首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Why the inductive and mathematical sciences, after their first rapid development at the culmination of Greek civilization, advan
Why the inductive and mathematical sciences, after their first rapid development at the culmination of Greek civilization, advan
admin
2010-01-18
37
问题
Why the inductive and mathematical sciences, after their first rapid development at the culmination of Greek civilization, advanced so slowly for two thousand years--and why in the following two hundred years a knowledge of natural and mathematical science has accumulated, which so vastly exceeds all that was previously known that these sciences may be justly regarded as the products of our own times--are questions which have interested the modern philosopher not less than the objects with which these sciences are more immediately con versant. Was it the employment of a new method of research, or in the exercise of greater virtue in the use of the old methods, that this singular modern phenomenon had its origin? Was the long period one of arrested development, as in the modern era one of normal growth? Or should we ascribe the characteristics of both periods to so-called historical accidents--to the influence of conjunctions in circumstances of which no explanation is possible, save in the omnipotence and wisdom of a guiding Providence?
The explanation which has become commonplace, that the ancients employed deduction chiefly in their scientific inquiries, while the moderns employ induction, proves to be too narrow, and fails upon close examination to point with sufficient distinctness the contrast that is evident between ancient and modern scientific doc- trines and inquires. For all knowledge is founded on observation, and proceeds from this by analysis and syn thesis, by synthesis and analysis, by induction and deduction, and if possible by verification, or by new appeals to observation under the guidance of deduction--by steps which are indeed correlative parts of one method; and the ancient sciences afford examples of every one of these methods, or parts of one method, which have been generalized from the examples of sciences.
A failure to employ or to employ adequately anyone of these partial methods, an imperfection in the arts and resources of observation and experiment, carelessness in observation, neglect of relevant facts, vagueness and carelessness in the reasoning, and the failure to draw the consequences of theory and test them by appeal to experiment and observation--these are the faults which cause all failures to ascertain truth, whether among the ancients or the moderns; but this statement does not explain why the modern is possessed of a greater virtue, and by what means he attained his superiority. Much less does it explain the sudden growth of science in recent times.
The attempt to discover the explanation of this phenomenon in the antithesis of "facts" and "theories" or "facts" and "ideas"--in the neglect among the ancients of the former, and their too exclusive attention to the latter proves also to be too narrow, as well as open to the charge of vagueness. For, in the first place, the antithesis is not complete, facts and theories are not coordinate species. Theories, if true, are facts--a particular class of facts indeed, generally complex ones, but still facts. Facts, on the other hand, even in the narrowest signification of the word, if they are at all complex, and if a logical connection subsists between their constituents, have all the positive attributes of theories.
Nevertheless, this distinction, however inadequate it may be to explain the source of the true method in science, is well founded, and connotes an important character in true method. A fact is a proposition of which the verification by an appeal to the primary sources of our knowledge or to experience is direct and simple. A theory, on the other hand, if true, has all the characteristics of a fact, except that its verification is possible only by indirect, remote, and difficult means. To convert theories into facts is to add simple verification, and the theory thus acquires the full characteristics of a fact.
According to the passage, we may state that ______.
选项
A、modern scientists and the ancient philosophers used similar techniques
B、the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning is non-existent
C、the ancient philosophers and scientists were primarily interested in "theories"
D、it is easy to convert "theory" into fact
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。在原文的倒数第二段,作者提出古代人忽视事实,把注意力集中在理论上。因此C是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qfvO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Everygenerationhasitsemblematicboy’stoy.onceuponatimetherewasthegolfcart:alittletoycarspecificallydesigned
Middlebornchildrenwilltellyouthattheyusuallydidn’tfeelallthatspecialwhilegrowingup.Thefirstbornhadhisspot-
A、Idon’tthinkweshouldopenourlocalbranchhereinShanghai.B、IcannotappointMr.Browntothepostalthoughhewasborn
A、Theshipcrewignoredrepeatedwarnings.B、Thepassengersdidnotlistentothecaptain.C、Thecrewrefusedtoobeythecaptai
Doctorsalonemustmakethefinaldecisionwhethertowithdrawtreatment,includingartificialfeeding,andallowaterminallyi
Iftreesfallinthemiddleofacity,doesanyonemakeasound?Sofar,notmuchofone—andthat’saproblem.Tomostofus,ci
A、Financial.B、Personnel.C、Strategy.D、Technology.C
Thereisevidencetobelievethatgamblinginmanyformshasbeenengagedinforalmostaslongascivilization.Eveninprimiti
Themainlightsourceofthefuturewillalmostsurelynotbeabulb.Itmightbeatable,awall,orevenafork.
Theterm"Americandream"wasfirstusedin【B1】______inanovelwrittenbyHoratioAlger:RaggedDick.Themessagewas:Nomatte
随机试题
九点法面积井网的中心注水井距角井距离大于注水井距边井距离,所以,在油层性质变化不大时,边井往往()收到注水效果,角井在其后见效。
男性患者,45岁。甲状腺肿块4个月入院。查体:甲状腺右下叶可扪及2.0cm×2.5cm×3.0cm的肿块,质地硬、表面不光滑,无压痛,肿块随吞咽活动度差。查血T3、T4正常,吸131I率2小时为22%,24小时为35%。甲状腺核素扫描提示为冷结节。此病例最
关于胎盘生乳素(HPL)描述正确的是
对考核不合格的医师,卫生行政部门应给予
关于民事权利,下列哪些选项是正确的?
甲于3月10日将自己的一套商品房出售与乙,双方约定,房屋总价100万元,乙在7月10日前分四期付清,届时再办理房屋过户手续。为保障乙的利益,双方办理了预告登记。4月10日,甲又自行将该套房屋出卖给丙,双方签订了房屋买卖合同,丙交付了全部房款,但未办理过户登
(2004)某大城市CBD中心区设计了超高层的旅馆式公寓,带有1~3层的商业建筑裙房。以下对该建筑的叙述哪条是不合适的?
盈亏平衡点反映了技术方案对市场变化的()。
孔孟被“硬捏合拢”说,是施蛰存先生在20世纪90年代初提出来的。仅凭这一点,即可知施先生对古代文史的造诣非同一般。施蛰存说:“孔孟思想,是一种思想,还是两种思想?天下没有两个思想相同的人,孔孟思想,毕竟还是两家。"(施蛰存《闲话孔子》,原载1991年第1期
依照我国继承法的规定,遗产的范围包括()。
最新回复
(
0
)