首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
41
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial viewpoints on the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on cancer
答案
D
解析
主旨大意题。第一段第一句就提出问题,电会引发癌症吗?接下来的第一、二段肯定了电与癌症之间的联系。而第三至最后一段则否定了二者之间的联系。由此可归纳,文章的主旨是电与癌症之间的关系存在不同的看法,故答案为[D]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/paua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Anyonewhohasfollowedrecenthistoricalliteraturecantestifytotherevolutionthatistakingplaceinhistoricalstudies.T
Theyoungloverswerenotallowedtogetmarriedbecausetheirtwofamilieswere______enemies.
Mencannotmanufacturebloodasefficientlyaswomencan.Thismakessurgeryriskierformen.Menalsoneedmoreoxygenbecause
Thisyearsometwenty-threehundredteenagersfromallovertheworldwillspendabouttenmonthsinU.S.homes.Theywillatte
"Howmanycopiesdoyouwantprinted,Mr.Greeley?""Fivethousand!"Theanswerwassnappedbackwithouthesitation."But,
Inthenextfewweeksconsumerspendingwillincreaseby7%inAmerica,______withlastyear,accordingtoaconsumersurveyby
Itadvocatedbythebookthataman,nomatterhow______hisoriginmaybe,canbesuccessfulwithunremittingeffortsandstron
Generouspublicfundingofbasicsciencewould______considerablebenefitsforthecountry’shealth,wealthandsecurity.
ForalltheirContinental______,Europeanscanberemarkablylaxaboute-mailsecurity.
Thesun,rain,andfrosthaddamagedthe________wallofthisoldbuilding.
随机试题
A.氧合血红蛋白B.去氧血红蛋白C.氨基甲酸血红蛋白D.一氧化碳血红蛋白E.高铁血红蛋白分子结构较疏松的血红蛋白构型是
与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的临床表现不符的是
腮腺区肿胀、压痛,导管口正常,抗感染治疗有效,分泌物清亮、通畅。应初步考虑为
若开标后中标人发现自己的报价存在严重的误算和漏算,因而拒绝与业主签订施工合同,这一对策为()。
效用是()。
魏晋南北朝时期著名的“三曹”分别指曹操、曹丕、曹植。他们的文学代表作分别是()。
社会化是人们形成社会认可的社会行为模式和对社会环境中的各种刺激给予合适稳定反应的过程。法律社会化是指个体形成某一特定社会要求的法律观念和遵守法律行为的过程。根据上述定义,下列属于法律社会化的是:
n阶实对称矩阵A正定的充分必要条件是().
以下描述中正确的是
WhydidShermanAleksyonlytakedayjobs?
最新回复
(
0
)