首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly
admin
2015-01-09
68
问题
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly is a controversy that must be taught. "The Darwinists are bluffing, "he says over a plate of oysters at a downtown seafood restaurant. "They have the science of the steam engine era,and it’s not keeping up with the biology of the information age. "
Meyer hands me a recent issue of Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews with an article by Carl Woese.an eminent microbiologist at the University of Illinois. In it. Woese decries the failure of reductionist biology—the tendency to Jook at systems as merely the sum of their parts—to keep up with the developments of molecular biology. Meyer says the conclusion of Woese’s argument is that the Darwinian emperor has no clothes.
It’s a page out of the antievolution playbook: using evolutionary biology’s own literature against it, selectively quoting from the likes of Stephen Jay Gould to illustrate natural selection’s downfalls. The institute marshals Journal articles discussing evolution to provide policymakers with evidence of the raging controversy surrounding the issue.
Woese scoffs at Meyer’s claim when I call to ask him about the paper. "To say that my criticism of Darwinists says that evolutionists have no clothes,"Woese says, "is like saying that Einstein is criticizing Newton,therefore Newtonian physics is wrong". Debates about evolution’s mechanisms,he continues. don’t amount to challenges to the theory. And intelligent design "is not science. It makes no predictions and doesn’t offer any explanation whatsoever, except for’God did it’. "
Of course Meyer happily acknowledges that Woese is an ardent evolutionist. The institute doesn’t need to impress Woese or his peersjit can simply co-opt the vocabulary of science—"academic freedom. " "scientific objectivity,""teach the controversy"—and redirect it to a public trying to reconcile what ap-pear to be two contradictory scientific views. By appealing to a sense of fairness. ID finds a place at the political table,and by merely entering the debate it can claim victory. "We don’t need to win every argu-ment to be a success,"Meyer says,"We’re trying to validate a discussion that’s been long suppressed. "
This is precisely what happened in Ohio. "I’m not a PhD in biology, "says board member Michael Cochran. "But when I have X number of PhD experts telling me this, and X number telling me the opposite, the answer is probably somewhere between the two."
An exasperated Krauss claims that a truly representative debate would have had 10000 pro-evolution Scientists against two Discovery executives. "What these people want is for there to be a debate,"says Krauss. "People in the audience say,Hey,these people sound reasonable. They argue, ’people have different opinions, we should present those opinions in school.’That is nonsense. Some people have opinions that the Holocaust never happened, but we don’t teach that in history. "
Eventually, the Ohio board approved a standard mandating that students learn to "describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory. "Proclaiming victory, Johnson barnstormed Ohio churches soon after notifying congregations of a new, ID-friendly standard. In response, anxious board members added a clause stating that the standard "does not mandate the teaching or testing of intelligent design."Both sides claimed victory. A press release from IDNet trumpeted the mere inclusion of the phrase intelligent design,saying that "the implication of the statement is that the ’teaching or testing of intelligent design’is permitted. "Some pro-evolution scientists, meanwhile,say there’s nothing wrong with teaching students how to scrutinize theory. "I don’t have a problem with that," says Patricia Princehouse.a professor at Case Western Reserve and an outspoken opponent of ID."Critical analysis is exactly what scientists do."
What does Woese mean when he answers back for his remark"...evolutionists have no clothes? "
选项
A、His criticism of Darwinists should not be understood as the denial of it.
B、Clothes themselves are not what evolutionists are interested in.
C、Einstein is right when he is criticizing Newtonian physics.
D、Einsteinian physics is an improvement on Newtonian physics.
答案
D
解析
题目问:当他为自己的言论“……进化论者都没有穿衣服?”进行辩护时,沃斯是什么意思?通过第四段内容可知,说我批评达尔文主义者说进化论者没穿衣服,就如同说爱因斯坦批评了牛顿,因此牛顿的物理学是错误的一样。关于进化机制的争论,并不足以对进化论发起挑战。这段话表明,华斯说这些争论不足以动摇进化论,即虽然爱因斯坦批评牛顿,但是在牛顿理论的基础上更进了一步。所以,答案是D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lWLO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
IntheUnitedStatesandinmanyothercountriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobe【1】aboutdevelopment
IntheUnitedStatesandinmanyothercountriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobe【1】aboutdevelopment
IntheUnitedStatesandinmanyothercountriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobe【1】aboutdevelopment
Mr.Brown’sconditionlooksveryseriousanditisdoubtfulifhewill______.
Today,theTowerofLondonisoneofthemostpopulartourist【1】andattractso-verthreemillionvisitorsayear.Itwasoccasio
Today,theTowerofLondonisoneofthemostpopulartourist【1】andattractso-verthreemillionvisitorsayear.Itwasoccasio
Today,theTowerofLondonisoneofthemostpopulartourist【1】andattractso-verthreemillionvisitorsayear.Itwasoccasio
Seariseasaconsequenceofglobalwarmingwouldimmediatelythreatenthatlargefractionoftheglobelivingatsealevel.Nea
Seariseasaconsequenceofglobalwarmingwouldimmediatelythreatenthatlargefractionoftheglobelivingatsealevel.Nea
随机试题
下列关于支原体肺炎的叙述,不正确的是
男,10岁,“感冒”发热10天后出现眼睑水肿,尿色如茶水。体检:颜面及眼睑均有轻度水肿,血压120/90mmHg(16/12kpa);心肺正常。肝于右肋下1cm,质中硬,轻度压痛:双肾区轻微叩击痛。尿蛋白(++),尿镜检RBC满视野/HP,WBC0~3个
A.测量两侧髂前上棘外缘的距离B.测量两侧髂嵴外缘最宽的距离C.测量两侧坐骨结节内侧缘之间的距离D.测量耻骨联合下缘至骶岬上缘中点间的距离E.测量两侧坐骨棘间径的距离
就使用价值与交换价值相对而言,房地产估价所评估的是房地产的(),但在房地产估价中首先应对房地产的质量、功能、新旧、产权等有关其使用价值的因素进行“鉴定”。就如同对古董、珠宝进行估价,如果不知其真伪、品质,肯定评估不出其真实价值。。
该项目环评大气环境影响评价等级为()。该项目环评大气污染源分析应包含的污染物有()。
国内生产总值的核算方法中收入法要考虑的因素有( )。 ①工资和其他补助;②净利息;③租金收入;④消费支出;⑤资本折旧
从A,B,C,D中找出其画线部分与所给单词画线部分读音相同的选项。clown
(2018·辽宁)历史上第一个明确主张“教育心理学化”的教育家是()
教育投资是效益最大的一种投资。日本、新加坡自然资源都很缺乏,经济发展却很快,最重要的一条就是抓住教育不放。最能准确地复述这段话的意思的是( )。
某工厂生产甲、乙两种产品,生产1公斤甲产品需要煤9公斤、电4°、油3公斤,生产1公斤乙产品需要煤4公斤、电5°、油10公斤。该工厂现有煤360公斤、电200°、油300公斤。已知甲产品每公斤利润为7千元,乙产品每公斤利润为1.2万元,为了获取最大利润应该生
最新回复
(
0
)