首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2019-08-27
58
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads — against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U.S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出1896年,在被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有一半涉及铁路,但铁路经常会赢。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qzTO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Speakingtwolanguagesratherthanjustonehasobviouspracticalbenefitsinanincreasinglyglobalizedworld.Butinrecentye
It’sabouttimeparents______thegapsbetweenthemandtheirchildren.
Duringrecentyearswehaveheardmuchabout"race":howthisracedoescertainthingsandthatracebelievescertainthingsand
Traditionalfairytalesarebeingditchedbyparentsbecausetheyaretoo______fortheiryoungchildren,astudyfound.
Ironically,theintellectualtoolscurrentlybeingusedbythepoliticalrighttosuchharmfuleffectoriginatedontheacademic
ThesunheatstheEarth’ssurfaceunevenlycausingdifferencesinairpressure.It’sthesedifferencesthatcausewindtoflowo
Cityofficialsareconsideringbuildingapathtogivethepublic______tothesite.
公共产品和服务需求的快速增长与提供这些产品和服务的缓慢发展是需要引起严重关注的问题之一。
Theshortageofwaterbecamemore______thissummerwiththehighesttemperaturesin40years.(2003年复旦大学考博试题)
Theship’sgeneratorbrokedown,andthepumpshadtobeoperated______insteadofmechanically.(2015年北京航空航天大学考博试题)
随机试题
CPU一次处理的信息长度称为______________。
关于推拿手法的治疗作用下列说法错误的是
A.纯化因子Ⅷ制品B.单采血小板制品C.白细胞制品D.白蛋白制品E.血浆烧伤患者常需大量输用的是
下列叙述正确的是()Ⅰ.建筑顶棚内,可采用护套绝缘线直敷布线Ⅱ.穿金属管的交流线路,应将同一回路的相线和中性线穿于同一根管内Ⅲ.除向电梯供电的电源线路外,其他线路不得沿电梯井道敷设Ⅳ.室内水平直敷布线时,对地
不论是发包人提供的图纸,还是承包人负责设计的图纸经过( )审核签认后才可以使用。
发行股票数量在3亿股以上的,发行人及其主承销商可以在发行方案中采取超额配售选择权。()
孔子曰:“信则人任焉。”这句话与下列《银行业从业人员职业操守》中()原则的要求相似。
下列各项中,属于企业非流动资产项目的有()。
既是课程设计与实施的终点,又是课程设计与实施继续向前发展的起点的是()。
Idon’tunderstand_____heshouldhavedonesomethinglikethat.
最新回复
(
0
)