首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
50
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that ______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/srlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Inthesupermarket(人人自助购物).
Lyndandhundredsofyoungpeoplelikehim______thepostoftypist.
RecentstudiesbytheCouncilofEuropeshowthat______.Althoughwealldependontheresourcesofnatureforoursurvival__
(Thereislittlechance)thatmankindwouldsurviveanuclearwar.
Thefoodweeatseemstohaveprofoundeffectsonourhealth.Althoughsciencehasmadeenormousstepsinmakingfoodmorefitt
Memoryistheabilitytokeeptrackofthingsthathavehappenedinthepast.Memoryreallyislearning.Oneneedsmemorytorid
Three______fourpeoplebelievethathavinghealthyteethisveryimportant.
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
随机试题
劳动技术教育的内容有哪些?
阅读《冯谖客孟尝君》中的一段文字,回答问题。后期年,齐王谓孟尝君曰:“寡人不敢以先王之臣为臣。”孟尝君就国于薛。未至百里,民扶老携幼,迎君道中。孟尝君顾谓冯谖曰:“先生所为文市义者,乃今日见之。”冯谖曰:“狡兔有三窟,仅得免其死耳。令君有一窟,未
肝脏不能利用的物质是
70岁,男性患者,表情呆板,动作缓慢,右手不自主震颤,长期服用左旋多巴;同时患有前列腺肥大。近半年出现病情波动,症状多于服药前加重
患者患痫证日久,近期频繁发作,兼见心神不安,心悸,失眠健忘,舌淡苔白,脉滑。治疗应选用
下列各项中,不属于会计职业道德主要作用的是()。
贷款的计息方式有()。
下列建筑工程成本合同形式中。发包方承担了通货膨胀风险,而承包方承担了实物工程量、成本等风险的是()。
EDI常被称作电子贸易或无纸贸易。()
查询客户名称中有"网络"二字的客户信息的正确SQL命令是( )。
最新回复
(
0
)