increased their output whenever the level of lighting was changed, up or down. At the very least, theorists can make change easier by identifying problems, acting as scapegoats for managers — or simply making people think. A vested interest in change can lead to faddism. But, taken with a requisite dose of scepticism, it can be fine complacency-shaker.
A second argument for gurus relates to knowledge. The best management theorists collect a lot of information about what makes firms successful. This varies from the highly technical, such as how to discount future cash flow, to softer organizational theories. Few would dispute the usefulness of the first. It is in the second area — the land of "flat hierarchies" and "multi-functional teams" — that gurus have most often stumbled against or contradicted each other. This knowledge is not obviously providing a strategic recipe for success: there are too many variables in business, and if all competitors used the same recipe it would automatically cease to work. But it does provide something managers want: information about, and understanding of, other companies experience in trying out tactics — thinner management structures, handing power to workers, performance-related pay, or whatever.
A good analogy may be with diets. There is no such thing as the "correct" diet, but it is clear that some foods, in some quantities, arc better for you than others: and it is also likely that the main virtue of following a diet is not what you eat but the fact that it forces you to think about it. If management diets come with a lot of hype and some snake-oil, so be it.
Which of the following titles is the most appropriate for the passage?
选项
A、In Defense of the Guru
B、A Sharp Word for the Guru
C、The Weakness of the Guru
D、Gurus — a Guarantee for Success
答案
A
解析
主旨大意题,问4个选项中哪个最适合做文章的标题。这是一种主旨题的变体,问文章标题实际上就是问文章主旨,最符合主旨的标题就是答案。本文的主旨是第二段的第一句话(详见文章大意)“尽管如此,专家还是有其用的。”4个选项比较而言,A“为专家辩护”最合适,故为正解。B“对专家之批判”和C“专家之缺陷”都是文章中矛盾的次要方面,与主题不符,错。D“专家——成功之保障”程度过了,文章只承认专家有点用,但用处有多大并没提,更没上升到成功之保障的高度,故放弃。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lH4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Lazinessisasin,everyoneknowsthat.Wehaveprobablyallhad1.______lecturespointingoutthatlazinessisimmoral,thati
Fewpeoplerealizethatgettingpregnantcanmeanlosingyourjob.Imagineawomanwho,sevenmonthsintoherpregnancy,isfir
Fewpeoplerealizethatgettingpregnantcanmeanlosingyourjob.Imagineawomanwho,sevenmonthsintoherpregnancy,isfir
WithallthefussoverObamaandRomney’sduellingspeechesabouttheeconomyinOhioyesterday,anintriguingpoliticalyarnha
Madrid—ItwasnomistakethatuniversitycampusesproliferatedduringSpain’sdecade-long,construction-ledboomyears.Educatio
WhenFuatEcerdecidedtogobacktoschoolforanM.B.A.afterthreeandahalfyearsworkingasaconsultant,hewantedtobe
Accordingtopredicationanalysis,thepredicationsof"Tomhatessoup."and"Itiscool."arerespectively_____and_____.
WhichofthefollowingisNOTthebestcomedybyOscarWilde?
TheBritishEmpireendedin______.
在洛杉矶,一位美国朋友开车带我去看富人区。富人区就是有钱人的聚居地。美国人喜欢陪客人看富人区,好似观光。在我面前是千姿百态的房子和庭院,优雅、宁静、舒适,真如人间天堂。我忽然有个问题问他:“你们看到富人们住在这么漂亮的房子里,会不会嫉妒?”我这位
随机试题
A.TodaysocialistChinaisstandingrock-firmintheEast,orientedtowardmodernization,theworldandthefuture.B.Thegrea
16,WoodmanRoad,TwoBridges,
下列关于非持续性室速临床表现的描述正确的是
思维奔逸
(2013年国家司法考试真题)关于法院的送达行为,下列哪一选项是正确的?()
应收部门的员工从远程终端输入运货的信息,无意间遗漏了采购单证的号码。能够检测出该差错的最佳系统控制方法是
农业增收是确保国家粮食安全的基础支撑,是突破资源环境约束的必然选择,是加快现代农业建设的决定力量,具有显著的公共性、基础性、社会性。()
“知我者谓我心忧,不知我者谓我何求”。下列诗句中,表达感情与其不同的是()。
请将如下程序补充完整,使得输出结果为:bbaa#include<iostream>usingnamespacestd;classA{public:【】{cout<<"aa";}
ThenumberofwomendirectorsappointedtocorporateboardsintheUnitedStateshasincreaseddramatically,buttheratiooffe
最新回复
(
0
)