首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
admin
2011-02-11
76
问题
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether multilateralist or unilateralist, American or European, have come to agree that the organization is in crisis. This week, a blue ribbon panel commissioned by the body’s secretary-general, Kofi Annan, released its report on what to do about it.
The U. N. ’s sorry state became most obvious with the Iraq war. Those favoring the war were furious that after a decade of Security Council resolutions, including the last-chance Resolution 1441 threatening "serious consequences" if Iraq did not prove its disarmament, the U. N. could not agree to act. Anti-war types were just as frustrated that the world body failed to stop the war. But Iraq was not the U. N.’s only problem. It has done little to stop humanitarian disasters, such as the ongoing horror in Sudan. And it has done nothing to stop Iran’s and North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Recognizing the danger of irrelevance, Mr. Annan last year told a 16-member panel, composed mainly of former government ministers and heads of government, to suggest changes. These fall broadly into two categories: the institutional and the cultural. The former has got most of the headlines -- particularly a call for changing the structure of the Security Council. But changes in the U. N. ’s working practices are crucial too.
Everyone agrees that the Security Council is an unrepresentative relic: of its 15 seats, five are occupied by permanent, veto-wielding members (America, Russia, China, Britain and France) and ten go to countries that rotate every two years and have no veto. But that the council’s composition is a throwback to the world order immediately after the Second World War has been agreed on for decades, without any success in changing it. Japan and Germany, the secondand thirdbiggest contributors to the U.N. budget, believe they are entitled to permanent seats. So does India, the world’s second-most- populous country, and Brazil, Latin America’s biggest. Unlike in previous efforts, these four have finally banded together to press their case. And they are joined in spirit by the Africans, who want two seats for their continent.
But each aspirant has opponents. Italy opposes a permanent seat for Germany, which would make Italy the only biggish European power. It instead proposes a single seat for the European Union, a non- starter since this would require Britain and France to give up theirs, and regional institutions cannot be U.N. members under the current U.N. Charter. Spanish-speaking Mexico and Argentina do not think Portuguese-speaking Brazil should represent Latin America, and Pakistan strongly opposes its rival India’s bid. As for potential African seats, Egypt claims one as the representative of the Muslim and Arab world. That would leave Nigeria, the continent’s most populous country, and South Africa, which is richer and a more stable democracy, fighting for the other.
The panel has proposed two alternatives. The first would give six countries ( none is named but probably Germany, Japan, India, Brazil and two African countries) permanent seats without a veto, and create three extra non-permanent seats, bringing the total number of council members to 24. The second, which would expand the council by the same number of seats, creates a new middle tier of members who would serve for four years and could be immediately re-elected, above the current lower tier of two-year members, who cannot be re-elected. The rivals to the would-be permanent members favor this option.
While Security Council reform may be the most visible of the proposals, the panel has also shared its views on the guidelines on when members may use force legally, tinder the U. N. Charter, they can do so in two circumstances only: Article 51 allows force in a clear case of self-defense, and Chapter Ⅶ permits its use when the Security Council agrees. While the panelists have not proposed major changes to these two parts of the Charter, they have offered refinements.
Though the Charter was written to govern war between countries, the panel argues that even without revision, Chapter Ⅶ lets the Security Council authorize force for more controversial, modem reasons like fighting terrorists and intervention in states committing humanitarian horrors. It even considers "preventive" wars against serious but non-imminent threats potentially justifiable.
But the panel also says any decision to use force must pass five tests: the threat must be grave; the primary purpose must be to avert the threat; force must be a last resort; means must be proportional; and there must be a reasonable chance that force will succeed without calamitous consequences. All common-sense stuff, but the panel proposes making these tests explicit (if subjective and unofficial), thus raising the quality of debate about any decision to go to war.
On top of this, the report urges the U.N. to make better use of its assets in the fight against terrorism. One of the obstacles to an effective counter-terrorism strategy has been U.N. members’ inability to agree on a definition of terrorism. The panel tries to help by defining it as "any action that is intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants"; Arab countries may continue to press for exemptions in the case of "foreign occupation". The report also deals with what it sees as a possible "cascade of nuclear proliferation" in the near future. It recommends creating more incentives for countries to stop enriching uranium.
What’s the main topic of the passage?
选项
A、The current crisis of the U. N.
B、Suggestion on changes in working practices of file U. N.
C、Improvement in the efficiency of the U. N.
D、The U. N. in the Iraq war.
答案
B
解析
主旨题。文章自始至终都是针对联合国现有问题提出的改革建议,可见B正确。文章重点在如何解决问题而不在分析问题,故排除A;C原文中并没有提到;D只在原文第二段和结尾部分提到,属于细节而非主旨。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/n0eO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswereeffectivewith【M1】______detectingillne
Humanmigration:thetermisvague.Whatpeopleusuallythinkofisthepermanentmovementofpeoplefromonehometoanother.M
Manypeoplethinkthattraditionalcultureswillbelostasscienceandtechnologydevelops.People’slifeischangingrapidlyw
1Therearevariouswaysinwhichindividualeconomicunitscaninteractwithoneanother.Threebasicwaysmaybedescribed
1OurheritageandourculturehavecausedmostAmericanstoassumenotonlythatourlanguageisuniversalbutthattheges
Allthesame,it’therebenottheintention,thereisatleasttheaccident,ofstyle,which,ifonelooksatitatafriendly
ThefirstAsaninvestmentbankerspecializinginmergersandacquisitions,FrancoisvonHurterspentalotoftimeinairportl
A、London.B、Paris.C、TheUnitedStates.D、Japan.C
Heiswaitingfortheairlineticketcounterwhenhefirstnoticestheyoungwoman.Shehasglossyblackhairpulledtightlyint
随机试题
科学的决策必须符合的基本标准有哪些?
成熟红细胞获得能量的唯一途径是
质量管理体系认证制度是指()对企业的产品及质量管理体系做出正确可靠的评价。
巴塞尔协议Ⅲ内容涉及()。
审读短稿,按审稿的基本要求指出其中存在的错误或缺漏。所谓出版物,就是指具有一定载体的作品。随着社会的进步和科学技术的发展,出版物的种类也在增加。根据内容来划分,出版物可分为图书、报纸、期刊、电子出版物和互联网出版物五大类。其中,图书、报纸和期刊主
正式排球比赛中,球员的轮转方式为_______。
大众文化虽然具有天生的民主品格,可以被广泛分享,但是它对广度的无限制追求必然使它成为无深度的文化。为了迎合大众的平均理解力和对于娱乐的需求。大众文化在诞生之日起就不以独创性和个性化为指归。下列对大众文化的特征归纳不正确的是( )。
巴纳姆效应产生的原因被认为是“主观验证”的作用,即当有一条观点声称专门描述某人时,就很可能被接受。因为想要相信一件事,人们还会搜集各种“证据”来支持自己的设想。它主要表现为人们很容易相信一个笼统的、一般性的人格描述特别适合自己,即使这种描述十分空洞,人们仍
近年来尽管每年有一个世界无烟日,有大量关于吸烟有百害而无一利的________,也有日益高涨的香烟价格的限制,但仍然________不住烟民队伍扩大的势头。青少年和女性吸烟者的增多,已成为让人________的社会问题。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是(
线性表常采用的两种存储结构是()。
最新回复
(
0
)