首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The extraordinary rise of living alone is the biggest social change that we’ve neglected to identify, let alone examine. Con
The extraordinary rise of living alone is the biggest social change that we’ve neglected to identify, let alone examine. Con
admin
2022-02-03
51
问题
The extraordinary rise of living alone is the biggest social change that we’ve neglected to identify, let alone examine.
Consider that in 1950, a mere 4 million Americans lived alone, making up only 9% of households. Back then, living alone was most common in the Western states that attracted seasonal workingmen, and it was usually a short-lived stage on the road to a more conventional domestic life.
Not anymore. According to the latest data, nearly 33 million Americans live alone, making up 28% of households, which means they are now tied with childless couples as the most important type, more common than the nuclear family, the multi generational family and the roommate or group home. These aren’t just temporary living situations: over a five-year period, people who live alone are more likely to remain in their current state than anyone else except married couples with children. They’re concentrated in big cities throughout the country.
Living alone, being alone and feeling lonely are hardly the same, yet in recent years experts have mixed them up, raising fears that the rise of living alone signals the ultimate atomization of the modern world. In fact, there’s little evidence that the rise of living alone is making more Americans lonely. According to the latest studies, what matters is not whether we live alone but whether we feel alone. Divorced people often say there’s nothing lonelier than living with the wrong person. Besides, people living alone compensate by becoming more socially active than those who live with others.
The truth is, today nearly everyone who lives alone chooses to do so, despite less expensive options from finding roommates to living with family.
After all, living alone allows us to do what we want, when we want, on our own terms. It liberates us from the restrictions of domestic partner’s needs and demands. Today, in our age of digital media and ever expanding social networks, living alone can offer even greater benefits: the time and space for the healing power of aloneness.
This means that living alone can help us discover who we are and what gives us meaning and purpose. It might be exactly what we need to reconnect.
It is indicated that living alone________.
选项
A、makes more demands on society
B、imposes on one more restrictions
C、presents one with more challenges
D、costs more than living with family
答案
D
解析
细节题。文章第五段提到,尽管从寻找室友到与家人同住的花费较小,但如今几乎每个独自生活的人都选择这样做。也就是说独居的花费比与家人同住的花费多。故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sFNd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
AspeciallabattheUniversityofChicagoisbusyonly【C1】______Itisadream【C2】______whereresearchersareatwork【C3】______d
AspeciallabattheUniversityofChicagoisbusyonly【C1】______Itisadream【C2】______whereresearchersareatwork【C3】______d
Ifyouwanttostayyoung,sitdownandhaveagoodthink.ThisistheresearchfindingofateamofJapanesedoctors,whosayt
Fromchildhoodtooldage,wealluselanguageasameansofbroadeningourknowledgeofourselvesandtheworldaboutus.When
Whenwethinkabouthappiness,weusuallythinkofsomethingextraordinary,apeakofgreatdelight--andthosepeaksseemtoget
Researchershaveestablishedthatwhenpeoplearementallyengaged,biochemicalchangesoccurinthebrainthatallowittoact
Writealetterinanswertotheadvertisement.OfficeAssistant,withexperienceinbookkeepingandtyping,wantedforposi
Wehaveheardalotaboutthehealthbenefitsoftea,especiallygreentea.Itishighinpolyphenols,compoundswithstrongan
Whatisthenewbenefitofgreentea?
Whatisthenewbenefitofgreentea?
随机试题
A、2~10℃B、10~30℃C、<20℃D、遮光、<20℃E、巴曲酶冷处贮存应()。
关于职业禁止,下列哪一选项是正确的?()(2016/2/9)
资本是投资者为开展生产经营活动而投入的资金。会计上的资本指的是投资者投入的资本,包括所有者投入的资本和债权人投人的资本。()
纳税人将其开采的矿产品原矿自用于连续生产精矿产品,无法提供移送使用原矿数量的,可将其精矿按折算率折算成原矿数量,以此作为销售数量。()
从业人员践行职业道德规范——“奉献”的要求不包括()。
从所给四个选项中.选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
在某些国人眼里,诺贝尔文学奖似乎成了政治奖。2006年年底,某师范大学中文系一位吴姓教授,在杂志上发表文章《诺贝尔文学奖的中国迷局》,所言颇有代表性。文中铁口独断:“在可预见的将来,中国不会出现诺贝尔文学奖的获奖作家。……我对中国作家写出诺奖认为的‘政治正
x是实数.则x的取值范围是(0,1).(1)x<.(2)2x>x2.
法和其他社会规范都具有()
1原式
最新回复
(
0
)