2. 考研
  3. Early this week a bit of cheery news was reported by the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank: black segregation has h

Early this week a bit of cheery news was reported by the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank: black segregation has h

admin2014-09-05  29
问题     Early this week a bit of cheery news was reported by the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank: black segregation has hit its lowest point in more than a century — declining in all 85 of the nation’s largest metropolitan areas. Nevertheless, the report is largely celebratory in tone, and it has been received in that fashion by much of the news media. Before we break out the champagne, however, it may be wise to pause and reflect for a moment on who was excluded from the analysis.
    Our nation’s prison population has more than quintupled(soaring from 300,000 in the mid-1970s to more than 2 million today), due to a "get tough" movement and a war on drugs that has been waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color. Studies have consistently shown that people of color are no more likely to use or sell illegal drugs than whites, but a fierce drug war has been waged nonetheless, and harsh mandatory minimum sentences passed, leading to a prison-building boom unprecedented in world history. Despite this sea change, prisoners continue to be treated as nonentities in much sociological and economic analysis.
    In the Manhattan Institute study, prisoners are not even mentioned, despite the fact that millions of poor people — overwhelmingly people of color — are removed from their communities and held in prisons, often hundreds of miles from home. Most new prison construction has occurred in predominately white, rural communities, and thus a new form of segregation has emerged in recent years. Bars and walls keep hundreds of thousands away from mainstream society — a form of apartheid unlike the world has even seen. If all of them suddenly returned, they would not be evenly throughout the nation’s population. Instead they would return to a relatively small number of communities defined by race and class, greatly intensifying the levels of segregation we see today.
    Those who imagine that the failure to account for prisoners can’t possibly affect the analysis would be wise to consider the distortion of unemployment figures in recent years. According to Harvard professor Bruce Western, standard unemployment figures underestimate the true jobless rate by as much as 24 percentage points for less educated black men. In fact, during the 1990s — the economic-boom years — noncollege black men were the only group that experienced a sharp increase in unemployment, a development directly traceable to the sudden explosion of the prison population. At the same time that unemployment rates were sinking to record low levels for the general population, the true jobless rate among noncollege black men soared to a staggering 42% .
    Prisoners do matter when analyzing the severity of racial inequality in the U. S. Yet because they are out of sight and out of mind, it is easy to imagine that we are making far more racial progress than we actually are. For now, let’s keep the cork in the bottle and pray that we will eventually awaken from our color-blind slumber to the persistent realities of race in America.
The best title for this article perhaps is______.
选项 A、The Myth of Desegregation
B、The Prison Boom in America
C、The Decline of Racial Equality
D、The Distorted News Report
答案A
解析 本文主要讨论的是美国的种族隔离问题，报告显示种族隔离现象已经大面积改善，但是作者却从这份报告中发现了问题，并且做了翔实的论述。[B]只提到了美国的监狱人满为患的问题，丝毫没有涉及种族隔离现象，自然是错误答案。[C]言过其实，作者通篇的论点只是强调曼哈顿报告不够真实，但是作者也并未就此得到“美国的种族隔离现象非但没有改善，反而出现退化”的结论。[D]偷换概念，出现误差的是一个人口数据报告，而不是新闻媒体的报道。只有[A]最能够概括文章的意思。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tDK4777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)