首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law. When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s
Vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law. When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s
admin
2019-11-02
52
问题
Vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law. When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s amazing how little we have developed in other respects. We may speak contemptuously of the poor old Romans because they relished the orgies of slaughter that went on in their arenas. We may despise them because they mistook these goings-on for entertainment. We may forgive them condescendingly because they lived 2000 years ago and obviously knew no better. But are our feelings of superiority really justified? Are we any less blood-thirsty? Why do boxing matches, for instance, attract such universal interest? Don’t the spectators who attend them hope they will see some violence? Human beings remain as bloodthirsty as ever they were. The only difference between ourselves and the Romans is that while they were honest enough to admit that they enjoyed watching hungry lions, tearing people apart and eating them alive, we find all sorts of sophisticated arguments to defend sports which should have been banned long age; sports which are quite as barbarous as, say, public hangings or bearbaiting.
It is really incredible that in this day and age we should still allow hunting or bull-fighting, that we should be prepared to sit back and watch two men batter each other to pulp in a boxing ring, that we should be relatively unmoved by the sight of one or a number of racing cars crashing and bursting into flames. Let us not deceive ourselves. Any talk of the sporting spirit’ is sheer hypocrisy. People take part in violent sports because of the high rewards they bring. Spectators are willing to pay vast sums of money to see violence. A world heavyweight championship match, for instance, is front page news.
Millions of people are disappointed if a big fight is over in two rounds instead of fifteen. They feel disappointment because they have been deprived of the exquisite pleasure of witnessing prolonged torture and violence.
There is an undeniable truth that a fairly large amount of people lose their lives in extreme sports activities. It is known to all that most extreme sports are carried out in very atrocious natural circumstances which may lead to unpredictable dangers. To make things worse, a fair number of participants hold inadequate knowledge of both the requirements of extreme sports and the skills to tackle emergent problems they will encounter. All those factors together result in the seemingly dangerous-and-demanding sports which are considered a waste of time in people’s mind.
Objectively speaking, participating in extreme sports benefits people in various aspects involving the proof of self-worth and forming valuable characters. As the comment mentions, the television live show of extreme sports is, in some people’s perspective, an awful propaganda of risking lives. We may get back to the basic question that why those people want to risk their lives in such a "meaningless activity". And why should we ban violent sports if people enjoy them so much? You may well ask. The answer is simple: they are uncivilized. For centuries man has been trying to improve himself spiritually and emotionally — admittedly with little success. But at least we no longer tolerate the sight madmen cooped up in cages, or public floggings of any of the countless other barbaric practices which were common in the past. Prisons are no longer the grim forbidding places they used to be. Social welfare systems are in operation in many parts of the world. Big efforts are being made to distribute wealth fairly. These changes have come about not because human beings have suddenly and unaccountably improved, but because positive steps were taken to change the law. The law is the biggest instrument of social change that we have and it may exert great civilizing influence. If we banned dangerous and violent sports, we would be moving one step further to improve mankind. We would recognize that violence is degrading and unworthy of human beings.
It can be inferred from the passage that the author’s opinion of nowadays human being is______.
选项
A、not very high
B、high
C、contemptuous
D、critical
答案
A
解析
作者对当今人类的观点是?文章一开始就点出科技巨大进步,而其他方面进展很少。人们以轻蔑的口气谈及可怜的古罗马人,因为他们欣赏竞技场上的屠杀。我们轻视他们,因为他们把这些屠杀视为娱乐。然而之后又说道,如果我们禁止危险的暴力体育项目,那么我们在改善人类方面又前进了一步。我们会认识暴力是人类的堕落和卑下(人类不应有的)。所以,作者对人类还抱有希望,不是很蔑视。所以选A项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/o8bK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AnumberofyearsagoIsatdownonastonebenchoutsidetheTeatroAvenidainMaputo,Mozambique,whenIworkedasan【M1】_____
AnumberofyearsagoIsatdownonastonebenchoutsidetheTeatroAvenidainMaputo,Mozambique,whenIworkedasan【M1】_____
Peopletendtostrugglewhenlearninganotherlanguage,especiallyiftheyareexposedonlyitwhileattendingclasses.【M1】_____
Americans’circleofcloseconfidantshasshrunkdramaticallyinthepasttwodecadesbutthenumberofpeoplewhosaythey【M1】_
IcametoAfricawithonepurpose:IwantedtoseetheworldoutsidetheperspectiveofEuropeanegocentricity.Icouldhavec
A、Becausethetechnologyisnotmatureenough.B、Becauseitisdifficulttodevelopanonlinetestingprogram.C、Becauseitcost
A、BecauseitisthebestuniversityinCanada.B、Becauseithasthemostbeautifulcampusallovertheworld.C、Becausehercous
鸿渐道:“我忘掉问你,你信上叫我‘同情兄’,那是什么意思?”辛楣笑道:“这是董斜川想出来的,他说,同跟一个先生念书的叫‘同师兄弟’,同在一个学校的叫‘同学’,同有一个情人的该叫‘同情’。”
A、Shehasfewshortcomings.B、Herfranknesssometimesoffendsothers.C、Sheisachampionoftheunderdog.D、Shetendstobean
A、Heneverfeelsroadragewhenheisoutdriving.B、Hesometimesisaggressivewhenheisoutdriving.C、Hemanagestostayin
随机试题
A.干扰核酸和蛋白合成B.选择性抑制真菌甾醇-14α-去甲基酶C.抑制角鲨烯环氧化酶D.结合真菌细胞膜上麦角固醇,破坏细胞膜屏障氟胞嘧啶
车冷硬铸铁车刀切削部分材料一般选用YG、YW及YH类硬质合金。()
按照反应器的结构型式,可把反应器分成釜式、管式、塔式、固定床和流化床。 ()
论述人民政协制度与协商民主之间的关系。
财务报告
具有清胃凉血功用的方剂是
目前感染人类的禽流感病毒亚型中,感染者病情重、死亡率高的是
从估价角度来看,房地产开发商自有资金应得的利息,是其应获得的利润中的一部分。
反压护道可在路堤的一侧或两侧设置,其高度不宜超过路堤高度的(),其宽度应通过稳定计算确定。
又聋又哑的人或者盲人,违反治安管理的,( )处罚。
最新回复
(
0
)