首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
admin
2011-03-14
51
问题
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymakers improve on the market outcome? There are no simple answers to these questions.
One source of inefficiency is the markup (涨价) of price over marginal cost. Because of the markup, some consumers who value the good at more than the marginal cost of production (but less than the price) will be deterred (被阻止) from buying it. Thus, a monopolistically competitive market has the normal deadweight loss of monopoly .pricing.
Although tins outcome is clearly undesirable compared to the first-best outcome of price equal to marginal cost, there is no easy way for policymakers to-fix the problem. To enforce marginal-cost pricing, policymakers would need to regulate all firms that produce differentiated products. Because such products are so common in the economy, the administrative burden of such regulation would be overwhelming. Moreover, the regulating monopolistic competitors would entail all the problems of regulating natural monopolies. In particular, because monopolistic competitors are making zero profits already, requiring them to lower their prices to equal marginal cost would cause them to make losses. To keep these firms in business, the government would need to help them cover these losses. Rather than raising taxes to pay for these subsidies, policymakers may decide it is better to live with tile inefficiency of monopolistic pricing
Another way in which monopolistic competition may be socially inefficient is that the number of firms in the market may not be the "ideal" one. That is, there may be too much or too little entry. One way to think about this problem is in terms of the externalities associated with entry. Whenever a new firm considers entering the market with a new product, it considers only the profit it would make. Yet its entry would also have two external effects: a) The product-variety externality: Because consumers get some consumer surplus from the introduction of a new product, there is a positive externality associated with entry b) The business-stealing externality: Because other firms lose customers and profits from the entry of a new competitor, there is a negative externality associated with entry. Thus in a monopolistically competitive market, there are both positive and negative externalities associated with the entry of new firms. Depending on which externality is larger, a monopolistically competitive market could have either too few or too many products. Both of these externalities are closely related to the conditions for monopolistic competition. The former arises because a new firm would offer a product different from those of the existing firms. The latter arises because firms post a price above marginal cost and, therefore, are always eager to sell additional units. Conversely, because perfectly competitive firms produce identical goods and charge a price equal to marginal cost, neither of these externalities exists under perfect competition.
In the end, we can conclude only that monopolistically competitive markets do not have all the desirable welfare properties of perfectly competitive markets. That is, the invisible hand does not ensure that total surplus is maximized under monopolistic competition. Yet because the inefficiencies are subtle, hard to measure, and hard to fix, there is no easy way for public policy to improve the market outcome.
Why is it difficult for public policy to improve the market outcome?
选项
A、Because it is difficult to measure the inefficiencies.
B、Because perfectly competitive firms produce identical goods.
C、Because a new firm would offer a product different from those of the existing firms.
D、Because surplus is maximized under monopolistic competition.
答案
A
解析
文中最后一句中的subtle,hard to measure,and hard to fix,there is no easy way等的意思就是difficult。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pSsa777K
本试题收录于:
MBA联考(英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
MBA联考(英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
垄断厂商采用价格歧视的原则是()。
寡头垄断厂商的产品是()。
已知某垄断厂商的成本函数为TC=Q2+100,产品的需求函数为P=90-Q。(1)计算利润极大时的产量、利润和价格;(2)假设政府限定国内最高售价P=50,国内市场是否会出现超额需求引起的短缺?
你认为下面四个寡头垄断行业。哪一个最符合古诺模型?()。
Oneofthesaddestthingsabouttheperiodinwhichweliveisthegrowingestrangement(疏远)betweenAmericaandEurope.Thismay
Voiceswere______astheargumentbetweenthetwomotoristsbecamemorebad-tempered.
Thehopes,goals,fearsanddesires______widelybetweenmenandwomen,betweentherichandthepoor.
Itremainstobeseenwhetherthereservesofrawmaterialsintheyear2000willbesufficienttosupplyaworldeconomywhich
Theroleofgovernmentsinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresou
随机试题
赔偿请求人请求国家赔偿的时效为________年,自其知道或者应当知道国家机关及其工作人员行使职权时的行为________之日起计算,但被羁押等限制人身自由期间不计算在内。
已知函数f(x)=(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4),则方程f’(x)=0有_________个实根()。
A.大细胞高色素贫血B.正细胞止色素贫血C.小细胞低色素贫血D.小细胞正色素贫血E.大细胞低色素贫血慢性失血所致的贫血
A.急性肝炎B.慢性迁延性肝炎C.慢性活动性肝炎D.急性重症肝炎E.慢性重症肝炎
壮热不退的病机是日晡潮热的病机是
债权人进行财务报表中债权保障程度分析的主要内容是()。[2013年真题]
根据以下资料,回答下列问题。 2009年4月,北京市旅客运输总量约为()亿人。
甲因遭遇海难下落不明,3年后,甲的妻子乙()。
设表的长度为n。在下列算法中,最坏情况下时间复杂度最高的是
"Cool"isawordwithmanymeanings.Itstraditionalmeaningisusedto【36】atemperaturethatisfairlycold.Astheworldhas【3
最新回复
(
0
)