首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it come
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it come
admin
2015-01-09
62
问题
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it comes from God, or else through the application of reason.
But in The Bonobo and the Atheist, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better: morality comes from our evolutionary past as a social primate. Like our closest relatives, the apes, humans evolved in small, tightly knit, cooperative groups. As a result, again like the apes, we are exquisitely sensitive to one another’s moods, needs and intentions.
This well-developed empathy provided the trellis on which morality later flowered. De Waal, who is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, has been making this case eloquently for many years and over several books, notably in Good Natured back in 1997, and in Primates and Philosophers, 12 years later.
In his new work, he bolsters the argument by drawing on a lot of new research, carefully footnoted for those who want to dig deeper. De Waal distinguishes two degrees of morality. The first he calls "one-on-one morality", which governs how an individual can expect to be treated, and the second "community concern", a larger, more abstract concept that extends to the harmony of the group as a whole.
Chimps and bonobos certainly have the former—they respect ownership, for example, and expect to be treated according to their place in the hierarchy. But de Waal presents several examples—such as a chimp stepping in to stop a fight between two others—that suggest that they also have a rudimentary form of the latter.
The book’s title, incidentally, draws on bonobos because they are more likely than chimps to behave morally, to have concern for each other, to value harmony and so on. This, imagines, de Waal, is something morally inclined atheists would want to emulate. If humans inherited morality from our ancestors, though, what are we to make of religion? Here de Waal moves into the territory he has not explored before. Clearly, religion must do something important, since every human culture has it. But instead of religion giving us morality, de Waal turns the tables. Morality, he argues, probably gave us religion as a way of reinforcing the pre-existing community concern.
If he’s right, then there may be no absolute code of right and wrong out there to be discovered. Instead, each individual’s evolved sense of empathy and concern for the group may help shape the group’s consensus on what kind of behaviour is appropriate. In short, says de Waal, morality may be something we all have to work out together. It’s a persuasive argument, and de Waal’s cautious and evidence-based approach is one that many New Scientist readers are sure to find congenial.
That careful approach is less evident in another book covering some of the same ground. In How Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for their dead. It’s an intriguing question, but unfortunately King’s book is largely a succession of anecdotes: the cat who roams the house, crying, in search of its dead litter mate; the dog who waits daily at the train station for its dead master; a dolphin trying to keep her dead calf afloat for days.
Some of these stories make a persuasive case for some animals—especially apes, elephants and cetaceans— sometimes grieving. No surprises there: I suspect most readers would have conceded that ground right from the start.
But King makes little effort to dig any deeper by exploring, for example, the neural machinery and cognitive skills an animal needs in order to be capable of grief. After all, solitary species such as cats have less need for empathy- and its corollary, grief—than social animals, and small-brained creatures such as turtles may simply lack the brainpower or not form lasting pair bonds.
To his credit, de Waal takes full note of such distinctions; King, not so much.
About religion and morality, Frans de Waal believes that
选项
A、religion brings morality to us.
B、no code of right and wrong can be discovered out there.
C、people who have a religious belief behave appropriately.
D、individuals who care about a group can create morality.
答案
D
解析
细节题。第八段第二句提到,个体对群体所产生的共鸣与关注,有助于形成群体对恰当行为的共识,也就是说道德是我们共同努力的结果,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/m5dO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AsmanyeducationreformsaretakingplacethroughoutChina,BeijingUniversitywentonestepfurtherandestablishedtheConfuc
GuoXue,orthestudiesofChineseancientcivilization,includingphilosophy,history,archaeology,literature,linguistics,et
Overthepastdecade,DINK(DoubleIncomesNoKids)hasbeenalifestylepursuedbyanincreasingamountofwesternersandhas
Throughoutmostofitshistory,______wasamajorproblemthatplaguedIreland.
LondonissteepedinDickensianhistory.Everyplacehevisited,everypersonhemet,wouldbedrawnintohisimaginationandre
LondonissteepedinDickensianhistory.Everyplacehevisited,everypersonhemet,wouldbedrawnintohisimaginationandre
IntroductoryLecturetoUniversityStudyInordertoadjustwelltouniversitylife,freshmenusuallyhavetounderstandthe
IntroductoryLecturetoUniversityStudyInordertoadjustwelltouniversitylife,freshmenusuallyhavetounderstandthe
随机试题
肾外髓部组织液高渗的形成是由于
经腹超声测量正常成人前列腺的大小约
A.丰隆B.阳陵泉C.公孙D.太溪E.足三里用于强壮保健的要穴是
甲房地产开发公司与乙建筑工程公司签订工程承包合同,由乙建筑工程公司承建甲房地产开发公司开发的一栋高级公寓工程。合同约定了具体的工程进度要求,甲房地产开发公司按照工程进度支付工程款。在履行合同过程中,由于施工技术落后,乙建筑工程公司没有在合同约定的期限内完成
美国心理学家马斯洛的需要层次论中高层次的需要包括()。
康有为在《大同书》中设计了前后衔接完整的教育体系。
根据合同法的有关规定,下列选项中,属于可撤销合同适用的情形是()。
1938年11月,毛泽东在《战争和战略问题》中明确指出:“共产党的任务,基本地不是经过长期合法斗争以进入起义和战争,也不是先占城市后取乡村,而是走相反的道路。”中国走农村包同城市、武装夺取政权道路的依据是
[*]
Juicemaybetasty,butit’snotreallythatnourishing.Whileorangejuiceisan【B1】_____sourceofvitaminC,itdoesn’tconta
最新回复
(
0
)