首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the D
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the D
admin
2018-06-29
24
问题
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: " Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
(2) The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved; in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted" , in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the U. S. —meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Orr for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"-—and the Turks with 6. 5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French (or Turkish) every year.
(3) Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media. " You use your wealth to free yourself of the inconvenience of other people," says Halpern. "You ensure you have your own house, and you don’t even have to watch TV with your family because you have five TVs. "
(4) This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether " generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools. We have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
(5) So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man (I have just been sailing on a Dutch ship for a fortnight and the prevailing open-heartedness makes any Briton feel like Scrooge). Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
(6) But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that " generally speaking, people cannot be trusted" are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. Every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. When you give a password to a bank call centre you are displaying trust; tapping your credit-card number on to an Internet site, you affirm the rectitude of a company you have never seen, and rely on the conscientiousness of distant software designers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
(7) But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. U. S. evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear that trust is linked to "social capital" — networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common spaces. There is much discussion in the English-speaking nations about how to "rebuild" social capital, but I was glad to see that the 2002 report was extremely cautious about the ability of policy-makers to change things. The last thing we need is nagging. I also much enjoyed its worried little digression into the negative side of social capital—old-boy networks, micro-communities that exclude outsiders, ethnic ghettos, and so forth.
(8) Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. First, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
Which of the following statements about Scandinavians or Britons is INCORRECT?
选项
A、Scandinavians are generally frank and open.
B、Britons are reluctant to show hospitality.
C、Britons pretend to be shrewd.
D、Britons prefer satirical art.
答案
B
解析
细节题。第五段第二句指出,斯堪的纳维亚人或荷兰人乐于对他人表示信任友爱,并引以为傲,故[A]正确;第四段第四句指出,我们有强大的讽刺文化,吹毛求疵的媒体,不放过涉及私人、公众的任何一次欺骗背叛,故[D]正确;第五段末句指出,而我们英国人更喜欢撅撅嘴、摇摇头,假装精明机智,故[C]正确;文章没有提及[B],故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oEEK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
PassageFourWhatcantheexperienceoftravelingabroadhelpus?
Toavoidthevariousfoolishopinionstowhichmankindisprone,nosuperhumangeniusisrequired.Afewsimpleruleswillkeep
PassageFourWhatdoesparticipationinfolkcustomsmeantopeople?
Americansarestillchucklingaboutthe"pantssuit".Aman—ajudge,noless—suedhisdrycleanersfor$54mforallegedlylosing
Amajoraspectofmanyfirms’marketingstrategiesoverthepastdecadehavebeenthedevelopmentofnewproducts.【M1】______Co
TwoCulturalDimensionsCultureisthecollectiveprogrammingofthemindwhichdistinguishesthemembersofonecategoryofpeo
TwoCulturalDimensionsCultureisthecollectiveprogrammingofthemindwhichdistinguishesthemembersofonecategoryofpeo
TwoCulturalDimensionsCultureisthecollectiveprogrammingofthemindwhichdistinguishesthemembersofonecategoryofpeo
ItisinterestingtoreflectforamomentuponthedifferencesintheareasofmoralfeelingandstandardsinthepeoplesofJa
EnglishBusinessLetterFormatI.Demandsofstationery—businesses:—thefirstpage:paperwiththeprintedletterhead—succee
随机试题
Ifyouareworriedaboutthingsandareunderalotofstressatworkorschool,thenyouareprobablynotsleepingwell.Worry
卫氏并殖吸虫的感染方式是
肿瘤
A.胃黏膜内有大量嗜酸性粒细胞浸润B.黏膜深部的胃体腺或幽门腺囊性扩张C.胃黏膜出血D.胃黏膜表面上皮和腺窝上皮内大量淋巴细胞浸润E.嗜酸性肉芽肿形成出血性胃炎
《中华人民共和国固体废物污染环境防治法》规定:()组织编制城乡建设、土地利用、区域开发、产业发展等规划,应当统筹考虑减少固体废物的产生量和危害性、促进固体废物的综合利用和无害化处置。
某高速公路由地方政府投资建设,并按照相关规定进行公开招投标,在项目招投标环节发生如下事件:事件1:本项目采用公开招标,招标人在当地报纸上发布了招标公告,并规定招标文件出售时间为2个工作日。事件2:招标公告载明了下列内容:(1)招标人的名称和地址。(
常用的授权形式中,()根据银行信用评级政策,对不同信用等级的客户分别授予不同的权限。
人口老龄化是指总人口中因年轻人口数量减少、年长人口数量增加而导致的老年人口比例相应增长的动态过程。国际上通常把60岁以上的人口占总人口比例达到10%,或65岁以上人口占总人口的比重达到7%作为国家或地区进入老龄化社会的标准。我国人口老龄化呈持续加剧之势,截
2010年11月,村民甲承包了本村10亩果园,承包期10年,村民乙承包了本村10亩菜地,承包期5年,该果园和该菜地相邻。甲见乙的承包地里有一口水井,为方便浇灌自己的果园,甲与乙商量支付一定费用从乙承包地里取水浇灌果园,双方最终达成协议:乙同意甲使用其承包地
目前100BASE-T传输介质标准有:______。
最新回复
(
0
)