首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
admin
2022-04-28
98
问题
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example, the wealthy oil enclave of Abu Dhabi brags that it has planted more than 130 million trees—each of which does its duty in absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, this artificial forest in the desert also consumes huge quantities of irrigation water produced, or recycled, from expensive desalination plants. The trees may allow its leaders to wear a halo at international meetings, but the rude fact is that they are an energy-intensive beauty strip, like most of so-called green capitalism. And, while we’re at it, let’s just ask: What if the buying and selling of carbon credits and pollution offsets fails to reduce global warming? What exactly will motivate governments and global industries then to join hands in a crusade to reduce emissions through regulation and taxation?
Kyoto-type climate diplomacy assumes that all the major actors will recognize an overriding common interest in gaining harness over the
runaway
greenhouse effect. But global warming is not War of the Worlds, where invading Martians are dedicated to annihilating all of humanity without distinction. Climate change, instead, will initially produce dramatically unequal impacts across regions and social classes. It will reinforce, not diminish, geopolitical inequality and conflict.
As the UNDP emphasized in its report last year, global warming is above all a threat to the poor and the unborn, the "two parties with little or no political voice". Coordinated global action on their behalf thus presupposes either their revolutionary empowerment or the transformation of the self-interest of rich countries and classes into an enlightened "solidarity" without precedent in history. From a rational perspective, the latter outcome only seems realistic if it can be shown that privileged groups possess no preferential "exit" option, that internationalist public opinion drives policymaking in key countries, and that greenhouse gas reduction could be achieved without major sacrifices in upscale Northern Hemispheric standards of living—none of which seems highly likely.
And what if growing environmental and social turbulence, instead of stimulating heroic innovation and international cooperation, simply drives elite publics into even more frenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity? Global intervention, in this unexplored but not improbable scenario, would be silently abandoned (as, to some extent, it already has been) in favor of accelerated investment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first-class passengers. We’re talking here of the prospect of creating green and gated oases of permanent affluence on an otherwise stricken planet.
Of course, there will still be treaties, carbon credits, famine relief, humanitarian acrobatics, and perhaps, the full-scale conversion of some European cities and small countries to alternative energy. But the shift to low-, or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive. And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps 2030, when the combined impacts of climate change, peak oil, peak water, and an additional 1.5 billion people on the planet may begin to seriously threaten growth.
According to the author, which of the following statements is true?
选项
A、International cooperation can help curb environmental and social crisis.
B、Innovation and cooperation in environmental issues are unlikely to happen.
C、Rich countries will possibly seclude themselves from the rest of the world.
D、Investment in environmental conservation will largely increase in selected areas.
答案
C
解析
推断题。题目问的是“根据作者,下面哪一句说法是正确的?”。由文章第四段第一句“And what if growing environmental and social turbulence,instead of stimulating heroic innovation and international cooperation,simply drives elite publics into even more frenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity?”可知:革新与合作有利于环境保护,这与A和B项内容相悖。此外,通过该句还可知:“elite publics”有可能进一步将其与其他人类社会隔离,这与C项内容相符。再由第四段第二句“Global intervention,…would be silently abandoned in favor of accelerated investment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first—class passengers. ”可知:如果不提倡国际干预,投资就会加速流向发达国家,这与D项内容不符。故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tKWd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
WhatkindofsecondaryschooldidDarwinstudyat?
______burningcoal,oilandgasolineareresponsiblefortheglobingwarming?______manyAmericanuniversitiesarecarryingout
WhatcanbecitedtoshowMr.Eliasson’sunderstandingoftotal-immersionart?
______theclimateaffectsthefuturesustainableagriculturaldevelopment?______pollutioncanbecontrolledbyincreasingthe
InBritain,theHouseofCommonsisarepresentativeassemblyelectedbyvotersorelectorsthroughageneralelectionandby-el
Theultra-lowfieldMRIcapturesimagesbyusingfieldsabout______.Whatisthemainadvantageofultra-lowfieldMRIaccordin
Impatiencecharacterizesyoungintellectualworkers.Theywanttomaketheirmark(31).Soit’simportanttoget(32)tothemin
Thehumanspecieshasincreaseditslifespanby______.
Thehumanspecieshasincreaseditslifespanby______.
随机试题
计算
患儿,4个月,主诉因夜惊、夜啼睡眠不安,烦躁易激惹,到保健门诊就医。初步诊断为维生素D缺乏性佝偻病。
北京国际贸易仲裁委员会对于涉港争议进行了仲裁。关于该裁决的执行问题.依1999年最高人民法院《内地与香港特别行政区相互执行仲裁裁决的安排》,下列说法正确的有哪些?()
我国关于外商投资企业的立法,体现了以下原则,其中不正确的是()。
根据代理权产生的根据不同,可将代理分为()。
工厂布置,是指工厂在厂区范围内,对车间(科室)、仓库、设施、厂内运输线路、动力线路、供气管道、三废处理、绿化等各组成部分进行合理安排和组合。下列不属于工厂布置的一项是()。
中国特色社会主义法律体系是以我国全部现行法律规范按照一定的标准和原则划分为不同的法律部门,并由这些法律部门所构成的具有内在联系的统一整体。每一法律部门均由一系列调整相同类型社会关系的众多法律、法规所构成。下列选项中属于独立法律部门的是
Accordingtocertainbeercommercials,thecontemporaryversionofsuccess【B1】______inmovinguptoapremiumbrandthatcosts
制定准确、详细的项目范围说明书是保证项目成功实施的关键,__________一般不属于项目范围说明书的主要内容。
PassageSixWhatdothecompanies’effortstokeeppersonalinformationprivateseemtobe?
最新回复
(
0
)