首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
50
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thewordhugisofuncertainorigin.TheOxfordEnglishDictionarycautionsagainstconfusingitwithhugge—avariantoftheMid
AsimplepieceofropehangsbetweensomeenvironmentallyfriendlyAmericansandtheirneighbors.Ononesidestandthosewhoha
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofa(n)【C1】______shouldbema
HowmuchmoneyhasbeenprovidedtoAfghanistancitizens?
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshores,heencounteredcopper-shinnedpeoplewhomhepromptlycalled"Indians".Cu
Inthissurvey,wecangetallthefollowinginformationEXCEPT
Thecourtwouldnotaccepthisappealunless______evidenceisprovided
Fromheat-hazeandsummersmogtooutsizehailstonesandflashfloods:moretopsyturvyweatherisontheway,Britain’sforecast
Whenonespouseisdepressed,amarriageisdepressed.Thisillnesserodesemotionalandsexualintimacyandmakesarelationshi
Bosseswoulddowelltobealarmed.Novemberishere,andwithitagoodchancethatthebackofficeisn’tprocessingdata,but
随机试题
组成合金的独立的最基本的物质称为()。
()电源内部的通路称为外电路。
下列不符合卵巢绒毛膜癌的描述是
标本取材的注意事项中,错误的是
下列有关tRNA的叙述,正确的是
利用外资改组国有企业时,经济贸易主管部门在收到改组申请材料后,()内应做出是否同意的批复。
教学反馈在课堂教学中的作用包括()。
“洪武皇帝……希望牢牢将权力抓在自己手中,并试图独自处理国家大事,但是这样的工作负担被证明是无法承担的,他于是召集一些忠诚的中级官员组成了一个特别的行政部门……”上述“中级官员”的主要职能是()。
最新研究发现,狼和狗的关键性区别,是食用人类食物这一特点。经过几个世纪,食用人类食物导致了狗具备消化淀粉的基因,它们因此能依靠人类剩余的饭菜繁衍下来,并最终对它们实现了驯化,即在形态、生理功能、行为习惯、对人类的态度等方面都发生大幅度的变化,成为家畜。以下
Thequalityofpatiencegoesalongwaytowardyourgoalofcreatingamorepeacefulandlovingself.Themorepatientyouare,
最新回复
(
0
)