首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to approach Reading Test Part Three • In this part of the Reading Test you read a longer text and answer six questions. • Fi
How to approach Reading Test Part Three • In this part of the Reading Test you read a longer text and answer six questions. • Fi
admin
2010-01-28
54
问题
How to approach Reading Test Part Three
• In this part of the Reading Test you read a longer text and answer six questions.
• First read the questions, Try to get an idea of what the text will be about. Then read the text for general understanding,
• Then read the text and questions more carefully, choosing the best answer to each question. Do not choose an answer just because you can see the same words in the text.
• Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below.
• For each question 15 - 20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Not long ago innovation was The Big Idea in marketing circles. Now, however, it’s hard to see the benefits of this rush to innovate. Indeed if anything, companies seem to be drawing back from innovation, not charging ahead. But just a few years ago many companies were combining a commitment to create entirely new product categories through innovative technologies - working to hugely ambitious growth targets -with a root-and-branch organisational overhaul designed to free up creativity and speed new product roll-outs.
The result was that as resources were shifted away from core businesses, sales and profits faltered, share prices slumped and CEOs were ousted. Now the mantra is a more conservative focus on the top brands, the top retail customers and the top markets. It’s being rewarded in many cases by healthier share prices. This sustained effort to cut long tails of smaller brands and focus marketing resource on existing leaders seems to be paying off.
So were we wrong to pinpoint innovation as key to tong-term market success? Surely not. But we might have underestimated the enormous complexity of this beast. The term ’innovation’ may be simple enough but it spans a vast landscape, including the type and degree of innovation, marketing purpose, management process and market circumstance - not all of which are well understood.
Take ’type’ of innovation. Are we talking about new products only? Or new processes, new channels, underlying technologies, organisational structures and business models? When should the innovation involve a new brand? Or take ’degree’. Are we aiming for blue-sky inventions that will transform markets and create new categories? Or marginal tweaks in, say, formulation or packaging that give us an excuse to advertise something ’New! Improved!’? Likewise, is the marketing purpose of the project to steal a march on competitors and drive incremental growth, or to update an obsolete product line and play catch-up to competitors? As one business news editorial complained, ’innovation’ is often just ’simple proliferation of similar products’. Then there’s process. What is the best way to manage this particular innovation? Is it to employ creative revolutionaries and set them free, or is disciplined risk management, requiring the careful testing and sifting of options to pick winners, a better approach? In larger organisations, has, senior management really made time spent in cross4unctional teams a recognised element of successful career paths? What time frames (eg payback periods) and degrees of risk is senior management comfortable with? And does the organisation have a culture that fits the chosen approach? Does it ’celebrate failure’, for example, or is it actually a risk-averse blame culture (despite what the CEO says in the annual report)?
Successful innovation requires clearing two hurdles. First, it needs the right project with the right degree of innovation to fit with the right marketing purpose, the right innovation process, corporate culture and market circumstance. Second, it needs senior managers that understand the interplay between these different factors, so that rather than coming together simply by chance, they are deliberately brought together in different ways to meet different circumstances.
Clearing Hurdle Two can happen ’by accident’. Clearing Hurdle One requires real skill We can all point to admirable, inspiring innovations. But how many companies can we point to and say, ’these people have mastered the art of innovation’? Brilliant innovations are a wonderful thing, Expert innovation management is even better and much rarer.
According to the fourth paragraph, companies should ensure that
选项
A、their approach to risk management is fully new.
B、the progress of an innovation is as speedy as possible.
C、their new products are radically different from competitors’.
D、the benefits of participating in teamwork are fully acknowledged.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pwKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 A因为是由Do开头的疑问句,所以答案就要以Yes/No开头。所以正确答案是(A)。在把article错误地理解成“物品”而不是“文章”时,容易误将(B)和(C)当做答案。
Yourcompanyhasfoundthatineffectivetimemanagementisoneofthemajorproblemareasthrough-outtheworkforce.Youhaveb
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.Technology:theimportanceoftrainingstaffinhowto
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Themanagement;howtotreatyouremployeeswithTLC(TenderLovingCare)B:Custo
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Customerrelations:howtodefuseangrycustomersB:Recruitment:howtohireane
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages,listedA—H.•Foreachextract,choosetheadv
随机试题
A、2~10℃B、10~30℃C、<20℃D、遮光、<20℃E、巴曲酶冷处贮存应()。
关于职业禁止,下列哪一选项是正确的?()(2016/2/9)
资本是投资者为开展生产经营活动而投入的资金。会计上的资本指的是投资者投入的资本,包括所有者投入的资本和债权人投人的资本。()
纳税人将其开采的矿产品原矿自用于连续生产精矿产品,无法提供移送使用原矿数量的,可将其精矿按折算率折算成原矿数量,以此作为销售数量。()
从业人员践行职业道德规范——“奉献”的要求不包括()。
从所给四个选项中.选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
在某些国人眼里,诺贝尔文学奖似乎成了政治奖。2006年年底,某师范大学中文系一位吴姓教授,在杂志上发表文章《诺贝尔文学奖的中国迷局》,所言颇有代表性。文中铁口独断:“在可预见的将来,中国不会出现诺贝尔文学奖的获奖作家。……我对中国作家写出诺奖认为的‘政治正
x是实数.则x的取值范围是(0,1).(1)x<.(2)2x>x2.
法和其他社会规范都具有()
1原式
最新回复
(
0
)