首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
admin
2010-01-28
44
问题
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page.
•For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D ) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
A school of behavioral economists has long argued that when it comes to money, people are incapable of acting in their own best interest -- that decisions result from impulse and overconfidence as much as from reason. Smart folks, in other words, are just as likely to soon part with their money as all those fools.
The truly bad news is that smart companies are just as prone to make terrible decisions for the same reason. Take one of the biggest business decisions of all— merger. Research consistently shows that most mergers fail in every sense of the word, from falling stock prices to lower profitability after the merger. Yet, even with suffering capital markets, a recent Hewitt Associates study found that more than half of the 70 senior executives and board members surveyed planned to step up merger activity during the next three years.
Why? Call it executive hubris. CEOs are not different from the rest of us in that they fall prey to the self-enhancement bias: we all like to think we are intelligent and efficacious. So we overestimate our abilities. That’s why studies show that significantly more than half of all people believe they are above average -- in negotiating ability, even in income, This overly optimistic view is, of course, worse for CEOs- afar all, they generally are way above average. Btu the result is the same: bad decisions. One study, by business school professors Matthew Hayward and Donald Hambrick, showed that the greater the hubris of the chief executive, the more a company tends to overpay for acquisitions.
The aphorism "Pride goeth before a fall" seems to hold true in business too. When executives are confronted with the appalling statistics, their first response goes something like this: "That may happen to other companies, but not ours. This acquisition will be more successful. We have learned."
The next CEO challenge is persuading a possibly recalcitrant board of directors to let you pursue your urge to merge. Hubris, again, returns to center stage. You paint a picture of doom and gloom that will result if you don’t merge. Take a look at one of the rationales given for the merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, two companies with poor operating track records. The argument was that PCs were becoming a commodity industry, consolidation was inevitable, and if HP didn’t do the consolidating, it would soon be one of the consolidated. Here’s another variant of the same rationale: If you don’t buy the target company, your competitor will -- and you’ll lose out. This gambit uses the influence strategy of scarcity -- we want what we can’t have, and we find particularly desirable anything that we may lose to someone else.
Here’s how to avoid hubris-fueled merger mania. First, follow the adage from medicine: Forgive and remember. Go back and evaluate past merger decisions, admit when you were wrong, figure out why, and learn from it.
Second, beware of too much agreement in the board room. When Alfred Sloan ran General Motors, if he couldn’t find opposition to a decision, he’d postpone it. He interpreted a lack of dissent as a lack of analysis. Find, even encourage, people to disagree with you, so that all sides of the decision are examined. Mostly, we like those who agree with us. But as one of my colleagues likes to point out, if two people agree all the time, one of them is redundant.
The urge to merge is still like an addiction in many companies: Doing deals is much more fun and interesting than fixing fundamental problems. So, as in dealing with any other addiction or temptation, maybe it is best to just say no.
What are we told is the best way to avoid hubris-fueled merger madness?
选项
A、Draw lessons from past merger decisions.
B、Trust those who share opinions with you.
C、Stay far away from merger activities.
D、Try to accept opposing views.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tCKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 CLet’scleanuptheofficefirstanswerswhatshallwedofirst.Choice(A)confusestheoppositeslast
A、 B、 C、 CThesubwayanswerswhatisthefastestwaytogetdowntown.Choice(A)confusestheoppositesslowand
A、 B、 C、 ANo,...inahospitalanswerstheyes/noquestion.Choice(B)confusesthesimilarsoundsbarnandbor
A、 B、 C、 BWedidn’thavetimetotypeitanswerswhytheletterwasnottyped.Choice(A)confusesthewordstype
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopic
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetop
Askingquestions询问
Question询问
随机试题
下列关于二手个人住房贷款的说法,正确的是()。(2010年上半年)
简述学校工作评估的功能。
高温高压灭菌和低温保存生物活性蛋白是()在医疗工作中的应用
用透水性不良的土作为填料时,应控制其含水量在最佳含水量( )之内。
W厂生产的A产品目前的市场份额与最大竞争对手的市场份额的比率(相对市场份额)为1.2,市场成长率为14%。鉴于目前的市场态势,该厂拟调整2017年二季度的生产计划。为此,委托Y咨询公司对该厂所在地区的A产品销售量进行预测。Y公司根据本公司目前仅有的行业统计
交通运输结构是指各种交通运输方式内外部各个方面的构成和联系。其中外部是指各种交通运输方式从适合国民经济整体发展角度出发,对提供的交通运输能力与必须满足的交通运输需求的分工和协作,包括()、各种交通运输方式的线网规模与地区分布、各种交通
简述教师提高知识直观效果的措施。
在眼的结构中,感光辨色最敏锐的部位是()。
()被誉为“空气维生素”,有利于人体的身心健康。
Inthefollowingarticle,somesentenceshavebeenremoved.ForQuestions41-45,choosethemostsuitableonefromthelist[A]-
最新回复
(
0
)