首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2019-08-27
92
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads — against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U.S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出1896年,在被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有一半涉及铁路,但铁路经常会赢。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qzTO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Shehasbecomequite______tothecompany.
Seekingacompetitiveadvantage,someprofessionalservicefirms(forexample,firmsprovidingadvertisingaccounting,orhealth
Duringrecentyearswehaveheardmuchabout"race":howthisracedoescertainthingsandthatracebelievescertainthingsand
Ithasbeenrevealedthatnearlyoneinfivedegreecourseshasbeen______sincethetriplingoftuitionfeesto£9,000ayear.
Thedimensionsoftourismareastonishing.In2012,theU.N.tourismorganizationcelebratedreaching1billioninternationalt
Tocallsomeonebird-brainedinEnglishmeansyouthinkthatpersonissillyorstupid.Butwillthisdescriptionsoondisappear
Theschemeforrebuildingthecitycenter______,owingtotherefusalofacounciltosanctiontheexpenditureofthemoneyitw
Itissuggestedthatallgovernmentministersshould______informationtotheirfinancialinterests.
Thesteamcan______electricitybyturninganelectricgenerator.
Theywereforcedto______onnecessitiesinordertomaketheirlimitedsupplieslastthelongishwinter.
随机试题
压力表使用范围通常为全量程的1/2-1/3之间。
下列哪项不符合醋酸AS-D萘酚酯酶(AS-DNAE)染色结果
工程总承包单位将部分工程依法分包,王某是分包单位的项目负责人,则王某工资收入应缴纳的个人所得税应由( )。
国有企业甲、合伙企业乙、自然人丙拟共同投资设立一合伙企业。根据《合伙企业法》的规定,下列关于该合伙企业设立及相关事项的表述中,不正确的是()。
物业管理安全防范主要包括()等方面。
在逻辑结构设计中,关系已达到规范化,但因某些属性过多时,可将它分为两个或多个关系模式,这叫做
请使用VC6或使用【答题】菜单打开考生文件夹proj1下的工程proj1,此工程中含有一个源程序文件proj1.epp。其中位于每个注释“//ERROR****found****”之后的一行语句存在错误。请改正这些错误,使程序的输出结果为:Con
有如下程序:#include#includeusingnamespacestd;classXCF{inta;public:XCF(intaa=0):a(aa){cout<<”1
有关系R、S和T,如下图所示关系T是由关系R和S通过运算得出,则所使用的操作是
After(enter)______theroom,Ifoundnobodyinit.
最新回复
(
0
)