首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
172
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
Which of the following is NOT the reason of inadequacy of interview?
选项
A、Halo effect.
B、Primacy effect.
C、Contrast effect.
D、Cognitive effect.
答案
D
解析
本题是细节题。文章的前3段分别阐述了面试考官容易受到的3种心理因素的影响,即光圈效应、首位效应和对比效应。而认知效应并不是影响考官判断偏差的心理因素。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,personneldirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Mr.Cousinsgotsickafterreturningfrom______.Whatdidn’tMr.Cousinsdoinhisexperimentswithlaughter?
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Hamstershavesleepingproblems.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Scientistsarecrueltodoexperimentswithhamsters.
随机试题
Twohundredyearsago,AmericanstudentswenttoAmericanschools.Likeyou,theystudiedarithmetic,spellingandgeography.Un
男,28岁。2天来解柏油样便6次,今晨昏倒急送入院。以往无上腹部疼痛及肝病史,近期五服药史。体检:血压60/40mmHg(8.0/5.3kPa),脉搏130次/分。应首选的措施是
下列哪项不属于阴虚证的表现()
甲公司通过租赁方式取得一项设备,其公允价值为1950万元,作为管理用固定资产,租赁期开始日为2×16年7月1日,该设备的预计使用年限为4年,合同规定的租赁期为2年,租赁期届满后归还出租方,合同年利率为6%,分别在2×17年和2×18年的6月30日支付租金1
年利率为12%,存款额为1000元,期限为一年,按一年4次按季利率计息,则一年后的本利和为()元。
经济中存在失业时,应采取的财政政策是()。
目前,由于国内市场的奢侈品大多是国外品牌,而我国的高档消费品刚刚起步,几乎没有响当当的世界奢侈品品牌,倘若现在再进一步降低同类商品的税负,不但会让我国的奢侈品生产企业举步维艰,产生巨大的行业冲击,也会让国外奢侈品占据更大的市场份额。取消或降低国外奢侈品的消
职位权力
Thereneedstobeabalancebetweentheneedsof______livingindevelopedenvironmentsandthepreservationofnaturalhabitat
A、Baconandchicken.B、Mushroomsandbeef.C、Pineappleandham.D、Onionsandpork.C对话中女士说:“我们有意大利式香肠、火腿、蘑菇、洋葱、菠萝、青椒、咸肉和西红柿。”四个选
最新回复
(
0
)