首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2019-08-27
36
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads — against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT______.
选项
A、political power
B、high fares
C、economic loss
D、indifference
答案
C
解析
根据文中最后一段的“As the century wore on,public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.”可知,随着20世纪的渐渐逝去,公众舆论开始不利于铁路公司——开始反对他们在经济和政治上的权力、高票价以及他们对个人的冷漠无情。据此可知,引起公众不满的因素中不包括经济损失,C项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lzTO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Scienceisanenterpriseconcernedwithgaininginformationaboutcausality,ortherelationshipbetweencauseandeffect.Asim
【T1】ComparativehistorianMarcFerroclaimsthatthelargestdiscrepancyinknowledgebetweenwhatacademichistoriansandwhat
Lawsofcompulsiveschoolingfunnelchildrenintoschoolataprescribedageirrespectiveofwhethertheyareready.Manypa
Intheprivacyofourminds,wealltalktoourselves—aninnermonologuethatseemratherpointless.Asonescientificpaperon
Thewaypeopleholdtothebeliefthatafun-filled,painfreelifeequalshappinessactuallyreducestheirchancesofeverattai
Thenewschoolbuildingis______completion.
Thisspecialcommitteewasestablishedforwell-integratedmembersofthesocietyandnotfor______individuals.
Ironically,theintellectualtoolscurrentlybeingusedbythepoliticalrighttosuchharmfuleffectoriginatedontheacademic
It’sallannualback-to-schoolroutine.Onemorningyouwavegoodbye,andthat【C1】______eveningyou’reburningthelate-nightoi
(四川大学2010年试题)Youprobablyknowthatit’sbetterforbothyouandtheenvironmentifyoubuyanorganictomatoinsteadofon
随机试题
螺旋CT与传统CT的本质区别在于
选择广告主题的最佳标准是()
管理者所扮演的信息角色包括监督者、_____和发言人。
男性,65岁,反复发作左上腹痛10年,多为夜间、饥饿时发作,上腹胀痛伴呕吐1天,吐后症状缓解。查体:左上腹压痛,振水音阳性。可能的诊断
2006年3月20日晚韩某和本班同学刘某在电影院门口盗窃自行车一辆,商定各骑2个月后将车卖掉,得款均分。2006年5月19日韩某14岁生日,16岁的刘某骑自行车去韩某家参加聚会的途中被联防人员查获,并供出自己和韩某盗窃的全过程。为此,两人所属的区公安局作出
外币存款业务与人民币存款业务的共同点不包括()。
湖北省矿产资源丰富,其中()等储量居全国前列。
小组准备期要开始几项与小组过程有关联的物质准备工作,主要包括()。
针对教师道德品质的差异性特点,开展教师职业道德教育时最适合的方法是()。
Collegehasmanysocialattractions,someofwhichcanbedistractions.Sports,concerts,parties,anddormitorybull(废话)session
最新回复
(
0
)