首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
67
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
ThemanwantedthewomantobringthefollowingEXCEPT
Somecollegesexpresstheirdisapprovalsofstudentsinvestinginstockmarketbecausetheyconsideritasadistractionforthe
Depressingreportsabouthowquicklytheworld’stropicalforestsarebeingfelledarecommonplace.Butdepressingreportsabout
Whatinformationdoesthewomanneedtodothecheck-infortheman?
Thesimpleactofsurrenderingatelephonenumbertoastoreclerkmaynotseemharmful—somuchsothatmanyconsumersdoitwit
Thesimpleactofsurrenderingatelephonenumbertoastoreclerkmaynotseemharmful—somuchsothatmanyconsumersdoitwit
Obviously,theChairman’sremarksattheconferencewere________andnotplanned.
OnSundaysmyfatheralwaysworethatdullgrayapron—theonewiththeracecarsalloverit.Theritualbeganafterbreakfastw
Inmyneighborhoodintheearly1980s,wespentthesummerplayingkickball.Ourfrontlawnswereaconstant.Wetooktheirsoft
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,buthistoryshowstheycanalsobehighlyeffective.
随机试题
()方法是对序列中的元素通过适当的位置交换将有关元素一次性地放置在其最终位置上。
患者,男,58岁。身高165cm,体重76kg。体检时发现空腹血糖6.7mmol/L,下列哪项考虑是正确的
患儿,男,8岁。前牙深覆牙合3mm,磨牙为远中关系,上前牙前突,上牙弓狭窄此时的治疗属于
女性,35岁。5个月来间歇性胸背剧痛。体检:右侧下肢肌力Ⅳ度伴膝、踝反射亢进,Babinski征阳性。右踝振动觉消失,左胸下痛温觉消失。余神经系统无异常。胸椎平片无异常。可能诊断为
北美大陆桥是世界上最长的陆桥运输线。()
某市经央行批准从事金银首饰经营业务的中外合资首饰厂是增值税一般纳税人,经营范围为首饰的制作、批发、零售、带料加工、修理、清洗,2016年5月发生下列业务:(1)购入红宝石戒面800粒,取得增值税专用发票上注明价款80000元,增值税13600元;购入18
下列股票交易行为中,不违反证券法律制度规定的是()。
1940年,( )首先撰文分析弗洛伊德精神分析理论对社会工作专业的影响。
if语句的语法格式可描述为:格式1:if()或格式2:if()else关于上面的语法格式,下列表述中错误的是()。
AccordingtoIanPearson,afuturologist,theseareamongthedevelopmentsscheduledforthefirstfewdecadesofthenewmillen
最新回复
(
0
)