首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2023-03-07
54
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
The word "backfire" underlined in Paragraph 6 means to _____.
选项
A、go wrong
B、feed back
C、set fire
D、lift up
答案
A
解析
backfire意为“回火,适得其反”,故A“出现问题,出错”与之最接近。由前文第5段倒数第二句看,一些学生看到与死亡有关的吸烟警告,反而吸烟的态度更积极,也即吸烟警告会适得其反,由此也可以推断出backfire的意思。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tXcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Skepticsofhighereducationoftencomplainthatuniversitiesoffertoomanyboringdegreeswithlittlevalueintheworkplace.【
Forthoseseekingtohelptheworst-offinpoorcountries,themobilephonehasbeenamagicwand.Mobile-moneyaccountshavehe
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
Duringthelast15years,theEarth’ssurfacetemperatureroseatarateof0.04℃adecade,farslowerthanthe0.18℃)increase
HowdoyouexplaineconomicsinplainEnglish?TheFederalReserveBankofNewYorkhasbeenansweringthequestionwithaneven
Rememberbooks?Theywerethosepiecesofpaperwithwordsprintedonthem【C1】________inbetweentwo,sometimes,【C2】________cove
Despitehelpingtorecordevents,photoscoulddamageourmemories.Researchersfoundpeoplewhotakepictureshave【C1】________r
InApril,BritishresearchersatUniversityCollegeLondonfoundthat,ratherthantherecommendedfive,sevendailyportionsof
Homesicknessisverycommonamongstudentsawayfromhome–eventhosewhohadpreviouslybeenawayatovernightcamportraveled
随机试题
A、抑制T细胞增殖B、抑制抗体生成C、两者均有D、两者均无皮质激素______。
低渗性脱水时,体液的容量变化特点为
脉压增大时可出现
猪的发情周期一般为
患者小便热赤,尿血鲜红,心烦口渴,夜寐不安,舌尖红,脉数,治疗宜用( )。
患者,女,34岁。平素多忧思抑郁,失眠,心悸,与人争吵后,突然呼吸短促,息粗气憋,胸闷胸痛,咽中如窒,但喉中痰鸣不著,苔薄,脉弦。若患者发作后,出现气滞腹胀,大便秘结,可加用
药品零售企业的行为规则包括()。
某甲自信其酒量超人,不容易醉酒,故虽已喝完一瓶高度数白酒,仍驾驶汽车赶路,途中撞死、撞伤行人各1人。庭审过程中,某甲为自己辩解说,经常喝酒驾车一直无事,这次醉酒后神志不清故而撞人,希望法院能从轻处罚。对此下列表述哪些是正确的?( )
实践基础上的理论创新,是()。
-Tinalooksespeciallyprettytonight.-Yes,shealwayslooksherbestin____dressof____color.
最新回复
(
0
)