首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
125
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
Which of the following is NOT the reason of inadequacy of interview?
选项
A、Halo effect.
B、Primacy effect.
C、Contrast effect.
D、Cognitive effect.
答案
D
解析
本题是细节题。文章的前3段分别阐述了面试考官容易受到的3种心理因素的影响,即光圈效应、首位效应和对比效应。而认知效应并不是影响考官判断偏差的心理因素。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,personneldirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
JohnWilliams,PersonnelDirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Mr.Cousinsgotsickafterreturningfrom______.Whatdidn’tMr.Cousinsdoinhisexperimentswithlaughter?
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Scientistsarecrueltodoexperimentswithhamsters.
随机试题
医院感染的空气传播方式有
患者,男,64岁。乏力、消瘦2个月。CT检查显示肝左叶5cm大小病灶,增强扫描动脉期病灶出现轻度强化,静脉期病灶强化较明显,病灶远侧胆管扩张,胆总管管壁未见异常强化。手术切除治疗的禁忌证包括1.肿块侵及胆囊2.膈下腹膜多发微小结节灶3.肝门肿大淋
肾盂肾炎最主要的治疗措施是
患者女,56岁,因“先天性心脏病、心房颤动、左侧肢体偏瘫”住院治疗。护士为其测量心率、脉率的正确方法是()
下列违反现金管理制度的是()。
以标准变动成本作为内部转移价格有利于调动供需双方降低成本的积极性。()
张某2011年购置一临街的商铺,财产原值50万元,2017年10月份,其将商铺转让,取得不含增值税转让收入90万元。不考虑交易过程中的其他税费,则张某10月份应缴纳个人所得税的下列计算中,正确的是()。
“学不躐等”体现的教学原则是()
culturalandlinguisticintegritybilingualspeakersnativetonguesmostofA.【T13】______couldusetheirownlanguageB.Whethe
下列叙述中错误的是
最新回复
(
0
)