首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2010-05-14
50
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not tree. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then --are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the. survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’ s too early to tell if that’ s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’ t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
When the author is talking about the Jewish Population Survey, he seems ______.
选项
A、to believe the shrinking of the Jews in America
B、to support the rejection of full integration into society
C、to blame United Jewish Communities
D、to be willing to tolerate the fault of United Jewish Communities
答案
C
解析
文章的主要内容是揭示调查所得出的犹太人口下降谬论并指出其负面影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nOqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Controllingthedeficit.B、Haltingthereal-estatecrisis.C、Preventingtheeconomicturmoil.D、Cuttingthehighunemployment
Iwanttodiscusssomeideasabouthowwemanageunderground【B1】______.Ifweonlytakeasmuchoutascomesin,we’renotgoing
A、Evacuatethecitysotheirlivescouldbesaved.B、PraytoGodsothatthepeopleandthegovernmentwouldfindstrengthagain
A、Catchsalespersonsellingguns.B、Lookoutforpoachers.C、Fightagainstpotentialterrorists.D、Patroltheterritory.A
A、Theyoungmanisconsideredmatureenoughtostandonhisownfeetandsupporthisfamily.B、Thelandownerpromisedahighinc
A、Shedoesnotfullyunderstandthecoursestaughtbynativespeakers.B、HerspokenEnglishisnotasaccurateasheexpectedit
Backin【B1】______,civilwarbrokeoutinBurundi.Manywerekilledina【B2】______ofinter-ethnicviolence.Thismonth,Bur
OnceshamewasaveryBritishemotion.Itgovernedpeople’sliveslongafterstocksandduckingstoolswereabolished.Shakespea
Accordingtothepassage,whichofthefollowingisNOTthewriter’sopinion?ItcanbeinferredfromthepassagethatIMFpoli
AftertheWarofIndependence,Americansdesignedanewsystem.Whatit?
随机试题
25岁男性患者,右上后牙半年前曾有明显的冷热刺激痛史,无自发痛史。现此牙无明显疼痛,食物嵌塞明显,求诊要求直接补牙。查见右上第二磨牙骀面近中颈部龋,探(+),冷热(±)叩(-),最可能的诊断为
就大多数病例对照研究而言,它们不具备下列哪个特点
申请领取施工许可证,下列()必须具备。
设备监理机构的人员一般由( )组成。
榨油厂要利用大豆期货进行买入套期保值的情形有()。[2010年5月真题]
以下不属于首次沿途导游内容的是()
意志行动的特征不包括()
根据《宪法》的规定,下列选项中既可以属于国家所有也可以属于集体所有的是()
symbol/symbolize
做自制或外购的决定时需要考虑(305)。对于系统集成企业而言,在进行项目核算时,一般可将需求开发费用、设计费用、实施费用、验收费用列入项目生命周期间发生的直接成本。
最新回复
(
0
)