首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2022-06-18
55
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
The word "backfire" underlined in Paragraph 6 means to _____.
选项
A、go wrong
B、feed back
C、set fire
D、lift up
答案
A
解析
backfire意为“回火,适得其反”,故A“出现问题,出错”与之最接近。由前文第5段倒数第二句看,一些学生看到与死亡有关的吸烟警告,反而吸烟的态度更积极,也即吸烟警告会适得其反,由此也可以推断出backfire的意思。B“反馈”、C“点燃”和D“举起”,意思都与backfire差别较大。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sHuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
1ThenumberofinsectspeciesonEarthexceedsthatofallotherlifeformscombined.Entomologistsestimatethattherearewel
AIncreasingphysicalactivitycanBhelppeoplewithnormalbloodpressureClowertheirriskofDdevelophighbloodpressure.
Tarragonhaslongbeencultivatedforitsleaves,______forflavoringvinegar,sauces,andsoups.
Inaresearchlaboratory,teamsofworkers______investigateaproblem.
EveryorganizationthatproducesAgoodsorservicesneedsawideBvarietyofpeopleCmanagingtheoperationandtohandlethecl
Howdoestheprofessordevelopthetopicoftheviolinfamily?Choosetwoanswers.
Whydoesthestudenttalktohisadviser?
Somepeopleprefertoworkforthemselvesorownabusiness.Othersprefertoworkforanemployer.Wouldyouratherbeself-emp
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Itisbettertouseyourownknowledgeandexperiencetosolveproblemsr
IfwelookattheChineseandBritishconceptsofhospitality,wefindonemajorsimilaritybutanumberofimportantdifference
随机试题
A、 B、 C、 C题干问的是如何低价购买到这台打印机的。A选项是回答地点的。B选项不能用来回答特殊疑问句。故选C。
我国社会主义教育目的的理论基础是()。
Bodylanguageisaneasierwayofexpressingfeelingsthanspoken【C1】______.Forexample,youdonotsaytosomeoneeasilythat
男,45岁,转移性右下腹痛12小时。查体:体温37℃,右下腹压痛,无肌紧张及反跳痛,结肠充气试验阳性,血白细胞9×109/L,诊断为急性阑尾炎,恰当的处理是
根据《医疗事故处理条例》的规定,以下关于医疗事故鉴定程序启动的正确说法是
患者,男,34岁,入院前多次用木棍敲楼下邻居的房顶墙。他告诉医生,楼下的邻居能猜到他的思想,并且他认为邻居每次经过他家时都在拿他的这些思想污蔑或议论他,而这些污蔑或议论的话语常在他耳边不断地重复,使他惶惶不可终日。只有一个解决办法,就是让邻居搬走。首先
下列哪些职务不需要必须具有香港特别行政区永久居民和在外国无居留权的条件?()
建设工程实行施工许可制度,主要是为了()。
设有以下函数过程PrivateFunctionFun(a()AsInteger,bAsString)AsIntegerEndFunction若已有变量声明:Dimx(5)AsInteger,nA
Whenyourkidsareadvisedto“getaneducation”iftheywanttoearnadecentincome,theyaretoldonlyhalfofthetruth.Wha
最新回复
(
0
)