首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
admin
2015-08-29
99
问题
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked incoming students to sign a commitment to act with respect, integrity, and kindness in order to "promote understanding." Libertarian commentator Virginia Postrel, wrote that "treating ’kindness’ as the way to civil discourse doesn’t show students how to argue with accuracy and respect. " Harry R. Lewis, a former dean of Harvard College and someone with an excellent perspective on undergraduate education, warned that it impinged on freedom of thought and that "a student would be breaking the pledge if she woke up one morning and decided it was more important to achieve intellectually than to be kind."
Has empathy become the new scapegoat in the long-standing concern about academic attainment in American schools? Books like Academically Adrift chart the decline in academic rigor on American college campuses, citing the plummeting hours that students spend on studying and critical thinking skills. But there’s also been a troubling, and concurrent decrease in empathy over the past thirty years. A study of 14,000 college students published in Personality and Social Psychology Review in 2011 showed that the majority of college students today are less empathetic than their predecessors of prior decades. And other research even shows that education(like medical school!)can actually wring the empathy out of students.
Many people are squeamish about calls to increase empathy in young people because they wrongly assume that the ability to empathize is incompatible with traits like logic, reason, and impartiality. We’ve now entered a debate about how nice we should be or, rather, how nice we can afford to be and still stay competitive as a society, clinging to the pernicious belief that anything beneficial to young people must be painful and that we are in a rat race that is a zero-sum game.
In fact, there need be no tradeoff, at Harvard or anywhere else, between intellectual rigor and kindness. This is a false dichotomy, like the belief that a sick person must choose between a competent doctor and a humane one. Indeed, empathetic behavior listening well, for example actually makes a doctor better able to diagnose and treat illness, and studies show that when doctors are empathetic, their patients need less medication to relieve pain and less time to heal wounds.
People often equate empathy with gentleness and passivity. But empathy is really just a cognitive walk in another person’s shoes. An empathetic person is, fundamentally, a curious and imaginative person. Empathy involves a search for understanding. And we need today’s students to understand the world better in order to respond to its seemingly intractable problems.
Many educators agree that the intellectual skills required for the 21st century depend on not only a mastery of facts and figures, but also on complex communication, flexibility, collaboration, adaptability, and innovation. We live in a more open society than ever, with greater mixing of people and ideas.
The ability to master a new language, to translate scientific findings into policy, or to weave the concerns of one field into the terms of another(the way a Macintosh computer melds engineering and design), requires students to step outside of their own life experience and habits of mind. Steve Jobs had empathy for his customers.
Of course, we can always find examples of world-class thinkers who are oblivious to people’s feelings. But that doesn’t negate the fact that the vast majority of students will need to assume the perspective of others in order to get ahead in life. We can call this empathy. Or we can call it 21st century learning. It’s both. Empathy doesn’t always lead to more moral behavior, but it can lead to more intelligent behavior.
The author wants to argue in the passage
选项
A、that being kind and being smart are not mutually exclusive.
B、whether Harvard’s "freshman pledge" should be adopted or not.
C、that empathy has become the new scapegoat of academic decline.
D、when the debate over Harvard’s "freshman pledge" will be ended.
答案
A
解析
主旨题。本文开篇提到引发作者讨论的“新生承诺”事件。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rpOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisNOTwrittenbyKateChopin?
AmericanLiteratureAliteratureistherecordofhumanexperienceandpeoplehavealwaysbeenimpelledtowritedowntheirimpr
AmericanLiteratureAliteratureistherecordofhumanexperienceandpeoplehavealwaysbeenimpelledtowritedowntheirimpr
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECT?
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsⅠ.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteager
A、Thepolicesaidtheystillcouldn’tisolatethecasualtiesformeachsite.B、Thetankerwasn’tsearchedbypolice.C、Thetanke
Inrecentyears,inordertohelpchildrenfromcountrysidetofulfilltheircollegedreams,severalroundsof"ProjectofReali
ClaremontMcKennaCollege,asmall,prestigiousCaliforniaschool,admittedthatithassubmittedfalseSATscorestopublicati
ThemetropolitanpoliceforceofLondonisunderthedirectcontrolof______.
随机试题
"Trend-benders"(反潮族)arepeoplewhotrytobringoldstylesbacktolife,andtheyencouragepeopletomakesomechangesintheir
A.肾小球新月体形成B.部分肾小球节段性硬化C.大部分肾小球纤维化,小部分肾小球代偿肥大D.肾小球毛细血管壁弥漫性增厚局灶性节段性肾小球硬化
请简要陈述秦朝的诉讼形式。
土地管理的基础是()。A.地价管理B.地籍管理C.土地执法监察D.土地用途管制
我国为鼓励中小企业投资,对凡符合国家产业政策的技术改造项目的国产设备投资,按()的比例抵免企业所得税。
根据《机关、团体、企业、事业单位消防安全管理规定》(公安部令第61号)的规定,消防安全重点单位对每名员工应当至少每()进行一次消防安全培训。
甲公司在A、B、C三地拥有三家分公司,这三家分公司的经营活动由一个总部负责运作。由于A、B、C三家分公司均能产生独立于其他分公司的现金流入,所以该公司将这三家分公司确定为三个资产组。2016年12月31日,公司经营所处的技术环境发生了重大不利变化,出现减值
关于售后回购,下列说法中正确的有()。
关于我国的出土文物,下列说法正确的是()。
A、Certainthingscannotbelearnedfrombooks.B、Foreignstudentshadbetterliveoncampus.C、Choiceofwheretolivevariesfr
最新回复
(
0
)