首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2023-03-07
85
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
The word "backfire" underlined in Paragraph 6 means to _____.
选项
A、go wrong
B、feed back
C、set fire
D、lift up
答案
A
解析
backfire意为“回火,适得其反”,故A“出现问题,出错”与之最接近。由前文第5段倒数第二句看,一些学生看到与死亡有关的吸烟警告,反而吸烟的态度更积极,也即吸烟警告会适得其反,由此也可以推断出backfire的意思。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tXcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Firstitwaspets,thenfish.Nowit’spoultryandpigs.The【C1】________ofanimalsallowedtofeedoninsectsisgrowing.Anew
AdecadeagobiologistsidentifiedaremoteprotectedareainnorthernLaos,calledNamEt-PhouLouey,asthecountry’sprobable
ForMitchellandSkyeCohen,thethird-generationownersofEconomyCandyinNewYorkCity,theshortperiodbetweenHalloweena
ForMitchellandSkyeCohen,thethird-generationownersofEconomyCandyinNewYorkCity,theshortperiodbetweenHalloweena
"Universalhistory,thehistoryofwhatmanhasaccomplishedinthisworld,isatbottomtheHistoryoftheGreatMenwhohavew
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
Peoplewhousuallychowdownonchillipeppersmayliveforlongerandhaveasignificantlyreducedriskofdyingfromcardiovas
Childrenneedexercise.Parentsoftenworrythat【C1】________timeforathleticsorevenforjustplayingontheJungleJimisgoi
InApril,BritishresearchersatUniversityCollegeLondonfoundthat,ratherthantherecommendedfive,sevendailyportionsof
Thecommunityislaunchingacampaigntoreducenoiseintheareasaroundapartments,manyresidentscomplainthattheycannots
随机试题
编者按一般由()拟稿。
_______的领导者与高的群体生产率和高满意度成正相关。()
【B1】【B12】
属于吡唑酮类非甾体抗炎药的是
男性,25岁。车祸伤1小时。查体:脉搏130次/分,血压86/60mmHg。烦躁不安,发绀,严重呼吸困难,皮肤湿冷,左颈胸部皮下捻发感,气管右移,左胸饱满,左肺呼吸音消失。胸片示左肺完全萎陷。急救处理是
取得报关单位资格的法定要求是()。
流通国债的特征不包括()。
英国的大炮轰开了中国闭关自守的大门,使一些爱国知识分子从“天朝上国”的梦幻中惊醒,一股新思潮萌发了。这一新思潮的核心是()。
下列各项中,不属于静态图像格式的是()。
一位从未在中国生活过的韩国女高中生,通过坚持看中国中央电视台的新闻等途径学习汉语,并在汉语演讲大赛中夺冠。这次在韩国全国高中学生汉语演讲大赛获得第一名的李智妍认为学习汉语的难点在于会话。她演讲的主题是“留学生与汉语水平考试”。据韩国《中央日报》报
最新回复
(
0
)