首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2022-06-18
61
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
The word "backfire" underlined in Paragraph 6 means to _____.
选项
A、go wrong
B、feed back
C、set fire
D、lift up
答案
A
解析
backfire意为“回火,适得其反”,故A“出现问题,出错”与之最接近。由前文第5段倒数第二句看,一些学生看到与死亡有关的吸烟警告,反而吸烟的态度更积极,也即吸烟警告会适得其反,由此也可以推断出backfire的意思。B“反馈”、C“点燃”和D“举起”,意思都与backfire差别较大。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sHuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
1ThenumberofinsectspeciesonEarthexceedsthatofallotherlifeformscombined.Entomologistsestimatethattherearewel
EarthisAdividedtoseveralclimaticBzonesthatCarebasedonaverageDannualtemperatureandrainfall.
Lookatthefoursquares,A,B,C,andD,whichindicatewherethefollowingsentencecouldbeaddedtothepassagebelow.Where
_____commonusageamongeconomists,theterm"naturalrate"ismisleading.
Bayberries,smallAtreesorshrubswithleatheryleaves,BtheyhaveberriesthatproduceaCwaxusedinmakingDcandles.
Somepeopleprefertoworkforthemselvesorownabusiness.Othersprefertoworkforanemployer.Wouldyouratherbeself-emp
Whatisthelecturemainlyabout?Accordingtotheprofessor,howdidRauschenberg’swhitepaintingsinfluenceJohnCage?
Whydoesthestudentgotoseethedirector?Choose2answers.Accordingtothedirector,whatisthepolicyconcerningmealpl
Whatisthelecturemainlyabout?Whatdoestheprofessorimplyaboutamemorythathaspassedthroughthelong-termretention
MEXICANMURALART(1)ThefirstmajormodernartmovementinLatinAmericawasMexicanmuralism,whichfeaturedlarge-scale
随机试题
简述偏差行为的功能。
56岁无牙颌患者,义齿戴用7年,自觉咀嚼不利,面显苍老。其原因是
根据《环境影响评价技术导则非污染生态影响》(HJ/T19—1997),以下说法不正确的是()。
何先生的信用卡账单日是每月10日,到期还款日是每月30日。3月10日银行的对账单显示何先生3月5日有一笔2000元的消费,如果何先生3月30日前偿还银行200元,则何先生4月10日账单显示的循环利息为()元。
截至2017年5月,我国已有()处地质公园被纳入世界地质公园网络名录。
()是向全社会普及安全知识的一个重要环节,是复杂的社会治安形势的需要。
阅读材料,回答下列问题。2016年“一带一路”沿线64个国家GDP之和约为12.0万亿美元,占全球GDP的16.0%;人口总数约为32.1亿人,占全球人口的43.4%;另外贸易总额约为71885.5亿美元,占全球贸易总
简述资本主义法律的特征。
CriticsmaintainthatthefictionofHermanMelville(1819-1891)haslimitations,suchasitslackofinventiveplotsafterMoby
DearSir,MickeyMouseisoneoftheleadingcompaniesintoyretailinglocatedintheUK.Wehaveoutletsthroughoutthewh
最新回复
(
0
)