首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
admin
2011-02-11
54
问题
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether multilateralist or unilateralist, American or European, have come to agree that the organization is in crisis. This week, a blue ribbon panel commissioned by the body’s secretary-general, Kofi Annan, released its report on what to do about it.
The U. N. ’s sorry state became most obvious with the Iraq war. Those favoring the war were furious that after a decade of Security Council resolutions, including the last-chance Resolution 1441 threatening "serious consequences" if Iraq did not prove its disarmament, the U. N. could not agree to act. Anti-war types were just as frustrated that the world body failed to stop the war. But Iraq was not the U. N.’s only problem. It has done little to stop humanitarian disasters, such as the ongoing horror in Sudan. And it has done nothing to stop Iran’s and North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Recognizing the danger of irrelevance, Mr. Annan last year told a 16-member panel, composed mainly of former government ministers and heads of government, to suggest changes. These fall broadly into two categories: the institutional and the cultural. The former has got most of the headlines -- particularly a call for changing the structure of the Security Council. But changes in the U. N. ’s working practices are crucial too.
Everyone agrees that the Security Council is an unrepresentative relic: of its 15 seats, five are occupied by permanent, veto-wielding members (America, Russia, China, Britain and France) and ten go to countries that rotate every two years and have no veto. But that the council’s composition is a throwback to the world order immediately after the Second World War has been agreed on for decades, without any success in changing it. Japan and Germany, the secondand thirdbiggest contributors to the U.N. budget, believe they are entitled to permanent seats. So does India, the world’s second-most- populous country, and Brazil, Latin America’s biggest. Unlike in previous efforts, these four have finally banded together to press their case. And they are joined in spirit by the Africans, who want two seats for their continent.
But each aspirant has opponents. Italy opposes a permanent seat for Germany, which would make Italy the only biggish European power. It instead proposes a single seat for the European Union, a non- starter since this would require Britain and France to give up theirs, and regional institutions cannot be U.N. members under the current U.N. Charter. Spanish-speaking Mexico and Argentina do not think Portuguese-speaking Brazil should represent Latin America, and Pakistan strongly opposes its rival India’s bid. As for potential African seats, Egypt claims one as the representative of the Muslim and Arab world. That would leave Nigeria, the continent’s most populous country, and South Africa, which is richer and a more stable democracy, fighting for the other.
The panel has proposed two alternatives. The first would give six countries ( none is named but probably Germany, Japan, India, Brazil and two African countries) permanent seats without a veto, and create three extra non-permanent seats, bringing the total number of council members to 24. The second, which would expand the council by the same number of seats, creates a new middle tier of members who would serve for four years and could be immediately re-elected, above the current lower tier of two-year members, who cannot be re-elected. The rivals to the would-be permanent members favor this option.
While Security Council reform may be the most visible of the proposals, the panel has also shared its views on the guidelines on when members may use force legally, tinder the U. N. Charter, they can do so in two circumstances only: Article 51 allows force in a clear case of self-defense, and Chapter Ⅶ permits its use when the Security Council agrees. While the panelists have not proposed major changes to these two parts of the Charter, they have offered refinements.
Though the Charter was written to govern war between countries, the panel argues that even without revision, Chapter Ⅶ lets the Security Council authorize force for more controversial, modem reasons like fighting terrorists and intervention in states committing humanitarian horrors. It even considers "preventive" wars against serious but non-imminent threats potentially justifiable.
But the panel also says any decision to use force must pass five tests: the threat must be grave; the primary purpose must be to avert the threat; force must be a last resort; means must be proportional; and there must be a reasonable chance that force will succeed without calamitous consequences. All common-sense stuff, but the panel proposes making these tests explicit (if subjective and unofficial), thus raising the quality of debate about any decision to go to war.
On top of this, the report urges the U.N. to make better use of its assets in the fight against terrorism. One of the obstacles to an effective counter-terrorism strategy has been U.N. members’ inability to agree on a definition of terrorism. The panel tries to help by defining it as "any action that is intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants"; Arab countries may continue to press for exemptions in the case of "foreign occupation". The report also deals with what it sees as a possible "cascade of nuclear proliferation" in the near future. It recommends creating more incentives for countries to stop enriching uranium.
What’s the main topic of the passage?
选项
A、The current crisis of the U. N.
B、Suggestion on changes in working practices of file U. N.
C、Improvement in the efficiency of the U. N.
D、The U. N. in the Iraq war.
答案
B
解析
主旨题。文章自始至终都是针对联合国现有问题提出的改革建议,可见B正确。文章重点在如何解决问题而不在分析问题,故排除A;C原文中并没有提到;D只在原文第二段和结尾部分提到,属于细节而非主旨。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/n0eO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThebiggestproblemfacingChileasitpromotesitselfasatouristdestinationtobereckonedwith,is’thatitisattheendo
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswereeffectivewith【M1】______detectingillne
Humanmigration:thetermisvague.Whatpeopleusuallythinkofisthepermanentmovementofpeoplefromonehometoanother.M
LandUseAproblemrelatedtothecompetitionforlanduseiswhethercropsshouldbeusedtoproducefoodorfuel.【1】_____
1Afolkcultureisasmallisolated,cohesive,conservative,nearlyselfsufficientgroupthatishomogeneousincustomand
ScientificandlearnedEnglishisnotmerelyinternationalinusinginternationalwords.Englishisfrequentlyusednationallyf
Thecostsassociatedwithnaturaldisastersareincreasingrapidly.Asaresult,officialsingovernmentandindustryhavefocus
1"Itisalwaysconsolingtothinkofsuicide,"theGermanphilosopherFriedrichNietzscheoncewrote,"inthatwayonegets
Ihavenostatisticsonthis,butconversationwithfriendsanddozensofperson-on-the-streetinterviewsIsawandheardlastm
Heiswaitingfortheairlineticketcounterwhenhefirstnoticestheyoungwoman.Shehasglossyblackhairpulledtightlyint
随机试题
下列有关Word替换操作的叙述中,不正确的是()
《三国演义》中曹操兵败斜谷,进退两难,当夜规定军中口令为“鸡肋”。曹操的这种体验在心理学上属于动机的()
有三个牙尖,一个中央点隙、一条舌沟的牙是
A.月经间隔时间正常,但经期延长1~10天,量多B.月经周期紊乱,经期长短不一,出血时多时少C.月经周期缩短,月经频发D.月经周期正常,量少E.月经中期出血,量少
最适合于完成某一特别任务的组织结构形式是()。
下列关于人和高等动物神经调节和体液调节的叙述,正确的是()。
在练习的中后期往往出现进程的暂时停顿现象,这种现象称为()。
层次型、网状型和关系型数据库划分原则是()。
A、 B、 C、 B
ALogger’sLamentA)Myfatherwasalogger.Myhusbandisalogger.Mysonswillnotbeloggers.Loggersareanendangeredspeci
最新回复
(
0
)