首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D. Mark
Read the following article and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D. Mark
admin
2018-05-06
59
问题
Read the following article and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Mark your answer on your Answer Sheet.
To Tweet or Not to Tweet
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying array of companies that barely existed five years ago: Twitter, LinkedIn, Groupon, Yammer, Yelp, Flickr, Ning, Digg — and the list goes on. These companies are mostly private but have attracted the ardent attention of Wall Street and investors, with Facebook now worth a purported $75 billion and Groupon valued at close to $25 billion.
There can be little doubt than these companies enrich their founders as well as some investors. But do they add anything to overall economic activity? While jobs in social media are growing fast, there were only about 21,000 listings last spring, a tiny fraction of the 150 million-member U.S. workforce. So do social-media tools enhance productivity or help us bridge the wealth divide? Or are they simply social-entertaining and diverting us but a wash when it comes to national economic health?
The answers are vital, because billions of dollars in investment capital are being spent on these ventures, and if we are to have a productive future economy, that capital needs to grow the economic pie — and not just among the elite of Silicon Valley and Wall Street. The U.S. retains a competitive advantage because of its ability to innovate, but if that innovation creates services that don’t turn into jobs, growth and prosperity, then it does us only marginal good.
The problem is that these tools are so new that it is extremely difficult to answer the questions definitively. Flash back nearly 20 years and the same questions were being asked about the first Internet wave. Were Netscape and the Web enhancing our economy, or were people just spending more time at work checking out ESPN.com? Official statistics weren’t designed to capture the benefits, and didn’t—until statistics mavens at the Federal Reserve, urged on by Alan Greenspan, refined the way they measured productivity. As a result of these somewhat controversial innovations, the late 1990s became a period of substantial technology-driven gains.
It is possible that the same gap exists today, that social-media tools are indeed laying the groundwork for new industries and jobs but aren’t yet registering on the statistical radar. Many companies believe social media make them more competitive. Ford and Zappos, for instance, use Twitter to market their products and address consumer complaints. Countless corporations have created internal Facebook pages and Yammer accounts for employees to communicate across divisions and regions. Industry groups for engineers, doctors and human-resources professionals have done the same to share new ideas and solutions on a constant basis rather than episodically at conferences. Staffing companies have been especially keen on social media; a senior executive at Manpower told me we should think of social-media tools as today’s version of the telephone.
One big question is what proportion of that benefit will be captured economically by consumers vs. corporations. Sure, social media allow people to compare prices and quality and assess which companies are good to work for and where jobs might be. They also may enhance education and idea sharing, but the caveat is that the people who use these tools are the ones with higher education and income to spend on technology, not the tens of millions whose position in today’s world has eroded so sharply. According to a recent Pew Foundation study, only 45% of adults making less than $30,000 have access to broadband, which is an essential component of using content-rich social media effectively.
And that is the rub. Like so many things these days, social media contribute to economic bifurcation. Dynamic companies are benefiting from these tools, even if the gains are tough to nail down in specific figures. Many individuals are benefiting too, using Linkedln to find jobs and Groupon to find deals. Bui for now, the irony is that social media widen the social divide, making it even harder for the have-nots to navigate. They allow those with jobs to do them more effectively and companies that are profiting to profit more. But so far. they have done little to aid those who are being left behind. They are, in short, business as usual.
Which of the following statements about the social media companies is NOT true?
选项
A、Most of them are private.
B、They are growing fast in value.
C、They are enjoying huge sums of investment.
D、They contribute greatly to workforce market.
答案
D
解析
根据第二段第三句可知“social media companies”提供的就业市场只占美国劳动力市场微小的一部分,所以D是错误表述,正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/sr9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Lookatthefollowingstatement:Beingcreativeisthekeytocareersuccess.Doyouagreeordisagreew
Lookatthefollowingadvertisement.ChinaDailyWewouldliketohearyouropinionsaboutthei
Readthefollowingjobadvertisementintoday’sDailyTelegraph,YouareAnnJonesandwritealetterabout120wordsofapplica
Youareaskedtowriteacompositioninwhichyougiveyourownopinionsonthefollowingtopic:Tea
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
Lookatthefollowingstatement:Beingcreativeisthekeytocareersuccess.Doyouagreeordisagreew
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
随机试题
Youreallyhavetogetveryoldbeforeyourealizeyou’reold.I’minmymiddlefiftiesandIdon’tfeel【C1】______yet.However,
商业银行的提示付款期限为自汇票到期日起()天内。
下列美国人风俗叙述正确的是()。
文明执勤的要点是:谦虚谨慎,( ),礼貌待人,( )。
甲乙两人相约见面,并约定第一人到达后,等15分钟不见第二人来就可以离去。假设他们都在10点至10点半的任一时间来到见面地点,则两人能见面的概率有多大?
如果我们必须用一句话给免疫系统下个定义,答案一定是“识别非我的机制”。这是免疫系统最核心的部分,其余的东西,比如抗体的形成或者巨噬细胞消灭敌人的能力,都必须建立在这个机制之上。换句话说,只要生命体能够将敌人辨认出来,剩下的事情就好办了,目前医学界遇到的最难
皇帝的陵墓集中在一起,形成“陵墓聚集制”,这是从()代开始的。
Aneweconomicspaperhassomeold-fashionedadviceforpeoplenavigatingthestressesoflife:Findaspousewhoisalsoyourb
Inrecentyears,lotsofbigeconomieshavefollowedAmerica’sleadintighteninganti-briberyenforcement.Itisrightthatbri
Iamterriblysorryfor______(忘了提前打电话取消约会).
最新回复
(
0
)