首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe—the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpetr
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe—the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpetr
admin
2016-03-10
53
问题
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe—the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpetrated on the American people"—remember this: He was once five. That matters, because Inhofe wasn’t merely a lot younger back then, he was a lot wiser—at least where the environment is concerned. That, according to a study from the Teacher Training College in Bilbao Spain, is true not just of the gentleman from Oklahoma, but all of us.
Educators and people who work with small children know that they’re anarchists(无政府主义者)by nature, but children also live in a world full of rules. Some of those rules are taught—raise your hand in class, don’t interrupt other people: some seem more innate—don’t hit other children, don’t hurt animals. As reported in a story, psychologists like to posit the difference between telling a kindergartener that the teacher has suspended the rule against eating snacks in class and telling the same child that the teacher has suspended the no-hitting rule. In the first case, the child will grab the nearest cookie. In the second, the child will typically hesitate and refuse to hit, and may even say the teacher is wrong.
To test where living things fall on this do-no-harm spectrum, Training College researcher Jose Domingo Villaroel assembled a sample group of 118 boys and girls, ages 4 to 7, from local public schools. He started with the basics, showing the kids two sets of four pictures each—a dog, a tree, a bird and a flower: and the sun, clouds, a car and a motorcycle—and asked which of them was alive and which not. As it turned out, the youngest kids particularly would often exclude the tree from the living things category but include the car or the motorcycle.
Villaroel next asked them to respond to two situations. In the first they were presented with a set of social rules(rules against nose-picking and eating sloppily)and a set of interpersonal rules(don’t take other kids’ toys or hurt other kids). In the second they were presented the same social rules and a set of environmental rules(don’t step on flowers, don’t carve your name into a tree with a knife). In both cases they were asked to pick which rules were the worse ones to break. In both cases the social rules were abandoned first.
It was perhaps unsurprising that kids understand intuitively why harming other children is a worse offense than showing bad manners. Even at an early age children have a growing sense of empathy, and they understand what it would feel like to be hit themselves or have a toy taken away. But children aren’t flowers or trees, and yet they showed them equal concern—and that included the kids who didn’t realize that plant life is life at all.
The study is hardly airtight. It’s possible that the children did not give a hoot about the flowers and were just parroting rules they’d been taught or had observed. But they were taught the good-manners rule too. Villaroel wasn’t concerned with whether they understood right and wrong as absolutes, but rather in degrees—which thing was more right or more wrong. And on that metric, nature scored a big win.
There’s a whole lot of developmental ground covered between the time you’re a five-year-old pre-schooler and a 55-year-old policymaker, and our better angels don’t always survive the trip. But it’s encouraging to know we start out with them—and it’s worth trying to hang onto them as long as we can.
The study from the Teacher Training College in Bilbao Spain shows that______.
选项
A、some people were much wiser when they were young
B、climate change is a subject that affects every member of human society
C、climate change is the greatest hoax to people from all over the world
D、people pay less attention to the environment when they become older
答案
D
解析
细节题。作者在第一段以参议员詹姆斯·英霍夫关于环境变化“是对美国人民的最大骗局”的著名论断为例,指出如果在其儿童时期,他会在环境问题上更明智,而这也是西班牙某教师培训学院的一项实验结果。[D]表述准确,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/omPK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingitalicizedpartsindicatesaCAUSE?
The______ofthescientificattitudeisthatthehumanmindcansucceedinunderstandingtheuniverse.
Itisbelievedthatchildrenoftwoorthreeyearsoldareabletolearnanylanguageiftheyare______it.[2002]
IamgladtohearthatJohnfinally______hisownmistakes.[2003]
OrganicCoffeeTodaymanyagriculturalproductsaregrownusingorganicmethodsandcoffeeisnoexception.Organicprod
Itisdoubtful______theworkcanbecompletedontime.
Alovemarriage,however,doesnotnecessarily______muchsharingofinterestsandresponsibilities.
DifferencesBetweenChineseandWesternEatingHabitsTherearegreatdifferencesbetweenChineseandWesterneatinghabits.
IfirstmetAntigonewhenIwasnine.Shejusthungthereonthewall.Hertaskwastoburyherdeadbrother:minewastodusth
Myyoungbrotherhasreallygottenundermyskin.Theunderlinedpartmeans______.
随机试题
菊花按药材产地和加工方法不同,分为“毫菊”“滁菊”“贡菊”“杭菊”“怀菊”。主产于安徽、浙江、江苏、河南等地。多栽培。呈碟形或扁球形,常数个相连成片的菊花品种是
首先应进行下列哪项检查颞下颌关节上腔造影侧位体层闭口位片的正常影像应当是
对细胞内结核菌无效的杀菌剂是
项目建设周期的(),意味着个人及组织之间的关系一般总是新建立的,并具有暂时性。
决策树分析方法是一种常用的决策分析方法,它适用于:()
资料一1994年,电表行业的巨头升达公司决定进军空调行业。由于当时国内空调产品还属于少数人的奢侈品,升达公司与业内其他公司一样,产品定位于比较高档的空调。但因为升达空调没有品牌优势,产品价格与竞争对手不相上下,所以,升达空调在规模上一直没有多大突
()不属于生产物流的基本特征。
求下列不定积分:
在面向对象方法中,类的实例称为______。
A、Inthecornerneartheband.B、Inthecornerbythewindow.C、Atthetablenearthebank.D、Inadarkroom.BWhereweretheys
最新回复
(
0
)