首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In the 1939 classic Western " Stagecoach ", a villainous banker with a bag of embezzled cash in his lap frets about the state of
In the 1939 classic Western " Stagecoach ", a villainous banker with a bag of embezzled cash in his lap frets about the state of
admin
2012-01-05
67
问题
In the 1939 classic Western " Stagecoach ", a villainous banker with a bag of embezzled cash in his lap frets about the state of the American economy: "Our national debt is something shocking!" he complains. That year American public debt was just over two-fifths of GDP. This year, the IMF reckons, it will be just over 98% , rising to over 102% in 2012. Were he still around, the unscrupulous banker might have struggled to express his outrage, although he might have found solace in the fact that America’s August 2nd deal to increase the debt ceiling envisages $2.4 trillion in spending cuts but no tax hikes. This strikes many, both outside the United States and within it, as odd. A Democratic congressman called the debt deal a "sugar-coated Satan sandwich".
It does, however, loosely reflect longstanding differences between Americans’ attitudes to taxation and those in much of the rest of the rich world. America is far less inclined than many of its rich-world peers to use taxation and redistribution to reduce inequality. The OECD, a think-tank, reckons that taxation eats up a little less than 30% of the average American’s total compensation, compared with nearly 50% in Germany and France. America’s top federal income-tax rate of 35% is lower than in many other advanced economies (although most Americans also pay state taxes). Britain’s top tax rate is 50%. Swedes and Danes acquiesce to tax rates that would outrage many Americans: Sweden’s top rate is 57% and Denmark’s is 55%. Unsurprisingly, the American state is also less generous to the poor. Unemployment benefits in the United States replace a smaller share of income, and run out more quickly, than in most European countries.
The differences in attitude towards redistributive taxes are not just between countries but also within them, and economists have several explanations as to why. When it comes to differences between countries, social cohesion plays a major role. Broadly speaking, countries that are more ethnically or racially homogeneous are more comfortable with the state seeking to mitigate inequality by transferring some resources from richer to poorer people through the fiscal system. This may explain why Swedes complain less about high taxes than the inhabitants of a country of immigrants such as America. But it also suggests that even societies with a tradition of high taxes ( such as those in Scandinavia) might find that their citizens would become less willing to finance generous welfare programmes were immigrants to make up a greater share of their population. Immigration can also subtly alter the overall attitude towards such matters in another way. A 2008 study by economists at Harvard found evidence that immigrants’ attitudes towards taxation and redistribution were rooted in the places they had left.
Social divisions also play a role in determining who within a society prefers greater redistributive taxation. In America blacks—who are more likely to benefit from welfare programmes than richer whites—are much more favorably disposed towards redistribution through the fiscal system than white people are. A 2001 study looked at over 20 years of data from America’s General Social Survey and found that whereas 47% of blacks thought welfare spending was too low, only 16% of whites did. Only a quarter of blacks thought it was too high, compared with 55% of whites. In general (though not always), those who identify with a group that benefits from redistribution seem to want more of it.
Paradoxically, as the share of the population that receives benefits in a given area rises, support for welfare in the area falls. A new NBER paper finds evidence for an even more intriguing and provocative hypothesis. Its authors note that those near but not at the bottom of the income distribution are often deeply ambivalent about greater redistribution.
Economists have usually explained poor people’s counter-intuitive disdain for something that might make them better off by invoking income mobility. Joe the Plumber might not be making enough to be affected by proposed hikes in tax rates on those making more than $250,000 a year, they argue, but he hopes someday to be one of them. This theory explains some cross-country differences, but it would also predict increased support for redistribution as income inequality widens. Yet the opposite has happened in America, Britain and other rich countries where inequality has risen over the past 30 years.
Instead of opposing redistribution because people expect to make it to the top of the economic ladder, the authors of the new paper argue that people don’t like to be at the bottom. One paradoxical consequence of this "last-place aversion" is that some poor people may be vociferously opposed to the kinds of policies that would actually raise their own income a bit but that might also push those who are poorer than them into comparable or higher positions. The authors ran a series of experiments where students were randomly allotted sums of money, separated by $1, and informed about the "income distribution" that resulted. They were then given another $ 2, which they could give either to the person directly above or below them in the distribution.
In keeping with the notion of "last-place aversion", the people who were a spot away from the bottom were the most likely to give the money to the person above them: rewarding the "rich" but ensuring that someone remained poorer than themselves. Those not at risk of becoming the poorest did not seem to mind falling a notch in the distribution of income nearly as much. This idea is backed up by survey data from America collected by Pew, a polling company: those who earned just a bit more than the minimum wage were the most resistant to increasing it.
Poverty may be miserable. But being able to feel a bit better-off than someone else makes it a bit more bearable.
According to the passage, why do people near but not at the bottom of the income distribution have a mixed feeling of greater redistribution?
选项
答案
People expect to reach the top of the economic ladder and don’t like to be at the bottom. On one hand, they hope their income can be raised through redistribution; on the other hand, some poor people may be opposed to the policies that would actually raise their own income a bit but that might also push those who are poorer than them into higher positions.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lkua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Socialethics
Perhapsweshouldthinkintermsofraisinginterestrates______them,inconsiderationofthenewreportsaboutinflationrepo
Mencannotmanufacturebloodasefficientlyaswomencan.Thismakessurgeryriskierformen.Menalsoneedmoreoxygenbecause
Notationgavewesternmusicameansofwrittenrecord,butatfirstonlyforakindofmusic,chant,thatwasbelievedtohaveo
Thevalueofheatforthepreservationoffoodhasbeenknownforthousandsofyears,butitwasnotrealizeduntilthenineteen
Sakewatennobiroku,goestheJapanesesaying:Sakeisheaven’sreward.Formorethanathousandyears,theJapanesehavereli
"Awriter’sjobistotellthetruth,"saidHemingwayin1942.Nootherwriterofourtimehadsofiercelyasserted,sopugnacio
Theotherdayanacquaintanceofmine,agregariousandcharmingman,toldmehehadfoundhimselfunexpectedlyaloneinNewYor
Theintroductionofgunpowdergraduallymadethebowandarrow______,particularlyinWesternEurope.
随机试题
反义词的表达作用有()
乳腺癌根治术后如何护理引流管?
A.水杨酸B.秋水仙碱C.塞来昔布D.布洛芬E.萘丁美酮在体内R型异构体可转化为S型异构体的是
A气血充足B气火有余C气血虚弱D蓄毒日久损伤筋骨E血络受损脓色绿黑稀薄者,其病机为
男,55岁,咳嗽,咳痰10余年,近2年来加重,常咳黄色脓痰,伴有气喘。1周前受凉后症状加剧,发绀,两肺闻及湿性啰音及哮鸣音。最可能诊断为
女,35岁。继发性闭经1年,雌激素试验(+),FSH、LH值均<5U/L,多次重复垂体兴奋试验无反应。该患者闭经的原因在
某小区徐某未获得规划许可证和施工许可证便在自住房前扩建一个门面房,挤占小区人行通道。小区其他业主多次要求徐某拆除未果后,将该门面房强行拆除,毁坏了徐某自住房屋的墙砖。关于拆除行为,下列哪些表述是正确的?()
雨花公司自2009年年初经营恶化,拖欠债务,资不抵债,2010年9月1日雨花公司向人民法院申请破产清算,2010年9月10日法院裁定受理申请,并指定了管理人。管理人可以申请撤销雨花公司的下列哪些行为?()
真理是人们对于客观事物及其规律的正确认识。真理的本质属性是()
下列矩阵中A与B合同的是()
最新回复
(
0
)