首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
101
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
All of the following statements about the halo effect are false EXCEPT ______.
选项
A、it is the worst judgmental error
B、it works only when an interviewee dressed smartly and is self-confident
C、it exemplifies how one good characteristic colors perceptions
D、it contributes to the adequacy of interviewing job applicants
答案
C
解析
本题是判断题。由第1段的后半段可以推出:光圈效应意味着如果一个人具有某种显著的优点,这就会影响他人的感知和判断,从而是被认为具有其他并不一定存在的优点。而文中没有提到光圈效应是否是造成最严重的判断错误;一个人穿戴时髦仅仅是产生光圈效应的一个例子;所以A和B错误,应该排除。D与文章所论述的观点恰恰相反,也应该排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Togenerateinterestinitsbusinessgifts,ABCcompanytakesanadintheJulyissueofPersonnelInternational,invitingreade
JohnWilliams,PersonnelDirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Doctorsaresurethatmoretest-tubebabiesaregirlsthanboys.Doctorswillmakemoretest-tubebabyexperiments.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Scientistsarecrueltodoexperimentswithhamsters.
随机试题
科学心理学的正式诞生,一般公认为始于()。
目前,在我国工业建设中混凝土单层厂房的结构形式主要采用__厂房
A.表虚证B.表实证C.里虚证D.里实证发热,恶风,头项强痛,汗出,脉浮无力,此属
正常人V1~V5导联R波的移行规律是
对基金产品的风险评价,可以由基金销售机构的特定部门完成,也可以由第三方的基金评级与评价机构提供。()应当作为基金销售机构向基金投资人推介基金产品的重要依据。
《中华人民共和国教师法》规定,取得初级中学教师、初级职业学校文化、专业课教师资格,应当具备()。
如果一个人的食物有50%来自绿色植物,30%来自兔和羊,20%来自小型肉食性动物。那么,此人每增加1千克体重,按能量传递效率为10%计算,应消耗绿色植物()。
行政处罚是指行政机关依法对违反行政管理秩序的公民、法人或其他组织给予制裁的行政行为。据此,下列属于“行政处罚”的是()。
设Y=lnX~N(μ,θ2),而X1,….Xn为取自总体X的简单样本,试求EX的最大似然估计.
帧中继技术是在OSI参考模型的第______层上用简化的方法传送和交换数据单元的一种技术。
最新回复
(
0
)