首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2019-08-27
71
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads — against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U.S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出1896年,在被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有一半涉及铁路,但铁路经常会赢。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qzTO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Socialchangeismorelikelytooccurinsocietieswherethereisamixtureofdifferentkindsofpeoplethaninsocietieswhere
Duringrecentyearswehaveheardmuchabout"race":howthisracedoescertainthingsandthatracebelievescertainthingsand
It’sallannualback-to-schoolroutine.Onemorningyouwavegoodbye,andthat【C1】______eveningyou’reburningthelate-nightoi
I’mverysorrytohave______youwithsomanyquestionsonsuchanoccasion.
【M1】Prosperousalumnihelpedmake2006arecordedfund-raisingyearforcollegesanduniversities,whichhauledin$28billion—a
Allthekeywordsinthearticleareprintedin______typesoastoattractreaders’attention.
Theysuggestedthatanagencybecreatedtocarryouttherecommendationofthecommittee.
随着我国社会经济的迅猛发展、人民生活水平的提高和医疗卫生事业的改善,我国老年人口明显增多。不少人对此忧心忡忡。但有识之士指出,我们不仅要看到人口老龄化所带来的巨大压力,也要看到人口老龄化背后所蕴涵的商机以及老年人丰富的智力、经验等资源,要将压力变为机遇。
Overthepastcentury,allkindsofunfairnessanddiscriminationhavebeencondemnedormadeillegal.Butoneinsidiousformco
Hisideasareinvariablycondemnedas______byhiscolleagues.
随机试题
下列关于运算符函数的描述中,错误的是()。
预防佝偻病发生的措施错误的是
丘脑的非特异性投射系统的主要作用是()
原告长安开发公司起诉被告南方建筑公司,在法院开庭前,关于证据保全的说法错误的有( )。
在我国境内的外国组织的会计记录可以使用中文,也可以使用一种外国文字。()
在当代市场经济条件下,财政政策影响国民经济的运行,成为国家宏观经济政策的支柱。下列选项中,属于国家运用财政政策的是( )。
关于金融市场功能的说法中,错误的是()。
排球中“边跟进”防守阵型:固定由6号位队员跟进防吊球及前区球,或称为“6号位跟进”防守阵型,这种阵型多在对方采取以扣吊结合为主的进攻战术,解决了“心”空的问题,其优点是加强了网前的防守能力。()
IS0 7498-2标准涉及到的5种安全服务是(14)。可信赖计算机系统评价准则(TCSEC)把计算机系统的安全性分为4大类7个等级,其中的C2级是指(15)。
Thephrase"Americandream"generallyreferstothehopesonehasforhisownwell-beinginAmerica.Itisnotnecessarilyasel
最新回复
(
0
)