首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What was the research about?
What was the research about?
admin
2009-06-24
31
问题
What was the research about?
W: Prof Schneider, you and three colleagues just published new research in the Proceedings of the National (U.S.) Academy of Sciences. Could you explain what this tells us?
M: Many current investigations into climate change rely on statistical or physical models—and all models rely on assumptions.
We thought why not ask plants and animals directly if they have felt any climate changes lately? We wanted to find out if nature had more credible answers than models alone the animals and plants in nature can give us independent evidence of human induced global warming.
So we looked at more than 130 different plant and bird species in the northern hemisphere—mainly in Northern America and Europe—to see how flowering and migration times have changed. And we compared our findings with a state-of-the-art climate model driven by natural forces like volcanic eruptions, human pressures like greenhouse gas emissions and the combination.
Normally, such model-driven results are compared to temperature measurements such as thermometers, weather balloons, and satellites—all of which have controversies attached as to their reliability. So we just jumped over the controversy by using plants and animals as "surrogate" thermometers to see if a clear signal emerged.
W: And what was the result?
M: First of all, you can today clearly see how much earlier plants flower in spring—in the thirty years from 1970 to 2000, flowering has moved to an earlier moment by almost ten days. The best fit with the species records came from the computer model driven by the combination of natural and human pressures. In fact the strongest single factor is human forces like greenhouse gases and industrial hazes.
Secondly you can see that this is in accordance with the climate model that we used a standard model on which many climate scientists rely. So the research shows once more that the general results of the model calculations actually are true—we can see the same basic things the model predicts going on in nature.
选项
A、Temperature fluctuations over 30 years.
B、Calculations made by computer models.
C、The impact of natural forces.
D、The effect of industrialization.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mTTd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
SuccessfulLanguageLearners1Somepeopleseemtohaveaknackforlearninglanguages.Theycanpickupnewvocabulary,maste
TheAmericanFamilyIntheAmericanfamilythehusbandandwifeusuallyshareimportantdecisionmaking.Whenthechildrenareo
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrue,accordingtothepassage?Whatdoesthecustomercollectbeforeheorsheleaves
Accordingtothepassage,whichofthefollowinghaschangedthemostinthelast500years?"Some"inthelastsentenceofthe
Theexpeditionreachedthesummitat10:30thatmorning.
Naturalgasdidn’tbecometheleadingfueluntilAccordingtoparagraph3,energyconsumedinhomeheatingoverthenexttwode
You’dbetterputthesedocumentsina(safe)place.
WhyPeopleUsePseudonyms(假名字)?Youcan’tchoosethenameyouaregivenatbirth,butinmanycountriesyoucanchangeit
HowtoBeaSuccessfulBusinesspersonHaveyoueverwonderedwhysomepeoplearesuccessfulinbusinessandothersarenot?
Whatarethetwodeclarationsconcernedwith?Thephrase“kickedaround”(paragraph4)couldbebestreplacedby
随机试题
受委托组织在委托范围内,以委托行政机关名义实施行政处罚;不得再委托其他任何组织或者个人实施行政处罚。()
葡萄胎常并发
男性,62岁。右下肺鳞癌已顺利经过手术,淋巴结无转移。患者及其家属极为关心其预后。下列哪条不是判定预后的主要因素
患者,男,48岁。确诊慢性粒细胞白血病已2年半,服用白消安治疗效果较好。近期出现乏力,低热,鼻衄。检查:脾大肋缘下6cm,血红蛋白70g/L,外周血原始粒细胞比例大于20%。应首先考虑的是
可改善骨性关节炎、保护软骨的药物是
个人质押贷款的还款方式包括()。
某酒厂为增值税一般纳税人,主要生产粮食白酒和啤酒。2009年“主营业务收入”账户反映销售粮食白酒50000斤,取得不含税销售额105000元;销售啤酒150吨,每吨不含税售价2900元。在“其他业务收入”账户反映收取粮食白酒品牌使用费4680元,销
高二(1)班李同学的肥胖问题较为严重,因此寻求体育教师张老师的帮助。张老师根据李同学身体状况为其制定了运动处方。在制定运动处方之前,为确保科学合理,张老师先对李同学进行体适能检测,测定其体能水平;随后进行临床健康检查,查看是否存在其他健康问题,以便更有针对
社会团体党组织的设置形式根据()和工作需要确定。
FromthefoundingofHarvardCollegein1636untiltheCivilWar,Americanuniversityeducationwasmostlyaboutsendingpiousa
最新回复
(
0
)