首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
164
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
Which of the following is NOT the reason of inadequacy of interview?
选项
A、Halo effect.
B、Primacy effect.
C、Contrast effect.
D、Cognitive effect.
答案
D
解析
本题是细节题。文章的前3段分别阐述了面试考官容易受到的3种心理因素的影响,即光圈效应、首位效应和对比效应。而认知效应并不是影响考官判断偏差的心理因素。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,personneldirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
JohnWilliams,PersonnelDirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Mr.Cousinsgotsickafterreturningfrom______.Whatdidn’tMr.Cousinsdoinhisexperimentswithlaughter?
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Hamstershavesleepingproblems.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Biologicalclocktellstime.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Scientistsarecrueltodoexperimentswithhamsters.
随机试题
新生儿窒息复苏时最根本的是
患者,女性,34岁,因1个月来发热、乏力、咳嗽,1天来左眼突然失明来院。既往有心脏杂音。查体:体温37.9℃,脉率96次/分,血压128/75mmHg,左眼视力消失,双肺(一),心界不大,心尖部3/6级收缩期吹风样杂音,肝未及,脾肋下可及。化验:Hb96g
甲公司20×7年年初“应交税费——应交增值税”账户的借方余额为250万元,“应交税费——未交增值税”账户的贷方余额为100万元。全年购进货物、接受劳务共支付增值税进项税额1051万元(均通过税务机关的认证、审核),销售货物共收取增值税销项税额4462.5万
银行在进行短期资金交易业务时参与的市场是( )。
社会工作研究者根据既有最低生活保障对象的资料,剖析贫穷形成的原因,为政府完善最低生活保障政策提供依据。在此社会工作研究者采用的是()方法。
小学生意志的独立性、果断性、_______都比较差;中学生在这几方面都迅速发展。
个体通过与社会的互动,形成自己的人格,学会参与社会或群体的方法,掌握社会经验与规范,获得社会成员资格的成长过程被称为()。
在软件生命周期中,能够确定问题有无可行的解决方案的阶段是()。
影响儿童语言发展的因素主要有()
Heatexhaustionisaconditioncausedby______tosunlightoranotherheatsourcewhichoftenresultsindehydrationandsaltd
最新回复
(
0
)