首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Economizing of the Poor Comprehending Economizing of the Poor Walking down the aisles of a supermarket, low-income sho
Economizing of the Poor Comprehending Economizing of the Poor Walking down the aisles of a supermarket, low-income sho
admin
2010-09-25
88
问题
Economizing of the Poor
Comprehending Economizing of the Poor
Walking down the aisles of a supermarket, low-income shoppers must consider a number of factors including quantity, price, quality and nutritional differences when selecting food products. Food-purchase decisions by the poor often entail balances among taste, preference and quality factors— either real or perceived — to meet spending constraints. Within broad product categories such as cereal, cheese, meat and poultry, and fruits and vegetables, shoppers can choose among many substitutable products. Low-income shoppers can extend their food dollars in a number of ways. They may shop in discount food stores; they may purchase and consume less food than higher-income shoppers; they may purchase low-priced (and possibly lower quality) food products; or they may rely on some combination of all three. A better understanding of how the poor economize in food spending addresses important policy questions raised by researchers, nutrition educators, and food-assistance program managers.
The Correlation between the Location and Price
Whether the poor face significantly different food prices due to where they shop for food remains an unresolved empirical question. Extensive research over the years has tried to answer the question — Do the poor pay less for food? The Economic Research Service (ERS) in 1997 received the results of studies comparing price differences in grocery stores across different income levels and combined these with current census data on the distribution of low-income households by urbanization type. The ERS study concluded that, in general, the poor face higher prices due to their greater representation in urban and rural areas (as opposed to suburban areas), where food prices tend to be higher.
Higher Prices but Less Spending
Based on results from household surveys, ERS also found that despite facing higher prices, low-income shoppers spend less than higher-income shoppers for food purchased in food stores. Due to their level of aggregation and lack of in-store sales and promotion information, such surveys shed little light on the economizing practices of households. To learn more about how low-income shoppers spend less for food despite facing higher prices, we obtained food-store purchase data that incorporate per-capita quantity and expenditure-measure equivalents (household measures adjusted for household size) across income levels.
The Main Economizing Practices
The resulting comparisons describe how individuals with different levels of income vary in their food-spending patterns. By using actual transaction data, detailed information about the product purchased (for example, price, product description, package size, and brand name) as well as the condition of purchase (promotion, coupon, or sale item) was obtained. From these, the average unit cost (per ounce, per pound) for each item was calculated. Low-income shoppers may use four primary economizing practices to reduce their food spending. First, they may purchase a greater proportion of discounted products. Second, they may purchase more private-label products (generic or store brand) versus brand products than higher-income shoppers buy. Third, they may take advantage of volume discounts by purchasing larger package sizes. Fourth, they may purchase a less-expensive food product within a product class. Although quality differences such as freshness, convenience and taste often contribute to prices differences, differences in nutritional quality are also evident.
More Spending on Promotional Items
The use of promotions is measured by comparing the percentage of expenditures and quantities of each product purchased on promotion (manufacturers’ coupons, store coupons, store sales, and other promotions). For random-weight cheese, fruit, vegetables and meat in 1998, low-income households (less than $ 25,000 per year) spent a greater share of expenditures for products on promotion than other households. (This is also true for quantities purchased on promotion.) For poultry, however, middle-income households spent about the same percentage on promotion as low-income households (36% versus 35%, respectively). For both groups, spending for promotion items was at least five percentage points more than spending by the high-income group.
Among fixed-weight products, promotion-spending patterns differed. Low-income shoppers purchased the lowest share of total ready-to-eat (RTE) cereal on promotion. This result may be explained by other economizing practices in this product category — such as purchasing a larger percentage of private-label products, which are on promotion less often, but have lower non-sale prices than the brand-name alternatives. Low-income households spent 11.5% of their RTE cereal expenditures on private-label cereals, while the higher-income households spent lower shares, with those shares decreasing with increasing income levels. A similar pattern is found for the quantities of private-label RTE cereal purchased.
Choice of Package Size
Choice of package size also enables those in low-income households to economize by purchasing larger packages, which often have lower per-unit prices than smaller packages. However, data on expenditure shares for RTE cereal and packaged cheese show that low-income households’ purchases of large packages of RTE cereal were less than such purchases by other households in 1998. In 1998, households earning $ 50,000 or more spent 23.1% of cereal purchases on large packages, compared with 15.8% by the low-income group. A similar pattern was found for fixed-weight cheese products.
In fact, low-income households had the lowest proportion of large-package purchase of all income groups. This behavior has three possible explanations: Low-income shoppers do not have access to stores that sell large packages; they cannot afford to store staple products, and they perceive that the cost of storing large packages is higher than the savings from the volume discount. A combination of these constraints likely accounts for much of the observed difference in package size quantities purchased and expenditures on those packages by the different income groups.
Low-income shoppers may also be economizing by purchasing a less costly combination of fruit and vegetable product types. On average, low-income households paid 11.5% less per pound for vegetables than high-income households, and 9.6% less per pound for fruit. This price measurement is a function of the quality and expenditures that each household type devotes to fruits and vegetables. Overall, low-income households purchased 3.3% less fruits and vegetables (by weight) per person than high-income households, but they paid 13% less. This implies that these households are choosing less expensive fruits and vegetables, which saves a lot for them.
Higher-income households purchased less ______ RTE cereal than low-income house-holds.
选项
答案
private-label
解析
参见“More Spending on Promotional Items”小节第二段第四句:Low-income households spent 11.5% of their RTE cereal expenditures on private-label cereals,while the higher-income households spent lower shares...
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pNz7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
ABriefHistoryofAmericanAnti-SmokingCampaignsTheFirstAnti-SmokingTreatiseTobaccoisanativeAmericanplantth
Whileitcan’tyetbesaidthateverymouthfuloffoodhasbeenchangedthroughgeneticengineering,itislikelythatalmostev
Peopleeverywherehungerforcourtesy.Courtesy,politeness,goodmanners--callitwhatyouwill,thesupplyneverseemstoeq
Lastweek,speakersataprograminWashingtondiscussedusingnanotechnology(纳米技术)toimprovehealthcareindevelopingcountr
WorldPopulationGrowthandDistributionTheUnitedNations,anacceptedauthorityonpopulationlevelsandtrends,estimate
A、Themanpreferstohavesomethinglight.B、ThewomanpreferstohavesomethinglightC、Themanishavingastomachache.D、The
A、Tothesupermarket.B、Toschool.C、Toherhome.D、Toworkoutdoors.C
A、Drinking.B、Sleeping.C、Sunbathing.D、Swimming.C
EconomizingofthePoorComprehendingEconomizingofthePoorWalkingdowntheaislesofasupermarket,low-incomeshoppers
Thesituationwillworsen______(除非采取措施加以阻止).
随机试题
金融风险的控制和处理是金融风险管理的对策范畴,是具体实施化解金融风险的对策和方法,一般有()。
学生服从教师,病人服从医生等服从行为,可以用来解释的原因是【】
影响超声造影回声强度的因素是
肺痈成痈期的治法( )。
男,26岁。两小时前突然出现上腹部刀割样疼痛,迅速波及全腹,查全腹压痛、反跳痛、肌紧张,肝浊音界消失,肠鸣音消失,应诊断为
喷锚加固支护的冻结法具有()特点。
第七次咨询:心理咨询师:经过前几次的咨询,我们基本达到了预定的咨询目标,您的情绪、行为有了很大的改变,我为您感到高兴。求助者:谢谢您!心理咨询师:接下来我们将要一起进行咨询效果评估,大概包括六个方面的内容。求助者:正
甲于2008年8月17日上午11时,同装卸工乙、丙等3人驾驶解放牌大卡车由某乡向市里送货(该货车核准载重8吨,该批货物重13吨多)。大卡车超速行驶,当开到某乡政府的十字路口时,将前方同方向骑车的丁连人带车撞出20多米,造成丁重伤(后因抢救不及时,在被他人送
[2008年]设A为n阶非零矩阵,E为n阶单位矩阵,若A3=O,则().
Thefollowingparagraphsaregiveninawrongorder.Youarerequiredtoreorganizetheseparagraphsintoacoherentarticleby
最新回复
(
0
)