Which of the following can NOT reduce the reliance upon excavation? Why does the conclusion dram from Bahn’s words seem contrad

admin2010-05-05  9

问题 Which of the following can NOT reduce the reliance upon excavation?
Why does the conclusion dram from Bahn’s words seem contradictory?

选项 A、More analysis can be done with less samples.
B、Excavation diminishes with improved technology.
C、Better materials can be obtained from painstaking excavation.
D、Excavation is time-consuming but fruitless.

答案A

解析 本题问为什么说从巴恩的话得出的结论看起来是自相矛盾的。首段中提到:一方面挖掘考古已经变得很慢而且非常仔细,另一方面,从现在已有的东西中可以获得更多的信息。从中可以看出虽然挖掘活动进展慢了,但获得的信息却增加了,也就是说,在同样的试样下能够分析出更多的结果。因此"更多的分析可以在样本减少的情况下做出"正确。随着技术的进步挖掘减少了:巴恩并没有提及关于技术的问题。通过煞费苦心的挖掘可以得到更好的材料:巴恩只提到了挖掘之艰苦,而没有说这样可以得到更好的文物。挖掘很费时但是徒劳无功:巴恩只提到了挖掘的煞费苦心,没有提到其结果。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pT44777K
0

最新回复(0)