首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When a Massachusetts biotech company recently declared that its researchers had cloned human embryos, it conjured up scary image
When a Massachusetts biotech company recently declared that its researchers had cloned human embryos, it conjured up scary image
admin
2011-01-02
26
问题
When a Massachusetts biotech company recently declared that its researchers had cloned human embryos, it conjured up scary images for many people: bad science-fiction movies, Hitler’s twisted ambitions, rows and rows of identical humans.
But, like most things in life, the truth is a lot more complicated, more subtle.
The announcement drew a storm of criticism. Ethicists, religious leaders and US President Bush denounced Advanced Cell Technology for going too far. Scientists charged that the experiment was hyped and called it a failure.
The news put a spotlight on the field of cloning, from work with animals to researchers’ efforts to use cloning to create tissues for people suffering from debilitating and fatal diseases.
At its most basic level, cloning means creating copies, and in many ways, cloning has been around a long time. When someone cuts a shoot off a green spider plant and re-pots it, that person is creating a clone. Scientists clone or copy genetic material, or DNA, to match suspects to crimes. By copying cells, researchers have been able to create and test drugs. Scientists even use cloning techniques to create copies of the human gene for insulin to help make insulin for people with diabetes.
"Cloning per se is not bad. The ability to clone and make lots of copies of DNA molecules and cells is part of the entire biological revolution and all sorts of good stuff," sags Larry Goldstein, professor of cellular medicine at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine.
Cloning a whole animal or a human being, however, is a much more difficult proposition, even without considering the moral implications. The basic method sounds deceptively simple. Scientists allow an egg to mature in a culture dish. They strip out the genetic material from this egg. Then they insert the genetic material of a separate cell, an adult cell. Next, using a chemical mixture or electrical stimulation, researchers trick the egg into thinking it has been fertilised by sperm. This will activate the cell to start dividing.
Essentially, scientists are trying to reprogramme the egg to create a new organism. It’s an excruciatingly difficult process. During the past several years, scientists around the world have used this method to clone animals. They’ve created about a half-dozen different species, including the famous first sheep, Dolly, along with cows, mice, goats and pigs. Experts say these cloned animals could offer a great deal, from herds that produce more milk, to genetically modified animal organs that could be used for transplantation in humans, and even to cattle that lack the gene that makes them susceptible to mad cow disease.
But it has been a tough process. For each species, scientists have had to work out subtle variations on the basic cloning steps, including how to treat the donor cell and what type of stimulation to use to spark the egg to start dividing. Still, fewer than 1% of these cloned embryos produce live offspring.
Even those born alive have abnormalities--some become obese very quickly, some suffer neonatal respiratory failure. Those that die do so suddenly, and scientists can’t figure out why.
There is no consensus about what is going wrong in these experiments or why, except that something must be awry in the genetic reprogramming. But almost all scientists agree that aside from the moral debate, cloning hasn’t been perfected enough to try in humans.
Professor Larry Goldstein may agree on all of the following statements EXCEPT______.
选项
A、we need to make good use of cloning
B、we need to incorporate cloning into the biological revolution
C、cloning is not intrinsically good or had
D、the ability to clone can offer us exclusively good stuff
答案
D
解析
本文第六段引用了Larry Goldstein的话。第一句:Cloning per se is not bad.意思是“克隆本身并不是坏事。”因而c是他的观点。同时这句也暗示我们应该好好利用克隆技术,所以A也是他的观点。第二句说明了克隆技术是整个生物革命的一部分,因而B也是他的观点。最后一句中的and all sorts of good stuff并不意味克隆只有利而无弊。因此应该选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tilO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Itisn’texpectedtostartnibblingawayatcomputerdatasystemsuntilthedocksclickoverto2000,butthemillenniumbughas
Societywasfascinatedbyscienceandscientificthingsinthenineteenthcentury.Greatbreakthroughsinengineering,theuseo
A、toomuchexerciseoftenleadstoashorterlifespanB、Americanfootballistooviolenttobegoodforone’shealthC、toexerc
BeforegoldandsilverwerebroughttoEuropefromfileSpanishandPortuguesecoloniesinLatinAmericaduringthesixteenthce
Materialculturereferstothetouchable,material"things"--physicalobjectsthatcanbeseen,held,felt,used--thataculture
Whiteneighborhoodsarebecomingdarkerin【1】______andmoreexpensive.【1】______Analystssaythatsoaringhousepricesandboom
Mr.Bascombwasupset.Attimeslikethishewishedhehadneverbecomeacandidateformayor.Everythinghadgonewronglythat
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyhavefoundthattoomuchexerciseisbadforyouand
Thesameonewordmayhavemorethanonemeaning.Thisiswhatwecall______.
A、declared100federallawsunconstitutionalB、declaredover1,000statelawsand100federallawsunconstitutionalC、defendedc
随机试题
气体灭火系统防护区的划分应根据封闭空间的结构特点和位置来划分,其中防护区围护结构及门窗的耐火极限均不宜低于()h。
小细胞低色素性贫血可见于
A.任脉B.督脉C.带脉D.冲脉E.阴维脉曲骨、阴交均属于()
管理学上著名的马太效应来自一个故事:一个国王在远行前交给甲、乙、丙三个仆人每人一锭银子,并吩咐他们去做生意。国王回来时。奖励给甲10座城邑,因为他赚了10锭银子;奖励给乙5座城邑,因为他赚了5锭银子。等到听说丙将那锭银子包在手绢里一直没有拿出来时,国王怒不
今年美国大选中,媒体频繁曝出候选人希拉里.克林顿的身体抱恙:满脸疲惫,剧烈咳嗽,步履蹒跚需要人搀扶,甚至当街晕倒。不论媒体背后的动机是什么,此类报道的确使选民质疑希拉里的身体状况能否胜任总统的工作。而后,希拉里对“健康门”报道做出反应,在谈话节目中表演徒手
根据解释的效力,可以把刑法解释分为()(2014年一专一第2题)
计算机网络利用通信线路将不同地理位置的多台独立的__________的计算机系统连接起来,以实现资源共享。
以下关于C语言数据类型使用的叙述中错误的是
在16位编译系统上,若有定义“inta[]={10,20,30},*p=&a;”,当执行“p++;”后,下列说法错误的是()。
某考试网站的主页地址是http://localhost/web/index.html,打开此主页,浏览“公务员考试”页面,查找“公务员报名特别注意”页面内容,并将它以文本文件的格式保存到考生文件夹下,命名为“1jswks07.txt”。
最新回复
(
0
)