首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2019-08-27
51
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads — against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U.S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出1896年,在被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有一半涉及铁路,但铁路经常会赢。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qzTO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Manylanguageteachersandlearnerstendtoaskthequestion:Whyshouldweteachorlearnlinguistics?Sincelinguisticsisdef
Lawsofcompulsiveschoolingfunnelchildrenintoschoolataprescribedageirrespectiveofwhethertheyareready.Manypa
SomeAfricanAmericanshavehadaprofoundimpactonAmericansociety,changingmanypeople’sviewsonrace,historyandpolitic
"GangnamStyle",the______popularsongfromSouthKoreanrecordingartistPSYhasjustbecomethemostwatchedvideoonYouTube
Ironically,theintellectualtoolscurrentlybeingusedbythepoliticalrighttosuchharmfuleffectoriginatedontheacademic
Theyearsbetween1870and1895broughtenormouschangestothetheaterintheUnitedStatesastheresidentcompanywasundermi
Althoughmostbirdshaveonlya______senseofsmell,theyhaveacutevision.
Theschemeforrebuildingthecitycenter______,owingtotherefusalofacounciltosanctiontheexpenditureofthemoneyitw
TheSupremeCourt’sdecisionsonphysician-assistedsuicidecarryimportantimplicationsforhowmedicineseekstorelievedying
明末清初之际,中国与欧美国家之间开始了具有近代意义的文化交流,这就是西方近代科学知识的东渐和以儒学为中心的中国传统文化的西传。对中国来说,这是继印度佛教文化传入中国之后,中国文化又一次大规模地对外来文化的吸收时期。在明末清初的100多年间,伴随着西方传教士
随机试题
甲状腺对称性重度肿大,回声不均匀。CDFI血流信号极丰富,应考虑
A、用于治疗耐青霉素金黄色葡萄球菌引起的严重感染B、对铜绿假单胞菌有杀灭作用,且不易产生耐药性C、用于治疗沙眼、结膜炎等眼部感染D、可影响儿童骨、牙生长E、急、慢性金黄色葡萄球菌性骨髓炎的首选药林可
男性患者,25岁,反复上腹隐痛3年,多在夜间发生,钡餐造影见十二指球部有一龛影。
男,30岁,反复发作肉眼血尿,感染后加重,无水肿、高血压及肾功能减退,最可熊的诊断是
杨某2001年10月18日因犯抢劫罪、盗窃罪被某市中级人民法院判处死刑,缓期二年执行,剥夺政治权利终身。2003年2月,杨某在银川监狱服刑期间,在铸造车间工具房后搭建一木棚,利用休息和请假之机,在木棚内向北监墙方向挖地道,企图通过地道逃跑。2003年3月9
下面对风险因素的描述中,不正确的是()。
在以下进出口货物中,不属于一般进出口货物的是()。
关系营销在()表现得最为突出。
旅游者在自由活动中丢失,地陪应该怎样做()
Whowouldbeinterestedinthead?
最新回复
(
0
)