首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Do music lessons really make children smarter? A) A recent analysis found that most research mischaracterizes the relationsh
Do music lessons really make children smarter? A) A recent analysis found that most research mischaracterizes the relationsh
admin
2022-03-24
124
问题
Do music lessons really make children smarter?
A) A recent analysis found that most research mischaracterizes the relationship between music and skills enhancement.
B) In 2004, a paper appeared in the journal Psychological Science, titled "Music Lessons Enhance IQ." The author, composer and psychologist Glenn Schellenberg, had conducted an experiment with 144 children randomly assigned to four groups: one learned the keyboard for a year, one took singing lessons, one joined an acting class, and a control group had no extracurricular training. The IQ of the children in the two musical groups rose by an average of seven points in the course of a year; those in the other two groups gained an average of 4.3 points.
C) Schellenberg had long been skeptical of the science supporting claims that music education enhances children’s abstract reasoning, math, or language skills. If children who play the piano are smarter, he says, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are smarter because they play the piano. It could be that the youngsters who play the piano also happen to be more ambitious or better at focusing on a task. Correlation, after all, does not prove causation.
D) The 2004 paper was specifically designed to address those concerns. And as a passionate musician, Schellenberg was delighted when he turned up credible evidence that music has transfer effects on general intelligence. But nearly a decade later, in 2013, the Education Endowment Foundation funded a bigger study with more than 900 students. That study failed to confirm Schellenberg’s findings, producing no evidence that music lessons improved math and literacy skills.
E) Schellenberg took that news in stride while continuing to cast a skeptical eye on the research in his field. Recently, he decided to formally investigate just how often his fellow researchers in psychology and neuroscience make what he believes are erroneous—or at least premature—causal connections between music and intelligence. His results, published in May, suggest that many of his peers do just that.
F) For his recent study, Schellenberg asked two research assistants to look for correlational studies on the effects of music education. They found a total of 114 papers published since 2000. To assess whether the authors claimed any causation, researchers then looked for telltale verbs in each paper’s title and abstract, verbs like "enhance," "promote," "facilitate," and "strengthen." The papers were categorized as neuroscience if the study employed a brain imaging method like magnetic resonance, or if the study appeared in a journal that had "brain," "neuroscience," or a related term in its title. Otherwise the papers were categorized as psychology. Schellenberg didn’t tell his assistants what exactly he was trying to prove.
G) After computing their assessments, Schellenberg concluded that the majority of the articles erroneously claimed that music training had a causal effect. The overselling, he also found, was more prevalent among neuroscience studies, three quarters of which mischaracterized a mere association between music training and skills enhancement as a cause-and-effect relationship. This may come as a surprise to some. Psychologists have been battling charges that they don’t do "real" science for some time—in large part because many findings from classic experiments have proved unreproducible. Neuroscientists, on the other hand, armed with brain scans and EEGs (脑电图), have not been subject to the same degree of critique.
H) To argue for a cause-and-effect relationship, scientists must attempt to explain why and how a connection could occur. When it comes to transfer effects of music, scientists frequently point to brain plasticity—the fact that the brain changes according to how we use it. When a child learns to play the violin, for example, several studies have shown that the brain region responsible for the fine motor skills of the left hand’s fingers is likely to grow. And many experiments have shown that musical training improves certain hearing capabilities, like filtering voices from background noise or distinguishing the difference between the consonants (辅音) ’b’ and ’g’.
I) But Schellenberg remains highly critical of how the concept of plasticity has been applied in his field. "Plasticity has become an industry of its own," he wrote in his May paper. Practice does change the brain, he allows, but what is questionable is the assertion that these changes affect other brain regions, such as those responsible for spatial reasoning or math problems.
J) Neuropsychologist Lutz Jancke agrees. "Most of these studies don’t allow for causal inferences," he said. For over two decades, Jancke has researched the effects of music lessons, and like Schellenberg, he believes that the only way to truly understand their effects is to run longitudinal studies. In such studies, researchers would need to follow groups of children with and without music lessons over a long period of time—even if the assignments are not completely random. Then they could compare outcomes for each group.
K) Some researchers are starting to do just that. The neuroscientist Peter Schneider from Heidelberg University in Germany, for example, has been following a group of children for ten years now. Some of them were handed musical instruments and given lessons through a school-based program in the Ruhr region of Germany called Jedem Kind ein Instrument, or "an instrument for every child," which was carried out with government funding. Among these children, Schneider has found that those who were enthusiastic about music and who practiced voluntarily showed improvements in hearing ability, as well as in more general competencies, such as the ability to concentrate.
L) To establish whether effects such as improved concentration are caused by music participation itself, and not by investing time in an extracurricular activity of any kind, Assal Habibi, a psychology professor at the University of Southern California, is conducting a five-year longitudinal study with children from low-income communities in Los Angeles. The youngsters fall into three groups: those who take after-school music, those who do after-school sports, and those with no structured after-school program at all. After two years, Habibi and her colleagues reported seeing structural changes in the brains of the musically trained children, both locally and in the pathways connecting different parts of the brain.
M)That may seem compelling, but Habibi’s children were not selected randomly. Did the children who were drawn to music perhaps have something in them from the start that made them different but eluded the brain scanners? "As somebody who started taking piano lessons at the age of five and got up every morning at seven to practice, that experience changed me and made me part of who I am today," Schellenberg said. "The question is whether those kinds of experiences do so systematically across individuals and create exactly the same changes. And I think that is that huge leap of faith."
N) Did he have a hidden talent that others didn’t have? Or more endurance than his peers? Music researchers tend, like Schellenberg, to be musicians themselves, and as he noted in his recent paper, "the idea of positive cognitive and neural side effects from music training (and other pleasurable activities) is inherently appealing." He also admits that if he had children of his own, he would encourage them to take music lessons and go to university. "I would think that it makes them better people, more critical, just wiser in general," he said.
O) But those convictions should be checked at the entrance to the lab, he added. Otherwise, the work becomes religion or faith. "You have to let go of your faith if you want to be a scientist."
One researcher shares Glenn Schellenberg’s view that it is necessary to conduct long-term developmental studies to understand the effects of music training.
选项
答案
J
解析
注意抓住题干中的关键信息conduct long-term developmental studies。原文中首次提到要进行长期研究的内容是在J段。该段第三句提到,詹克和舍伦贝格一样认为,要真正理解音乐课的影响,唯一的方法就是进行纵向研究。紧接着下一句解释了什么是纵向研究:在纵向研究中,研究人员需要对上音乐课和没上音乐课的儿童群体进行长时间的跟踪研究。也就是说,詹克同意舍伦贝格的观点,认为有必要进行长期发展性研究来了解音乐训练的影响。题干中的One researcher shares Glenn Schellenberg’s view对应原文中的like Schellenberg,he believes;it is necessary to对应the only way to;conduct long—term developmental studies对应run longitudinal studies。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ryx7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
ItstartedwithanitchafterastrollonaCaribbeanbeach,butinjustafewdaysithaddevelopedintoacompletetravel【C1】_
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessaytoexpressyourviewsonthephenomenonofexcessivespendinga
Waffles?Frenchtoast?Bacon?Bigbreakfastsmaybeathingofthepast.AccordingtotheAssociatedPress,moreAmericansarec
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessaytoexpressyourviewsonthephenomenonthatmanypeoplerega
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledRelationshipBetweenOne’sMajorandFutureJob.You
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledAdversityOftenLeadstoProsperitybycommentingon
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortwelcomespeech.Youshouldwriteatleast150wordsbutnomorethan
A、Doubtful.B、Supportive.C、Indifferent.D、Objective.A
A、Helaughedatthepolice.B、Helookedforwardtogoingtoprison.C、Hetookhisbottleswithhim.D、Hewentwiththepolicewi
WhatdoweknowaboutIcebergWaterfromthepassage?Bysaying"Mydogcouldtellthedifferencebetweenbottledandtapwater
随机试题
理想液体在无分支管路中恒定流动时,管径细的地方流量大,管径粗的地方流量小。()
TheOlympicGamesTheOlympicGamesareaninternationalsportscompetition,whichareheldeveryfouryearsinadifferent
非极性浸出溶剂的浸出液
根据法律规定,权利人或利害关系人有证据证明他人正在实施或者即将实施侵犯其权利的行为,可以在起诉前向法院申请采取责令停止有关行为和财产保全的措施。下列哪些行为可以申请采取该措施?()
在我国,除()外,其他法院均受理经济纠纷案件。
甲公司与乙公司签订一份买卖合同。合同约定:若发生合同纠纷,须交A市仲裁委员会仲裁。后因乙公司违约,甲公司依法解除合同,并要求乙公司赔偿损失。双方对赔偿数额发生争议,甲公司就该争议向A市仲裁委员会申请仲裁。乙公司认为,因合同被解除,合同中的仲裁条款已失效,故
将个人所得税的纳税义务人区分为居民纳税义务人和非居民纳税义务人,依据的标准有()。
案例小刘学习比较认真,但学习的效果不理想。在一次应用题的解答过程中,老师发现小刘对题目无从入手,情绪很是急躁。“小刘,我知道你能解这道题的。”老师在小刘耳边低语,“你先好好花上几分钟仔细阅读题目。看能不能把题目分解成几部分,等一下我再过来看你做得怎么样
社会主义法治理念内涵中的根本保证是()。
根据所给材料。回答下列问题。某单位在大年初一、初二、初三安排6个人值班,他们是G、H、K、L、P、S,每天需要2人值班。人员安排要满足以下条件:(1)L与P必须在同一天值班。(2)G与H不能在同一天值班。(3)如果K在初一值班,那么G在初二值班。
最新回复
(
0
)