首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
130
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
All of the following statements about the halo effect are false EXCEPT ______.
选项
A、it is the worst judgmental error
B、it works only when an interviewee dressed smartly and is self-confident
C、it exemplifies how one good characteristic colors perceptions
D、it contributes to the adequacy of interviewing job applicants
答案
C
解析
本题是判断题。由第1段的后半段可以推出:光圈效应意味着如果一个人具有某种显著的优点,这就会影响他人的感知和判断,从而是被认为具有其他并不一定存在的优点。而文中没有提到光圈效应是否是造成最严重的判断错误;一个人穿戴时髦仅仅是产生光圈效应的一个例子;所以A和B错误,应该排除。D与文章所论述的观点恰恰相反,也应该排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,personneldirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Togenerateinterestinitsbusinessgifts,ABCcompanytakesanadintheJulyissueofPersonnelInternational,invitingreade
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Doctorsaresurethatmoretest-tubebabiesaregirlsthanboys.Doctorswillmakemoretest-tubebabyexperiments.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Biologicalclocktellstime.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Thenormalhamstershadadailycycleof24hour,andthem
随机试题
以上情况应考虑哪种可能性如该环位子宫腔底部,你认为哪项处理最合适
全血细胞计数所用的真空采血管的管帽颜色应是
A.饮片品种单一而数量多,库房面积小的B.大宗药材或饮片量较大C.中药或炮制品品种数量多,库房面积大的D.细料、贵重中药或饮片E.各种霉菌、害虫繁殖生长旺季宜采用仓库密封法贮存的是()
在生理性止血过程中有重要作用的是()。
为解决缔约国和其他缔约国国民之间的投资争端,依《关于解决国家和他国国民之间投资争端公约》(以下简称《华盛顿公约》)的规定建立了解决投资争端国际中心。以提供调解和仲裁的便利。有关该公约下对投资争端的仲裁,下述选项中正确的是哪几项?()
[2010年,第93题]某晶体管放大电路的空载放大倍数Ak=-80、输入电阻ri=1kΩ和输出电阻ro=3kΩ,将信号源(uS=10sinωtmV,RS=1kΩ)和负载(RL=5kΩ)接于该放大电路之后(见图7.5.10),负载电压uo将为()。
投保安装工程一切险,安装施工用机械设备的保险金额应按()计算。
冬期施工中配制混凝土用的水泥宜优先采用()的普通硅酸盐水泥。
根据《会计档案管理办法》的规定,企业年度财务报告的保管期限是()。
对制造费用的审计调整建议中,正确的是( )。对于被审计单位经营性租人的固定资产,注册会计师不应专门审查的有( )。
最新回复
(
0
)