首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the numb
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the numb
admin
2017-12-31
56
问题
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the number of workers who own shares in the business that employs them has never been higher. America leads the way: 32m Americans own stock in their companies through pension and profit-sharing plans, and share-ownership and share-option schemes. The idea continues to gain momentum. Hillary Clinton’s recent speeches suggest that she may make it an important plank in her plans to reform capitalism. And worker-capitalists are also on the march everywhere.
Conservatives like employee ownership because it gives workers a stake in the capitalist system. Left-wingers like it because it gives them a piece of the capitalist pie. And middle-of-the-roaders like it because it helps to close a potentially dangerous gap between capital and labour. Britain’s David Cameron praises John Lewis, a retailer entirely owned by its staff. Bernie Sanders, America’s only socialist senator and now a candidate for the Democratic nomination, is a champion of employee share-ownership.
The trend is also being driven by a long-term shift from "defined benefit"(DB)pension plans, in which employers guarantee the retirement income of their workers, to "defined contribution"(DC)schemes, in which workers and employers put money into an investment pot, with no guarantees of how much it will eventually pay out. Including current workers and pensioners there are more than 88m DC plans in existence. A 2013 survey by Aon Hewitt, a consulting firm, found that 14% of such plans’ assets were invested in the shares of the employer in question.
A number of studies have found that workers at firms where employees have a significant stake tend to be more productive and innovative, and to have less staff turnover. Employee ownership has its drawbacks, however. One is the risk that workers have too many eggs in one basket: if their employer goes bust they can lose their pensions as well as their jobs. Just before Enron went bankrupt in 2001 the average employee held 62% of his or her 401(k)assets in Enron shares. Despite various initiatives by Congress to stop firms touting their shares to employees, similar cases are still arising.
A second problem is entrenchment. Supporters of worker ownership argue that it helps companies take a more long-term perspective. Critics argue that it can entrench bad management and undermine a company’s long-term competitiveness: underperforming bosses are much more likely to be able to stay in place, and resist hostile takeovers, if some of the company’s shares are in friendly hands. In 1994 United Airlines handed many of its workers a 55% stake, and representation on the board, in return for pay cuts. But its performance remained poor, and it filed for bankruptcy in 2002.
A third risk is entitlement. The strongest argument in favour of employee ownership is that workers will not only toil harder if they get a slice of the profits, but will make sure that their colleagues do so too. A new paper by Benjamin Dunford and others, argues that commitment can transmute into entitlement. The academics studied a sample of 409 employees at a commercial-property firm in the Midwest and found that those who invested a higher proportion of their 401(k)accounts in company stock expected better benefits than the rest, and took more discretionary leave.(However, the study did not consider whether employee ownership boosted the firm’s overall performance.)
Arguments about employee ownership can easily become too sweeping: grand claims from supporters invite vigorous rebuttals by critics. A great deal depends on how schemes are structured, and the motives for introducing them. Another recent paper, by Han Kim and Paige Ouimet, considers the sizes of ESOPs and of the firms that offer them. They find that small ESOPs(which control a stake of less than 5 % in the company in question)are far more likely to boost productivity than large ones, because firms that introduce large ESOPs are often troubled ones trying to conserve cash by substituting shares for pay, or seeking to fend off hostile takeovers by giving shares to friendly insiders. They also argue that ESOPs are much more likely to work in smaller firms than larger ones because employee-owners can more easily monitor each other and boost overall productivity.
There is plenty to be said for employee ownership. It can sharpen workers’ motivation and go some way to healing a potentially dangerous divide between the working class and the boss class. But if politicians are serious about the idea, they need to think harder about how to make it work in practice. They should pay closer attention to how schemes are designed, and look for ways to tailor regulations and tax incentives so as to encourage well-designed schemes. They also need to deal with the problem of concentrating risk in a single company’ s shares. Given that the average life expectancy of Fortune 500 companies has fallen from 75 years in the 1930s to perhaps just 15 years today, encouraging employees to invest their savings with the companies that employ them is a recipe for miserable retirements.
Give an introduction of "defined benefit" pension plans and "defined contribution" schemes.
选项
答案
"defined benefit" pension plans: with which, the retirement income of employees will be guaranteed / "defined contribution" schemes: with which both workers and employers put money into an investment pot, but with no guarantee of how much it will pay out/ in a sense, they might earn more from such kind of investment/ or it also means more risks from such investment/ both workers and employers share the profits or losses from such investment/ one is more secured / the latter is more riskier /
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/o0SO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Theeraofdividedgovernmentbegins,inauspiciously.Willthepresidentbeabletoseethewoodforthesubpoenas?Isuspectth
Theeraofdividedgovernmentbegins,inauspiciously.Willthepresidentbeabletoseethewoodforthesubpoenas?Isuspectth
Itwasaone-linechatreplyfromanAncestryDNAcustomer-servicerepthatrippedCatherineSt.Clair’slife.At57,shewasher
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
Havingmorethan800minternetusersmeansthecountryhasanoverabundanceofdata,amostimportantinputforAIservices.
Inthepast,deathstruckrightthroughthelifecycle.Childrenwereespeciallyvulnerable,butmanyalsodiedinyoungormidd
Thebirthofachildisatimeofhope.Itsnewlifeisasymbolofpotentialforgrowth.Itsdeathisadenialofprogress.Whe
这本该只是一个简短的会议,然而却开了3个小时。我们离开会议室的时候,除了会议主席以外,大家都已经疲惫不堪了。关键词汇:besupposedto是指应该的意思。exhausted是指疲惫不堪,很累的意思。辨音难点:stepoutof连读。
随机试题
A.肉芽肿性炎B.纤维素性炎C.蜂窝织性炎D.出血性炎E.浆液性炎伤寒属于
A.医患关系是一种民事法律关系B.医患关系是具有道德意义较强的社会关系C.医患关系是一种商家与消费者的关系D.医患关系是包括非技术性和技术性方面的关系E.医患关系是患者与治疗者在诊疗和保健中所建立的联系反映医患关系本质的是
具有公共卫生特征的防龋措施是
A.血管紧张素转换酶B.β肾上腺素受体C.羟甲戊二酰辅酶A还原酶D.钙离子通道E.钾离子通道普萘洛尔的作用靶点是()。
能量意外释放理论中,哈登认为,在一定条件下,某种形式的能量能否产生造成人员伤亡事故的伤害取决于以下几方面,其中有关的是()。
甲、乙公司签订合同,甲公司将合同中的部分义务约定由丙公司完成,依照《合同法》规定,其法律关系特点为()。
下列证券中,受到利率风险影响较小的证券为( )。
甲公司拟收购乙上市公司。根据证券法律制度的规定,下列投资者中,如无相反证据,属于甲公司一致行动人的有()。
财富由“一代”向“二代”的转移正在形成不小的波峰,其中的隐忧、矛盾和纠纷已经很多,家族式的传承方式正在经受考验。现代家庭子女有限,从中选择一个胜任的接班人几乎等同赌博,因此,这是职业经理人走俏的开始,也是家族企业走向真正意义上的股份制道路的开始。为了财富的
设f(χ,y)有连续偏导数,满足f(1,2)=1,f′χ(1,2)=2,f′y(1,2)=3,Ф(χ)=f(χ,2f(χ,2f(χ,2χ))),则Ф′(1)=_______.
最新回复
(
0
)