首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
admin
2011-12-20
44
问题
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinctive activity. No other discipline has produced as much in such a short period. It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time, but for sheer industry, the business school deserve credit. Not a day goes by without another wave of research papers, books, articles, and journals.
In these terms, schools have produced a generally accepted theoretical basis for management. When it comes to knowledge creation, however, they find themselves in difficulties. They are caught between the need for academic rigour and for real-world business relevance, which tend to pull in opposite directions. The desire to establish management as a credible discipline leads to research that panders to traditional academic criteria. The problem for business school researchers is that they seek the approval of their academic peers rather than the business community. In the United States this has led to the sort of grand ’paper clip counting’ exercises that meet demands for academic rigour but fail to add one iota to the real sum of human knowledge.
Business schools have too often allowed the constraints of the academic world to cloud their view of the real world. Business school researchers seek provable theories rather than helpful theories. They have championed a prescriptive approach to management based on analysis and, more recently, on fashionable ideas that soon disappear into the ether. The one best way approach encourages researchers to mould the idiosyncrasies of managerial reality into their tightly defined models of behaviour. Figures and statistics are fitted into linear equations and tidy models. Economists and other social scientists label this cure smoothing. Meanwhile, reality continually refuses to cooperate.
Central to this is the tension between relevance and rigour. In a perfect world, there would be no need to choose between the two. But in the business school world, the need to satisfy academic criteria and be published in journals often tilts the balance away from relevance. In other words, it is often easier to pursue quantifiable objectives than it is to add anything useful to the debate about management. To a large extent, the entire business school system works against useful, knowledge-creating research. Academics have five years in which to prove themselves if they are to make the academic grade. It seems long enough. But it can take two or even three years to get into a suitable journal. They therefore have around three years, probably less, to come up with an area of interest and carry out meaningful and original research. This is a demanding timescale. The temptation must be to slice up old data in new ways rather than pursue genuinely groundbreaking, innovative research.
It is a criticism also made by some business school insiders. "Academic journals tend to find more and more techniques for testing more and more obscure theories. They are asking trivial questions and answering them exactly. There has to be a backlash," says Julian Birkinshaw of London Business School. In large part, the problem goes back to a time when business schools were trying to establish themselves. Up until the 1960s, American business schools were dismissed as pseudo-academic institutions, including the universities of which they often formed a part, regarded them as a little more than vocational colleges. Since then, most of the leading schools have undergone major reassessments and introduced sweeping changes. However, it is questionable whether those changes have gone far enough.
In the third paragraph, the writer says that the business school system causes academics to ______.
选项
A、be satisfied with reinterpreting previous research
B、avoid complicated business issues
C、concentrate on very narrow fields of study
D、focus on topics no longer relevant to business needs
答案
B
解析
第三段第二句,作者认为商业学校专注于可以证明的理论,并在第三句中指出他们的研究基于分析和暂时出现的流行现象,倒数第三句指出“Figures and statistics are fitted into linear equations and tidy models.”,这些都说明他们分析的是简单的问题,而避免研究复杂问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qDua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
ItusedtobesaidthatEnglishpeopletaketheirpleasuressadly.Nodoubtthiswouldstillbetrueiftheyhadanypleasurest
Nationalism
中国国际进口博览会(ChinaInternationalImportExpo,简称CIIE)。2017年5月,习近平主席在“一带一路”国际合作【R31】________上宣布,中国将从2018年起举办中国国际进口博览会。2018年
中非合作论坛(ForumonChina-AfricaCooperation,简称FOCAC),是中华人民共和国和非洲国家之间在南南合作范畴内的集体对话机制,成立于2000。论坛的宗旨是平等【R21】________、增进了解、扩大【R22】_____
Tomhardlyseemsmiddle-aged,______old.
Sincethelate1970’sinthefaceofaseverelossofmarketshareindozensofindustries,manufacturersintheUnitedStatesh
Globalwarmingwasonceanuncommontermusedbyafewscientistswhoweregrowingconcernedovertheeffectsofdecadesofpoll
A______isagrowthoffeathers,furorskinalongthetopoftheheadsofsomeanimals,especiallybirds.
Sheflewintoa______whennobodywouldlendheranymoney.
随机试题
大豆中含有较多的________。
B受体阻断药治疗心力衰竭药物的主要作用原理是
下列关于支气管扩张的典型病理表现正确的有
投标文件中经济部分包括()等内容。
初步设计完成后,投资方案的要点就确定了,根据批准的初步设计,建设单位即可着手进行投资准备工作。投资准备的主要工作内容包括()等。
基金市场营销的内容主要包括()。
复效优于重新投保的原因有()。
集体合同中双方约定的劳动报酬和劳动条件等标准可以低于当地人民政府规定的最低标准。()
某居民小区位于本市郊区外环线边缘,小区内有住户1840户,长住居民5300多人,基本上是由二十世纪五六十年代支边支农回城的人员、动迁人员和外地人住人员组成。小区人员有三大特点:一是无业和生活困难的居民多;二是六十岁以上的老人多;三是外来人员多。小区接到上级
运算结果是字符串“home”的表达式是( )。
最新回复
(
0
)