首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Do
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Do
admin
2016-11-03
4
问题
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
(2)The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved: in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted", in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the US—meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Or for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"—and the Turks with 6.5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French(or Turkish)every year.
(3)Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media.
(4)This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether "generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools, we have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
(5)So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man. Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
(6)But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that "generally speaking, people cannot be trusted" are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. For example, every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
(7)But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. US evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear mat trust is linked to "social capital" —networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common places.
(8)Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. Firstly, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
The author’s attitude towards Halpern’s research is that of______.
选项
A、blanket approval
B、slight antipathy
C、strong disapproval
D、slight disapproval
答案
D
解析
第4段首句提到,这项调查的确是有益的,不过有几点要注意;第2句又提到,如果像去年那样……得到的也许是个未经深思熟虑的回答。而末段首句作者说到Halpern的书的结论比自己的更有见地,但……得出两个结论。由此可以判断,作者对这项调查总体是肯定的,只是还有小小的意见要提,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pM7O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TrilogyofDesireincludesallthefollowingEXCEPT
Whichofthefollowingisatypicalethnicdialect?
InAmerica,thethreebiggestnewspapersareofthefollowingEXCEPT
JamesJoyceisarepresentativeofthe"streamofconsciousness"school.HewroteallthefollowingworksEXCEPT
ThelargestuniversityinCanadais_____University.
JohnFirth,MalinowskiandHallidayaretherepresentativesof______School,knownasFunctionalLinguistics.
UnderstandingAcademicLecturesListeningtoacademiclecturesisanimportanttaskforuniversitystudents.Then,howcan
______isaprincipalrepresentativeofTheLondonSchool.
随机试题
中国人民的民族意识开始普遍觉醒是在
债权人提起代位权诉讼时,下列说法正确的有()
修改公司章程必须经过()。
在《声声慢》(寻寻觅觅)中,作者借以抒写家破人亡之痛的主要景物是( )
患者男,45岁。主诉刷牙时牙龈出血,口腔有异味半年。双侧后牙及下前牙轻度松动,伴有咬合痛。为解决该问题,可选择的手术为
关于妊娠滋养细胞疾病,下列哪项是错误的
和项目前评估相比,后评价的最大的特点是()。
设随机变量X~N(μ,42),Y~N(μ,52);记p1=P{X≤μ一4},p2=P{Y≥μ+5},则()
任何一个信息系统的建设都是一项复杂的社会—技术工程,有很多各种知识背景的人员参与。人员之间的交流和通信是一个极其重要的问题。Ⅰ.叙述性文字Ⅱ.动态的工作模型Ⅲ.图形模型Ⅳ.数据字典Ⅴ.逻辑规则在严格定义方法中,通信的基本手段是
在Internet中实现信息浏览查询服务的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)