首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
admin
2015-08-29
68
问题
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic recovery it is easy to vow that next time lenders’ losses will be pushed onto their creditors, not onto taxpayers.
But cast your mind back to late 2008. Then, the share prices of the world’s biggest banks could halve in minutes. Reasonable people thought that many firms were hiding severe losses. Anyone exposed to them, from speculators to churchgoing custodians of widows’ pensions, tried to yank their cash out, causing a run that threatened another Great Depression. Now, imagine being sat not in the observer’s armchair but in the regulator’s hot seat and faced with such a crisis again. Can anyone honestly say that they would let a big bank go down?
And yet, somehow, that choice is what the people redesigning the rules of finance must try to make possible. The final rules are due in November and will probably call for banks in normal times to carry core capital of at least 10% of risk-adjusted assets. This would be enough to absorb the losses most banks made during 2007-2009 with a decent margin for error.
But that still leaves the outlier banks that in the last crisis, as in most others, lost two to three times more than the average firm. Worse, the crisis has shown that if they are not rescued they can topple the entire system. That is why swaggering talk of letting them burn next time is empty. Instead, a way needs to be found to impose losses on their creditors without causing a wider panic the financial equivalent of squaring a circle.
America has created a resolution authority that will take over failing banks and force losses on unsecured creditors if necessary. That is a decent start, but may be too indiscriminate. The biggest banks each have hundreds of billions of dollars of such debt, including overnight loans from other banks, short-term paper sold to money-market funds and bonds held by pension funds. Such counterparties are likely to run from any bank facing a risk of being put in resolution which, as the recent crisis showed, could mean most banks. Indeed, the unsecured Adebt market is so important that far from destabilising it, regulators might feel obliged to underwrite it, as in 2008.
A better alternative is to give regulators draconian power but over a smaller part of banks’ balance-sheets, so that the panic is contained. The idea is practical since it means amending banks’ debt structures, not reinventing them, although banks would need roughly to double the amount of this debt that they hold. It also avoids too-clever-by-half trigger mechanisms and the opposite pitfall of a laborious legal process. Indeed, it is conceivable that a bank could be recapitalised over a weekend.
The banks worry there are no natural buyers for such securities, making them expensive to issue. In fact they resemble a bog-standard insurance arrangement in which a premium is received and there is a small chance of perhaps one in 50 each year of severe losses. Regulators would, though, have to ensure that banks didn’t buy each other’s securities and that they didn’t all end up in the hands of one investor. Last time round American International Group became the dumping ground for Wall Street’s risk and had to be bailed out too.
Would it work? The one thing certain about the next crisis is that it will feature the same crushing panic, pleas from banks and huge political pressure to stabilise the system, whatever the cost. The hope is that regulators might have a means to impose losses on the private sector in a controlled way, and not just face a binary choice between bail-out or oblivion.
The solution suggested in Paragraph 6 is better in the following ways EXCEPT
选项
A、making less effort on banks’ debt structures.
B、not having to face stupid trigger mechanism.
C、going through no troublesome legal process.
D、helping the banks collect enough capital.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rZOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Ican’tpreserveanydifferencebetweenthesetwopictures.
AudienceofWritingAudienceisaveryimportantconceptforwriting.Youneedtoanalyzeyouraudienceintermsofthefollowin
AllofthefollowingstatementsabouterroranalysisaretrueEXCEPTthat______.
ClaremontMcKennaCollege,asmall,prestigiousCaliforniaschool,admittedthatithassubmittedfalseSATscorestopublicati
Thebizarreanticsofsleepwalkershavepuzzledpolice,perplexedscientists,andfascinatedwritersforcenturies.Thereisan
夜是静寂的,柔和的。从对面我听呸见一点声音。香港似乎闭了它的大口。介是当我注意到那一座光芒万丈的星的山的时候,我又仿佛听见那许多灯光的私语了。因为船的移动。灯光也似乎移动起来。而且电车汽车上的灯也在飞跑。我看见它们时明时暗,就像人在眨眼。或者像它们在追逐,
ThelongeststatevisitthatHuJintaohasmadetoasinglecountrywilllast
Completethegap-fillingtask.SomeofthegapsbelowmayrequireamaximumofTHREEwords.Make.suretheword(s)youfill.in
ThelongestriverinCanadais
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
随机试题
当一国调整商品的进出口关税时,就会影响到类似于天然橡胶、铜、铝等商品的正常跨市套利行为,这属于套利交易的()。
香港人既有中国的传统观念,又有西方的习俗,他们忌讳()
在社会主义教育过程中,必须使受教育者认识到哪些?
西周时期,将惯犯和偶犯区分为()。
下列项目中,可通过“周转材料”科目核算的有( )。
注册会计师通过实施分析程序,发现X公司20×7年销售费用中的运费占营业收入的比例与上年相比存在不合理下降。根据这一信息,最应当怀疑X公司()认定存在重大错报。
座、架、盒既然是古玩的__________,其设计、工艺、大小、高矮、色泽等都要充分__________到所配器物的本色与造型,突出古玩本身,将器物自身的意境与妙趣最大限度地显现、衬托出来,并且尽可能使两者和谐统一,而不可过于繁缛,以致__________
科学家最近成功破译白鳍豚全基因组图谱。科学家的努力当然是可贵的,30多年前中国科学家就开始了对白鳍豚的研究,其成果当然不止一张“全基因组图谱”。但其对于保护这些可怜的物种究竟起到了多大的作用,恐怕还不敢断言,而且我们更多的是从白鳍豚身上找到可以“利用”的特
《唐律疏议》
SoearlynextmorningwewereofftoBeijing______the8!30train.
最新回复
(
0
)