首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se as
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se as
admin
2013-01-28
50
问题
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se assigned each diarist a set of codes to indicate employment, marital status, number of children, and size of the town in which he or she lived. To analyze the number, location and gender mix of visiting occasions, we coded each day in January and July for every year of the diary, counting the number of named visitors, the visitors’ gender, the size of the visiting occasion (1 to 4 people, or 5 and above), the gender mix of those present during the visit, and the location of the visit. While this may seem straightforward at first glance, the variable nature of the diary entries meant that the coding process was not as uncomplicated as we initially anticipated.
Given the number of diarists and the span of diary-keeping years, we faced the possibility of coding over 200,000 diary days. Because of the labor-intensive nature of the coding and the number of entries, we chose to code only 2 months—January and July—of each year a diarist kept a diary. We chose 2 months that could reflect a range of sociability. Severe January weather in New England impeded mobility, but it also freed those who were farmers from most of their labor-intensive chores. July tended to be haying season tbr farmers, which meant some people routinely worked all month in the fields—some alone, some with hired help. Further, the clement July weather meant grater mobility for all of the diary keepers. For some people—those who kept a diary for only a single year—the fact that we coded only 2 months out of each year meant we have only 62 "diary-days" to document their social lives. For others, we have several thousand. Limiting ourselves to January and July for each diary year, we nonetheless coded entries for a total of 24,752 diary days. In an effort to capture an accurate picture of visiting patterns, we coded every day of a given month, even those that had no entry or that mentioned only the weather, as well as those that recorded numerous visiting occasions in one day.
Determining a working definition of what constituted a visit was also an unexpected challenge. For example, although schoolteacher Mary Mudge kept a meticulous record of her visiting "rounds," listing names, places, and conversation topics, other diarists were not as forthcoming. A typical entry in farmer John Campbell’ s diary (9 July, 1825 ) was less amenable to our initial coding scheme: "Go to Carr’ s for Oxen." ( See Hansen and Mcdonald, 1995, for a fuller discussion of the pitfalls of coding diary data. ) We therefore created the following coding protocol.
We defined a visit as any occasion in which the diarist names the presence of individuals not of his or her household, the presence of the non-household member serving to distinguish between a community interaction and a household interaction. We also coded as visits public events at which the diarist was present but others in attendance were not named. The most common among these were records of church attendance. Although an entry "went to church" did not result in a finding of specific male or female visitors, it was a community interaction; thus, these entries were coded as gender-mixed visiting occasions of five or more people in a public place. Because of the variable nature of diary-keeping practices, we were careful to record only what we could confidently infer. Therefore, some entries record visits but no named individuals. Others, such as church attendance (which is generally a large-group event) or a visit to one named friend ( which is an intimate affair), allowed us to code the size of the group. Still others, when the location of the visit was specifically mentioned, allowed us to code the diarist as hosting, acting as a guest in another’ s home, or interaction at a public place.
What is the significance of Hansen’ s study to the passage?
选项
A、It was the foundation of the research.
B、It was the groundwork for the research.
C、It was the research that was coded.
D、It was the example used for the coding.
答案
A
解析
根据第一句Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s qualitative study,可见Hansen’s study为研究提供了基础。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ru1O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Fastfood,amainstayofAmericaneatingfordecades,mayhavereachedaplateauintheUnitedStatesasthematuringbaby-boom
Manypeopleseemtothinkthatsciencefictionistypifiedbythecoversofsomeoftheoldpulpmagazines:theBug-EyedMonster
Manypeopleseemtothinkthatsciencefictionistypifiedbythecoversofsomeoftheoldpulpmagazines:theBug-EyedMonster
Areyoualwayssureyouknowwhatpeoplemeanwhentheytrytodescribetheirfeelingstoyou?Weusebothwordsandgesturesto
Eighttimeswithinthepastmillionyears,somethingintheEarth’sclimaticequationhaschanged,allowingsnowinthemountain
Eighttimeswithinthepastmillionyears,somethingintheEarth’sclimaticequationhaschanged,allowingsnowinthemountain
Intelligentreadersknowatoncehow______weare,andhowskeptical,howfirmforothersandhowdiffidentaboutourselves.
"Popularan"hasanumberofmeanings,impossibletodefinewithanyprecision,whichrangefromfolkloretojunk.Thepolesare
Malnutritionandtheresultingimpairedgrowthanddevelopmentinchildrenofweaningageindevelopingcountriesresultsnoton
随机试题
建设工程合同+商品房买卖+不动产物权变动+代理(本题有超纲内容,供考生参考)房产开发商甲与建筑施工企业乙签订建筑工程施工合同。合同约定:建筑工程完成时,甲与乙按6:4比例分配房屋。房屋建成后,甲以工程逾期完工构成违约为由起诉乙,要求乙支付违约金300万元;
《资治通鉴》的史书体裁是()。
不属于非特异性感染病原体的是
关于正偏态分布资料的描述,说法错误的是
平面滑动时,滑动面的倾角β与滑动面的摩擦角φ的关系为:
对于复合层涂层防腐蚀施工.涂底漆前应对()等特殊部位加以保护。
通过“招、拍、挂”程序承受土地使用权的应按()计征契税。
本题为选做题,请在Ⅰ、Ⅱ两道试题中选取其中一道作答,若两题都回答,只按第Ⅰ道试题的成绩记入总分。选做题Ⅰ:阅读材料:材料1在去年美国攻打伊拉克引发国际社会严重分歧以来,法国积极拉拢北京,有更深一层的战略意义。事实上,中、法关系一开始就建
编写如下程序:PrivateSubCommand1_Click() DimiAsInteger,jAsInteger n=InputBox("输入一个大于1的正整数") Fori=2Ton Forj=2To
软件设计中划分模块的一个准则是()。
最新回复
(
0
)