首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Is science infinite? Can it keep giving us profound insights into the world forever? Or is it already bumping into limits? In hi
Is science infinite? Can it keep giving us profound insights into the world forever? Or is it already bumping into limits? In hi
admin
2021-12-15
40
问题
Is science infinite? Can it keep giving us profound insights into the world forever? Or is it already bumping into limits? In his 2011 book The Beginning of Infinity physicist David Deutsch made the case for boundlessness. When I asked him about consciousness, he replied; "I think nothing worth understanding will always remain a mystery. And consciousness seems apparently worth understanding. "
At a meeting I just attended in Switzerland, " The Mystery of Human Consciousness," another famous British physicist, Martin Rees, challenged Deutsch’s optimism. In that essay Rees calls The Beginning of Infinity "provocative and excellent" but disputes Deutsch’s central claim that science is boundless. Science "will hit the buffers (缓冲区) at some point," Rees warns.
There are two reasons why this might happen. The optimistic one is that we clean up and understand certain areas (such as atomic physics) to the point that there’s no more to say. A second, more worrying possibility is that we’ll reach the limits of what our brains can grasp. There might be concepts, crucial to a full understanding of physical reality. Efforts to understand very complex systems, such as our own brains, might well be the first to hit such limits. Perhaps complex collectives of atoms, whether brains or electronic machines, can never know all there is to know about themselves.
The riddle of consciousness is a synecdoche for the riddle of humanity. What are we, really? For most of our history, religion has given us the answer. We are immortal souls, children of a loving god, striving to reach heaven. Most modern scientists reject these religious explanations, but they cannot agree on an alternative. They have proposed a bewildering variety of answers to the question of what we really are.
Science will never resolve these disagreements and converge on a single, true theory of what we are, for two reasons. One is that we will never have a "consciousness meter," an objective means of measuring consciousness in non-human things. The other is that we are too varying, too creative, to be captured by single theory. Science itself keeps transforming us, with technologies as diverse as brain implants, genetic therapy and ideas as diverse as queer theory and integrated information theory. To be human means to be a work in progress.
Deutsch’s claim that science is infinite also has a contradiction at its core. He wants science to solve the deepest mysteries, like consciousness, and yet to have more mysteries to solve, forever. That is a radical assertion about the structure of nature, which to my mind reflects wishful thinking rather than hard-headed realism.
Deutsch is both wrong and right. He is wrong that science can solve every mystery, and especially consciousness. We will never understand, once and for all, who we are. But Deutsch is right that science is potentially infinite, if infinite means never-ending. It is precisely because we can never achieve total self-knowledge that we will keep seeking it forever.
What does the author think of Deutsch’s point of view?
选项
A、Partially acceptable.
B、Completely irrational.
C、Somewhat groundless.
D、Quite encouraging.
答案
A
解析
由题干中的author和Deutsch’s point of view定位到原文最后一段。观点态度题。本题考查作者对多伊奇的观点的看法。在定位段中作者指出,多伊奇的看法有错也有对,错在他认为科学可以解决所有谜题,对在认识到科学的潜力是无限的。可见,作者认为多伊奇的观点有些是可以接受的,故答案为A)。B)“完全不合理”和D)“非常令人振奋”,说法都过于绝对,不符合作者一分为二的分析,故排除;C)“有点缺乏根据”,由原文可知,作者并没有讨论多伊奇的观点的论据问题,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sPx7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
WhylifelonglearningistheinternationalpassporttosuccessA)Pictureyourselfatacollegegraduationday,withafresh
Thefutureofpersonalsatellitetechnologyishere—arewereadyforit?A)Satellitesusedtobetheexclusiveplaythingsof
Apple’sStanceHighlightsaMoreConfrontationalTechIndustry[A]ThebattlebetweenAppleandlawenforcementofficialsoveru
YoumayhaveheardthatCoca-Colaoncecontainedaningredientcapableofsparkingparticulardevotioninconsumers:cocaine.Th
A、Oldpeoplewouldbetakencareofsolelybyunfeelingrobots.B、Humanswouldbetiredofcommunicatingwithoneanother.C、Dig
Whatistheplaceofartinacultureofinattention?RecentvisitorstotheLouvrereportthattouristscannowspendonlyami
TheChallengesforArtificialIntelligenceinAgricultureA)Agroupofcornfarmersstandshuddledaroundanagronomist(农学家
AtthebaseofamountaininTanzania’sGregoryRift,LakeNatronburnsbrightred,surroundedbytheremainsofanimalsthatwe
Theroboticsrevolutionissettobringhumansfacetofacewithanoldfear—man-madecreationsassmartandcapableasweareb
It’swellestablishedthatsmokingcigarettes,especiallylargequantitiesofthem,isbadforyourhealth.Butanewstudyshow
随机试题
对急性肾小球肾炎最为合适的治疗措施是
感染性心内膜炎赘生物,下述哪一项叙述是错误的
患儿,男,6月龄,母乳喂养,每日6~7次,为了保证小儿的营养摄取,护士对家长进行辅食添加的健康指导,正确的是
对于用于允许停电时间为毫秒级,且容量不大又要求直流电源的特别重要负荷要求的应急电源为()。
工程实施准备阶段的进度控制任务是()。
丫口周家鸿两座山对折的地方,就是丫口。村里人荷锄而出,冲着丫口响起渐渐远行的脚步,那其中,必定有苍老的牛,送行的狗。翻过丫口,这一切却又在金色晨光中迷蒙
【2014年北京第24题】下列有关“函”的表述中,错误的是()。
下列气体是人体能够产生的,能发挥抗炎、神经功能调节和血管松弛等作用。但若吸入过量会与血红素结合导致中毒的是()。
设曲线y=x2+ax+b和2y=一1+xy2在点(1,一1)处相切,其中a,b是常数,则().
按照Java的标识符命名规则,下列表示一个类的标识符正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)