首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
admin
2013-10-22
27
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image.-libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read ore, or at least buy more—several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things- records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books — have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. 1 can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught —and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them, 1 should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
What can we learn about the CDs in music business?
选项
A、They will take up much room of their collectors.
B、They will become cheaper because of less popularity.
C、They will be replaced by online music finally.
D、They will no longer appear in cars.
答案
C
解析
同义转述题。作者在本段通过CD的例子证实了电子书的发展过程,where引导的非限制性定语从句表明网上下载已经逐渐并一定会取代CD;第三句进一步证实了这一趋势——占据墙上空间的CD都没有了。由此可知,C)“它们最终将被网上音乐所取代”是对第一句的同义转述,故为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sKc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Therainstoppedsoon.B、Ithasbeenrainingaday.C、Itisabouttorain.D、Therainsareveryheavy.C语义推断题。男士看见天上的云正聚集,后悔没带
OneofAmerica’smostimportant【B1】______ishermodernmusic.Americanpopularmusicisplayedallovertheworld.Itisenjoye
Thetelevision______betweenthetwocandidateswillbeheldonSunday.
WhiteHouse,official【S1】______ofthepresidentoftheU.S.,builtinitsoriginalformbetween1792and1800,and【S2】______inW
Theheatingsystem,whichadoptsthenewesttechnique,hasan______temperaturecontrol.
A、Degreesineconomics.B、Addedeffort.C、Medicalschools.D、Lawschools.A综合推断题。短文中提到,经济学学位非常受欢迎,因为它能让毕业生获得高薪且不需像医学院或法学院的学生那样付出
WhenMITputtheircoursecontentonlinein2002,theywereexpectingtheirsitetobeoneofthemostpopularsitesaroundthe
A、Thenumberofnewspaperreadersissteadilyincreasing.B、Therearemomnonreadersamongyoungpeoplenowadays.C、Themaremor
A、Atamusicstore.B、Atthepostoffice.C、InaGermanclass.D、OntheInternet.D这是一个有关寻求和提供建议的谈话,谈话中的男士通过网络认识了一位德国女友,并应邀去德国赴
Althoughthestigma(耻辱)onceassociatedwithmentalillnesshasgraduallygoneawayinrecentyears,mostoftheAmericanswhoha
随机试题
OneafternoonIwassittingatmyfavoritetableinarestaurant,waitingforthefoodIhadordered.SuddenlyI【C1】________that
患者张某,男性,70岁。症见心胸憋闷疼痛,心悸气短,畏寒自汗,四肢欠温,伴有双下肢水肿,喘促,舌质淡胖,边有齿痕,苔白腻,脉沉细或沉迟。其治疗应首选的方剂是
医学伦理学的研究内容不包括下列哪项
根据刑事诉讼法的规定,下列关于审判监督程序的说法正确的是:
下列关于税收规范性文件的表述,正确的有()。
旅行社对保险公司请求赔偿,自其知道保险事故发生之日起1年内不行使而消灭。()
下列()不属于采购成本。
11月8日上午,国防科技工业局首次公布了嫦娥二号卫星传回的嫦娥三号预选着陆区——月球洪湾地区的局部影像图,它是一张黑白照片,成像时间为10月28日18时,是卫星在距离月面18.7公里地方拍摄的,摄像图的传回,标志着嫦娥二号任务所确定的六个工作目标已经全部完
设f(x)为[一a,a]上的连续偶函数,且f(x)>0,令F(x)=∫-aa|x-t|f(t)dt当x取何值时,F(x)取最小值.
Wemadeplansforavisit,but______difficultieswithcarpreventedit.
最新回复
(
0
)