首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
admin
2015-01-27
38
问题
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO— has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expectations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s)with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategies, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors— their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid " nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What can we learn about Recruitment Process Outsourcing in the first paragraph?
选项
A、All companies tend to outsource their not so important services.
B、It gained wide acceptance among the employers as soon as it came out.
C、Recruiting is an important department of many organisations.
D、It took a long time before RPO finally became popular.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段提到“Recruitment Process Outsourcing--better known as RPO--hasgained significant market momentum in recent years.Yet it has taken a while.”即:招聘流程外包在近几年赢得了很好的发展势头,但是这个过程也花费了一段时间。所以,D项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pg7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopic
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.Technology:theimportanceoftrainingstaffinhowto
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.Careerdevelopment:theimportanceofacquiringarange
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Stuffmanagement:howtoattractandretainhigh-caliberemployeesB:Recruitment:wh
随机试题
A、bankruptB、nothingC、EnglandD、functionB
A、1天B、2天C、3天D、5天E、7天流脑隔离至症状消失后
在交流变频调速装置中,被普遍采用的交一交变频器,实际上就是将其直流输出电压按正弦波调制的可逆整流器。因此网侧电流会含有大量的谐波分量,下列关于谐波电流的描述,哪一项是不正确的?()
A公司某项目部承建一供水厂扩建工程,主要内容为新建一座钢筋混凝土水池,长32m,宽40m,池体深6.5m,基坑与邻近建筑物距离2.6m,设计要求基坑用灌注桩作为围护结构,搅拌桩作止水帷幕。项目部制定了详细的施工组织设计,其中水池浇筑方案包含控制混凝土入模温
资本资产定价模型虽然在实际运用中存在一些局限性,但仍然能确切地揭示证券市场的一切。()
存货跌价准备—经计提,在持有期间不得转回。()
小刚的腿有残疾,具有接受普通教育的能力。该上小学了,当地普通学校以小刚腿有残疾为由,拒绝其入校学习。该做法()
侦查人员讯问犯罪嫌疑人时,下列表述中错误的是()。
Thebiggestdangerfacingtheglobalairlineindustryisnottheeffectsofterrorism,war,SARSandeconomicdownturn.Itisth
下面描述中,符合结构化程序设计风格的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)