首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
admin
2015-03-29
81
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used—and, in many cases, the only—source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance, the ratings must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what we’ve learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the students’ level, professional behaviour in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject.
The word "approached" in paragraph 2 means______.
选项
A、increased
B、came near
C、equalled
D、required
答案
B
解析
本题考查动词approach的含义,解题时可根据approach的常见含义“接近”进行推测,也可在原句中用各选项替换approach一词,很容易得出答案为B)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qKfK777K
本试题收录于:
浙江省大学英语三级题库大学英语三级分类
0
浙江省大学英语三级
大学英语三级
相关试题推荐
英国的小学教师们正在尝试在课堂上使用随身摄像头,记录表现差的孩子们的行为。【T1】英格兰至少有两家学校已经引进了这种设备进行持续录像,这已经得到了当地教育部门的同意(withtheconsentof)。《泰晤士报》报道说,这种摄像头装在教师的衣服上,
PierreOmidyar,thesonofFrench-Iranianimmigrants,wasalreadyamillionairebeforehelaunchedeBay.Omidyar’selectronicss
WhenIwasachild,myfamilyusedtogoonholidayeveryyeartovisitourrelativesinthenorth-eastofEngland.Oneofthem
在测试阅读、数学和科学素养的国际学生评估项目(PISA)中,部分表现最优秀的孩子来自亚洲国家。【T1】亚洲人认为,让儿童从早期开始就接受优质教育会令其长大后有更加出色的表现。【T2】中国、日本和韩国采用了相同的学前教育体系,为儿童提供进一步学习所需的知
What’stherangeofyuanfluctuationwithinatradingday?
What’stherangeofyuanfluctuationwithinatradingday?
What’stherangeofyuanfluctuationwithinatradingday?
A、Achurch.B、Aschool.C、Ashop.D、Apark.B题目问男士想去什么地方。对话中男士问如何去剑桥语言学院。故选B。
A、£16.50.B、£12.50.C、£10.D、£15.D题干问男士门票的价格。通过对话内容可知,女士说前排和包厢最责,为16.50英镑。正厅中间的座位售价为15英镑,三个后排座位售价为12.50英镑。男士要一个中间的座位。故选D。
AnintrepidEskimoleaveshisiglooandtravels12kilometersnorth,12kilometerseastand12kilometersnorthagaintoreacht
随机试题
食品出厂的检验报告的结论是依据()对食品质量和标识标签做出的是否合格的终结性判定。
根据我国票据法,汇票保证人为2人以上的,保证责任的承担规则为()
现场急救应首选该患者双下肢烧伤深度为
A.羚角钩藤汤B.紫雪C.镇肝熄风汤D.苏合香丸E.生脉散
A.参苓白术散B.归脾汤C.生脉散D.炙甘草汤E.玉屏风散
药物作用的两重性指()。
若两个点电荷连线中点处的场强为零,则表明两个点电荷是()的电荷。
道德与法律的联系不包括()。
红细胞是血液中数量最多的一种血细胞,它在人体中的主要作用是()。
AccordingtotheUNHumanDevelopmentReport,whichisthebestplaceforwomenintheworld?
最新回复
(
0
)