2. 外语
  3. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indi

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indi

admin2018-11-30  16
问题 In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.
选项 A、that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
B、that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
C、two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
D、on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
E、on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
答案A
解析 根据题意，排除D、E用on的用法；C中用owe sth．to do的用法大错特错，因为owe sth．to中的to是介词，而非动词不定式的标志。B、C中的unlawful之前的their是多余的；同时，their的出现使得指代混乱；本来句末未划线部分的their很清楚地指代three tribes，而B、c在unlawful之前加上their，此their却是指代New York counties；这样使得后一个未划线的their与此their指代不一致，产生指代矛盾。A为正确答案，for短语的逻辑主语明确，是two counties。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/q6kO777K
本试题收录于： GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0

GMAT VERBAL

GMAT

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)