首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
admin
2016-04-26
21
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
A)A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity. B)Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated(复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
C)Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
D)One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied(小众的)pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m -7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish(消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification(the replication of other people’s results)does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
E)Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct, And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such lake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
F)Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis(假设)are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
G)The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
H)All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing(基因组测序)into a flow of truly significant ones.
I)Ideally, research protocols(草案)should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are.(It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.)
Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
J)The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set- aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
K)Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
The flawed research wastes not only money but also the energy of other talents.
选项
答案
C
解析
本题阐述了学术造假的危害,可知答案应在What a load of rubbish标题下的内容查找。由flawedresearch,wastes money和energy of talents可以定位到C段第1句,原文提到即使现在的各种虚假学术不会危及生命,但是依旧浪费了大量的金钱和精英的努力,题中的wastes money对应文中的blows money,而the energy of talents对应文中的efforts of some of the world’s best minds,故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/m0e7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Parents’Homework:FindPerfectTeachersforKidsA)TomiHalldidwhatshecouldtolobbyforthebestteachersforhertwochil
Inmanycountries,governmentsaretryingtogetcitizenstoeatmorehealthily.Onewayinwhichgovernmentsaretryingtodot
Sometimeago,aninterestingdiscoverywasmadeby【C1】______ontheAegeanislandofKea.AnAmericanteamexploredatemplewhi
EndangeredPeoplesA)Today,itisnotdistance,butculturethatseparatesthepeoplesoftheworld.Thecentralquestionofour
EndangeredPeoplesA)Today,itisnotdistance,butculturethatseparatesthepeoplesoftheworld.Thecentralquestionofour
Yearsago,doctorsoftensaidthatpainwasanormalpartoflife.Inparticular,whenolderpatients【C1】______ofpain,theywer
Whenwasthelasttimeyousawafrog?Chancesare,ifyouliveinacity,youhavenotseenoneforsometime.Eveninwetarea
A、Themanthoughttheessaywaseasy.B、Theybothhadahardtimewritingtheessay.C、Thewomanthoughttheessaywaseasy.D、N
A、In1911.B、In1913.C、In1930.D、In1931.C细节题。短文最后提到,尽管没有实质性的证据能够证明FurukawaTakeji的观点,但他的理论很快就流行起来。到了1930年,正规的求职申请表(standardj
Whileit’seasyenoughtobrushoffafewsleeplessnightswithapotofcoffeeandtheoccasionaldesknap,youmaybedoingmo
随机试题
患者,女,30岁1周前四肢部突发风团,高起皮肤,边界清楚,瘙痒甚,时隐时现,伴有便秘,舌苔黄腻,脉滑数。下列关于本病例治疗的叙述中,正确的有()(2010年第176题)
热力学第二定律不是守恒定律。()
Auctions(拍卖)arepublicsalesofgoods,conductedbyanofficiallyapprovedauctioneer.Heasksthecrowdassembledintheauct
甲公司为一家制造企业,适用的增值税税率为17%,商品销售全部符合收入确认条件,销售成本月末一次结转,M产品的单位成本为80元。2016年7月该公司发生下列业务:(1)1日,向乙公司销售M产品8000件,开具的增值税专用发票上注明的价款为80万元,增
1936年12月12日,张学良、杨虎城在()扣留蒋介石,并向全国通电,提出停止内战、一致对外等八项主张。
根据材料回答下列问题国家助学贷款目的是帮助贫困学子完成学业,圆一个大学梦;帮助大学生成长成才,撑起一片天。但这种帮助不是无偿的,有相应的责任和义务,有法律的规定和约束。迄今为止,国家助学贷款已实施了近8个年头,总计资助金额超过200亿元,资助学子高达24
有以下程序#include<stdio.h>intfun(chars[])main(){intn==0;{chars[10]={’6’
Directions:Youareaskedtowrite160~200wordsunderthetitleofTheAdvantagesandDisadvantagesofPrivateTutoring.Yoush
A、 B、 C、 C问将主持市场营销研讨会的人的Who疑问句。(A)是对问位置的Where疑问句可能的回答,是有疑问词错误的错误选项;(B)是对When疑问句可能的回答,也含疑问词错误,代词He不可能出现,是错误选项。因
A、Theplaceofmatches.B、Theprocedureofmatches.C、Thejoiningfee.D、Thetrainingsessions.A讲座中提到,本赛季会有一些变化,第一个就是赛场,所有的网球和足
最新回复
(
0
)