首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
admin
2015-06-14
37
问题
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these strange creatures? Are they chief executives or labour leaders? Heads of pre-industrial guilds or champions of one of America’s most successful industries? Defenders of civilisation or merciless rack-renters?
Whatever they might be, they are at the heart of a political firestorm. Anger about the cost of college extends from the preppiest of parents to the grungiest of Occupiers. Mr. Obama is trying to channel the anger, to avoid being sideswiped by it. The White House invitation complained that costs have trebled in the past three decades. Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, has urged universities to address costs with "much greater urgency".
A sense of urgency is justified: ex-students have debts approaching $1 trillion. But calm reflection is needed too. America’s universities suffer from many maladies besides cost. And rising costs are often symptoms of much deeper problems: problems that were irritating during the years of affluence but which are cancerous in an age of austerity.
The first problem is the inability to say "no". For decades American universities have been offering more of everything—more courses for undergraduates, more research students for professors and more rock walls for everybody—on the merry assumption that there would always be more money to pay for it all. The second is Ivy League envy. The vast majority of American universities are obsessed by rising up the academic hierarchy, becoming a bit less like Yokel-U and a bit more like Yale.
Ivy League envy leads to an obsession with research. This can be a problem even in the best universities: students feel short-changed by professors fixated on crawling along the frontiers of knowledge with a magnifying glass. At lower-level universities it causes dysfunction. American professors of literature crank out 70,000 scholarly publications a year, compared with 13,757 in 1959. Most of these simply moulder: Mark Bauerlein of Emory University points out that, of the 16 research papers produced in 2004 by the University of Vermont’s literature department, a fairly representative institution, 11 have since received between zero and two citations. The time wasted writing articles that will never be read cannot be spent teaching. In "Academically Adrift" Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa argue that over a third of America’s students show no improvement in critical thinking or analytical reasoning after four years in college.
Popular anger about universities’ costs is rising just as technology is shaking colleges to their foundations. The Internet is changing the rules. Star academics can lecture to millions online rather than the chosen few in person. Testing and marking can be automated. And for-profit companies such as the University of Phoenix are stripping out costs by concentrating on a handful of popular courses as well as making full use of the Internet. The Sloan Foundation reports that online enrolments grew by 10% in 2010, against 2% for the sector as a whole.
Many universities’ first instinct will be to batten down the hatches and wait for this storm to pass. But the storm is not going to pass. The higher-education industry faces a stark choice: either adapt to a rapidly changing world or face a future of cheeseparing. It is surely better to rethink the career structure of your employees than to see it wither(the proportion of professors at four-year universities who are on track to win tenure fell from 50% in 1997 to 39% ten years later). And it is surely better to reform yourself than to have hostile politicians take you into receivership.
A growing number of universities are beginning to recognise this. They understand that the beginning of wisdom in academia, as in business in general, is choosing what not to do. They are in recovery from their Ivy League envy. They are also striking up relations with private-sector organisations. And a growing number of foundations, such as the Kauffman Foundation, are doing their best to spread the gospel of reform and renewal.
As to anger about the cost of college, Mr.Obama’s attitude is most likely to be
选项
A、apparent.
B、prudent.
C、equivocal.
D、aggressive.
答案
B
解析
态度题。由题干中的anger about the cost of college定位至第二段。第三句指出奥巴马对此事的态度(Mr.Obama is trying to channel the anger,to avoid being sideswiped by it.),从中可知奥巴马为了避免引火烧身,在积极疏导人们的愤怒情绪.因此可以推断其态度审慎,故[B]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/r5OO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECTaboutMikeScott?
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
______,writtenin1854byCharlesDickens,isanearnestattackonthevulgarityandmaterialismoftherisingmiddleclassind
Thenatureoflanguageisthenatureofhumanthoughtandhumanaction,forlanguageisnomorenorlessthanthetoolofboth
Manypeoplefeelthathumanbeingsshouldberesponsibleforthedisappearanceofsomeotheranimalspecies.Itistruewemay【M
Ineducation,Nigeriahasamothertonguepolicywhichrequiresthateverychildistaughtinamothertongueatthepreprimary【
Theactthatthespeakerorwriteruseslinguisticformstoenablealistenerorreadertoidentifysomethingiscalled
A、beingcovert.B、shieldingDick.C、beingdishonest.D、attackingthevictim.A
和平共处五项原则中国用以指导自己同各国发展关系的一贯原则,是“互相尊重主权和领土完整、互不侵犯、互不干涉内政、平等互利、和平共处”五项原则。我们的国家有100多年被侵略、被压迫的苦难经历,中国人民决不愿再回到过去的屈辱地位,也决不会把任何其他民族置
随机试题
β2受体
平滑或软组织算法不用于显示
A.黏液血便B.大便的次数和便血程度C.腹痛程度D.腹胀E.肠外表现溃疡性结肠炎活动期的重要表现是
患者低热,午后热甚,胸闷脘痞,不思饮食,渴不欲饮,呕恶,大便稀薄,舌苔黄腻,脉濡数。其证候是
A.三拗汤B.都气丸C.大青龙汤D.麻杏石甘汤合苏葶丸E.小青龙汤合三子养亲汤治疗热性哮喘的首选方剂是
卡介苗预防接种,进针角度为
脑灌注压是指
下列各项中,关于交易性金融资产表述不正确的是()。(2012年改编)
Hedidn’tfeellike______,sohetookataxi.
MostscholarsagreethatIsaacNewton,whileformulatingthelawsofforceandgravityandinventingthecalculusinthelate16
最新回复
(
0
)