首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
34
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial viewpoints on the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on cancer
答案
D
解析
主旨大意题。第一段第一句就提出问题,电会引发癌症吗?接下来的第一、二段肯定了电与癌症之间的联系。而第三至最后一段则否定了二者之间的联系。由此可归纳,文章的主旨是电与癌症之间的关系存在不同的看法,故答案为[D]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/paua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
ThedoctorassuredVictorthathiswifewouldcertainly______althoughshehadbeenunconsciousfor48hours.
Thecomingoftherunwaysinthe1830’s______oursocietyandeconomiclife.
Thisyearsometwenty-threehundredteenagersfromallovertheworldwillspendabouttenmonthsinU.S.homes.Theywillatte
Theproliferationofweaponsofmassdestructionwillnotbestoppedby______,norwillterrorismbeendedbytheincarceration
Wedidholdameetingyesterday,butyou______,sowedidnotinformyou.
Inmodernsociety,workersareindangerofbeing______.Theybecomeextensionofthemachine.(human)
Ifanydamagetothegoodsoccurs,aclaimmay______theinsuranceagentatyourend,whowillundertaketocompensateyoufort
Theboarddeemediturgentthatthesefiles______rightaway.
Theinkhadfadedwithtime,andsopartsoftheletterwere______.
随机试题
在常见信息安全技术中,VPN是指______。
简述建筑艺术韵概念及分类。
下列有关诊断性刮宫患者的术后护理措施,正确的是
A.固有层以T淋巴细胞为主的炎症细胞浸润B.固有层或黏膜下层有淋巴滤泡形成C.上皮下结缔组织中血管内发生玻璃样变、血管周有淋巴细胞浸润D.上皮内发生棘层松解和上皮内疱形成E.上皮基底细胞极性消失慢性盘状红斑狼疮
7个月婴儿,医院出生,根据其免疫特点和传染病发生的情况,完成计划免疫和预防接种应不包括
关于保险合同的基本条款,下列说法不正确的是( )。
在接站地到饭店途中的旅行车上,全陪代表_______社和_______向旅游团致欢迎词,内容包括:表示欢迎、自我介绍和介绍地陪、表示提供服务的真诚愿望和预祝旅行顺利愉快等。
简述储存策略的作用。
英语、德语都属于()语系,()语族。
Primaryschoolteachers’poor【C1】______ofEnglishandmathsisunderminingtheGovernment’sliteracyandnumeracystrategies,
最新回复
(
0
)