首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
admin
2013-01-24
57
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere.
For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight.
About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling—and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income— about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding healthcare sector spur the economy—or, through high taxes and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
According to the passage, a big difference between the Bush proposal and the Schwarzenegger proposal is that_____.
选项
A、the latter hides the health-care costs
B、the former hides the health-care costs
C、the latter does better at controlling costs
D、the former does better at controlling costs
答案
A
解析
由第八段可知,布什提议与施瓦辛格提议的一个重要区别是,前者向人们揭示了健康的费用,使人们对该费用有一个清楚的认识,而后者虽然将费用转给了联邦政府、医生或医院,但却使人们对卫生保健产生幻想,认为其费用是低廉的。故A是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pMaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThefirstAmericanpresidentelectedfromtheRepublicanPartywas______.
BlackpeoplewerefirstbroughttoAmericafromAfricaas______.
Twotechniqueshaverecentlybeendevelopedtosimplifyresearchandreducethenumberofnonhumanprimatesneededinstudiesof
Theterm"formallearning"isusedinthispapertorefertoalllearningwhichtakesplaceintheclassroom,withoutregardto
YouaregoingtograduatefromUniversity,andduringtheresttimeyouaremoreconcernedwithyouroccupation.What’syourpla
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofStudyingAbroadDirections:Writeanessayofabout400wordstostateyourview.Inthef
Thatmarriageover,GodwinturnstoAmericaandenrollsinthewritingprogramattheUniversityofIowa.
历史的道路,不是平坦的,有时走到艰难的境界。这是全靠雄伟的精神才能够冲过去的。一条浩浩荡荡的长江大河,有时候到很宽阔的境界,平原无际,一泻万里。有时候流到很逼狭的境界,两岸从山迭岭,绝壁断崖,江河流于期间,回环曲折,及其险峻。民族生命的进展,其经
随机试题
甲企业为增值税一般纳税人,本月发生进项税额1700万元,销项税额5100万元.进项税额转出51万元,同时月末以银行存款缴纳增值税1000万元,那么本月尚未缴纳的增值税为()万元。
个人认为,电动汽车的部件品种应该由企业选择,市场来当裁判员。电池、电机、电控等部件的品种都很多,都应该由企业根据总体设计和市场进行选择,没有必要由标准来越俎代庖。欧、美、日法规当中低速电动车标准里面都没有限定电池,未排斥铅酸电池,而装有铅酸电池的中国品牌低
坚持向科技、教育要警力,要战斗力,把警力的编制、装备水平放在优先发展的战略地位,以适应打击日益严重的职业化、技能化、智能化的刑事犯罪的需要。()
为了更好地开展群众路线实践活动,某单位组织三个部门全部职工去七个社区开展活动,已知三个部门职工人数之比为2:1:3,分布在七个社区的职工数恰成等差数列,则参加活动的职工总人数可能是()。
材料一:我相信,这是美国外交政策的转折点,我现在宣布,不论在什么地方,不论直接或间接侵略威胁了和平,都与美国安全有关。——《杜鲁门回忆录》材料二:尼克松说:“……二、如果
WhattimedidMrSmithphone?
Forsometimepastithasbeenwidelyacceptedthatbabies—andothercreatures—learntodothingsbecausecertainactsleadto
Christmasisthetimetomakethebelovedonesfeelspecial.Ahugandakisswouldprobablybemorethanenoughbutgiftsare
Theathleticprogramisexpectedtobringpublicitytotheschool,attractstudents,fosterstudentunity,andencouragealumni
Hewas(terrible)______treatedbyhisbossandsoresigned.
最新回复
(
0
)