首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
122
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
Which of the following is NOT the reason of inadequacy of interview?
选项
A、Halo effect.
B、Primacy effect.
C、Contrast effect.
D、Cognitive effect.
答案
D
解析
本题是细节题。文章的前3段分别阐述了面试考官容易受到的3种心理因素的影响,即光圈效应、首位效应和对比效应。而认知效应并不是影响考官判断偏差的心理因素。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,personneldirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
JohnWilliams,PersonnelDirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Hamstershavesleepingproblems.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Biologicalclocktellstime.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.SCNplaysaroleindailyrhythms.
随机试题
申诉者仅限于对机关作出的涉及本人的具体( )决定不服的公务员。
患儿女,8岁。半月前曾因发热、扁桃体发炎住院。昨天突发肉眼血尿,眼睑和下肢水肿,血压136、90mmHg,尿常规:RBC满视野,WBC20个/HP,蛋白(++)与急性肾小球肾炎发病相关的病原菌是
患者,男,16岁,主诉发热头痛半月,右小腿胀痛20天,X线片示右小腿软组织肿胀,内有网状阴影,层次不清,胫骨上端骨质疏松,骨小梁模糊,似有斑点状透亮区。首先诊断为
一胎龄35周,冬季出生的早产儿,因少哭、少吃、少动于生后第3天入院,测体温为27℃(肛),为复温,宜采取的治疗方案为
甲公司出资70%,乙公司出资30%共同设立有限责任公司丙(注册资本2000万元),双方的《投资协议》约定:丙公司董事会成员为三人,第一任董事长由乙公司推荐、财务总监由甲公司推荐;股东拒绝参加股东会会议的,不影响股东会决议的效力。请回答下面问题。
张某盗窃文物一案涉及如下一些证据,其中哪些属于书证?
A、 B、 C、 D、 D
A、 B、 C、 D、 B此题考查的是虚函数的概念。在成员函数的声明前面加上virtual关键字,即可把函数声明为虚函数。虚函数可以是另一个函数的友元函数而不能是静态成员函数。
Fromheradvantagepointshewatchedthemaindoorsswingopenandthefirstarrivalspourin.Thosewhohadbeenattheheadof
A、He’llmissthemeetingthatafternoon.B、He’llhaveanappointmentwiththehost.C、Hewon’tmissthemeeting.D、Heisveryha
最新回复
(
0
)