首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
admin
2011-03-14
40
问题
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymakers improve on the market outcome? There are no simple answers to these questions.
One source of inefficiency is the markup (涨价) of price over marginal cost. Because of the markup, some consumers who value the good at more than the marginal cost of production (but less than the price) will be deterred (被阻止) from buying it. Thus, a monopolistically competitive market has the normal deadweight loss of monopoly .pricing.
Although tins outcome is clearly undesirable compared to the first-best outcome of price equal to marginal cost, there is no easy way for policymakers to-fix the problem. To enforce marginal-cost pricing, policymakers would need to regulate all firms that produce differentiated products. Because such products are so common in the economy, the administrative burden of such regulation would be overwhelming. Moreover, the regulating monopolistic competitors would entail all the problems of regulating natural monopolies. In particular, because monopolistic competitors are making zero profits already, requiring them to lower their prices to equal marginal cost would cause them to make losses. To keep these firms in business, the government would need to help them cover these losses. Rather than raising taxes to pay for these subsidies, policymakers may decide it is better to live with tile inefficiency of monopolistic pricing
Another way in which monopolistic competition may be socially inefficient is that the number of firms in the market may not be the "ideal" one. That is, there may be too much or too little entry. One way to think about this problem is in terms of the externalities associated with entry. Whenever a new firm considers entering the market with a new product, it considers only the profit it would make. Yet its entry would also have two external effects: a) The product-variety externality: Because consumers get some consumer surplus from the introduction of a new product, there is a positive externality associated with entry b) The business-stealing externality: Because other firms lose customers and profits from the entry of a new competitor, there is a negative externality associated with entry. Thus in a monopolistically competitive market, there are both positive and negative externalities associated with the entry of new firms. Depending on which externality is larger, a monopolistically competitive market could have either too few or too many products. Both of these externalities are closely related to the conditions for monopolistic competition. The former arises because a new firm would offer a product different from those of the existing firms. The latter arises because firms post a price above marginal cost and, therefore, are always eager to sell additional units. Conversely, because perfectly competitive firms produce identical goods and charge a price equal to marginal cost, neither of these externalities exists under perfect competition.
In the end, we can conclude only that monopolistically competitive markets do not have all the desirable welfare properties of perfectly competitive markets. That is, the invisible hand does not ensure that total surplus is maximized under monopolistic competition. Yet because the inefficiencies are subtle, hard to measure, and hard to fix, there is no easy way for public policy to improve the market outcome.
Why is it difficult for public policy to improve the market outcome?
选项
A、Because it is difficult to measure the inefficiencies.
B、Because perfectly competitive firms produce identical goods.
C、Because a new firm would offer a product different from those of the existing firms.
D、Because surplus is maximized under monopolistic competition.
答案
A
解析
文中最后一句中的subtle,hard to measure,and hard to fix,there is no easy way等的意思就是difficult。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pSsa777K
本试题收录于:
MBA联考(英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
MBA联考(英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
寡头垄断厂商的产品是()。
某垄断厂商面临两个完全分割的市场,假设为市场1和市场2,每个市场的需求函数分别为x1=10-p1,x2=5-p2。厂商的边际成本固定为4。(1)求价格歧视下两个市场的产量与价格。(2)求无价格歧视下两个市场的产量与价格。
你认为下面四个寡头垄断行业。哪一个最符合古诺模型?()。
寡头垄断和垄断的主要相同之处是()
Oneofthesaddestthingsabouttheperiodinwhichweliveisthegrowingestrangement(疏远)betweenAmericaandEurope.Thismay
Voiceswere______astheargumentbetweenthetwomotoristsbecamemorebad-tempered.
Itremainstobeseenwhetherthereservesofrawmaterialsintheyear2000willbesufficienttosupplyaworldeconomywhich
Theroleofgovernmentsinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresou
随机试题
洋务派举办军事工业的目的是________、________、________、________。
关于妇女保健,不包括以下哪项内容
关于颈部MRI检查技术,不正确的是
某患者MCH为22pg,MCV为73fl,MCHC为250g/L。可诊断为
鼻腔检查时,患者取坐位或半卧位,进行前鼻镜检查,如出血量较多,可先用指压法压迫止血或()肾上腺素棉片暂时止血,然后查找出血部位;必要时在鼻内镜下寻找
宏观经济学中,经济通常被分为三大部门,下列不属于的是()。
下列各项中,属于速动资产的有()。
甲厂向乙大学发函表示:“我厂生产的B型耳机,每副30元。如果贵校需要,请与我厂联系。”乙大学回函:“我校愿向贵厂订购B型耳机1000副,每副单价30元,但需在耳机上附加一个音量调节器。”2个月后,乙大学收到甲厂发来的1000副耳机,但这批耳机上没有音量调节
一份凭证应纳税额超过100元的,纳税人应当向当地税务机关申请填写缴款书或完税证,将其中一联粘贴在凭证上或者税务机关在凭证上加注完税标记代替贴花。()
马克思主义政治经济学的理论基础是()。
最新回复
(
0
)