首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Turning Brownfields into Greenbacks Inactive industrial sites are transforming into productive facilities. Brownfields a
Turning Brownfields into Greenbacks Inactive industrial sites are transforming into productive facilities. Brownfields a
admin
2013-03-11
24
问题
Turning Brownfields into Greenbacks
Inactive industrial sites are transforming into productive facilities.
Brownfields are industrial sites whose future use is restricted because of real or perceived pollution. The number of brownfield sites tins grown exponentially during the, past 25 years. The growth curve has reached epidemic proportions-as many as 650,000 brownfield sites exist in the United States today.
Both the public and private sectors realize the problem cannot continue to grow unchecked.
More of the impetus for redevelopment comes from state and local governments, which is not surprising since the brownfield epidemic directly affects thousands of U.S. communities. Many of these impacts are so serious that they threaten fiscal and social health of communities. Brownfield sites frequently result in a decreased tax base, urban blight, loss of infrastructure, suburban sprawl, the depletion of farmland and a loss of employment opportunities. State and local governments are more directly affected by these problems than their federal counterpart.
Although the impact is felt most strongly at the state and local levels, federal legislation is largely responsible for the brownfield phenomenon. In particular, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act’s (CERCLA) onerous (繁重的) provisions have induced thousands of property owners, lenders and prospective purchasers to shun industrial property.
Theoretically, various provisions allow owners and lenders to avoid liability. Unfortunately, two of the primary ways to avoid liability are fraught with difficulty. Both the innocent landowner defence and the security interest exemption (免除) contain ambiguous language that is troubling to the members of the regulated community they were designed to protect.
The ambiguity, coupled with CERCLA’s draconian liability scheme, has created a vacuum. Existing owners, prospective purchasers and lenders have become alert to industrial properties. Hundreds of thousands of moderately troubled properties sit idle because of the threat of CERCLA liability. These sites constitute the nation’s approximately 650,000 brownfields. Until recently, prospective purchasers, lenders and tenants have had no reason to risk CERCLA liability by becoming involved in brownfield sites-but things are beginning to change. Federal and state governments have taken steps to encourage private parties to revitalize brownfields. An important plank in both federal and state programmes are provisions that limit owner and lender liability.
Federal Initiatives
The federal government has revised its policy on prospective purchaser agreements—contracts between the EPA and buyers of contaminated sites. The EPA originally published its Prospective Purchaser Guidance in 1989. At that time its policy was to avoid entanglements in what it viewed as private real estate deals. Since then, the number of inactive industrial sites has increased dramatically. State and local governments across the country complained loudly about the impact the sites were having on the economic and social health of their communities. The EPA now makes it easier for prospective purchasers to quantify their cleanup obligations by executing a prospective purchaser agreement.
Other important initiatives included in EPA’s Brownfield Action Agenda were the Underground Storage Tank Lender Liability Rule and Owners of Property Containing Contaminated Aquifers Guidance.
State Initiatives
Many states have enacted Voluntary Cleanup Programmes (VCPs), designed to encourage the reuse of dormant industrial sites. Most VCPs offer mechanisms that limit owner liability for those not contributing to the sites’ environmental problems.
Some VCPs allow regulators to enter into covenants not to sue, which provides owners with the ability to quantify their environmental obligations to regulators.
The state EPA agrees not to sue the owner/covenantee as long as it performs the cleanup which it agrees to. Without a cap on liability, investors steer clear of brownfield sites.
Cleanup Financing
Legislators and regulators have provided a variety of mechanisms to limit tile liability of those contemplating purchasing, leasing or lending money on brownfield properties. The problem is that the parties remain alert to brownfield sites. Their attitudes are based on sound logic.
Greenfields are properties not previously used or despite previous use that have no real or perceived contamination. Prospective brownfield developers are aware that they can avoid the complications inherent in a brownfield acquisition by acquiring greenfields.
Private industry typically will only consider brownfield deals that offer exceptional upside potential.
To date, the most important breakthroughs in brownfields have been the liability limitations.
Unfortunately, these provisions merely put the owner or lender in the same position they would be in with a greenfield development. These parties are also keenly aware that they will have to spend large amounts of money on legal, engineering and other professional help to get to the same place.
Why should a developer or corporation spend time and money on a brownfield redevelopment?
In some instances, brownfield properties offer exceptional investment opportunities. Many brownfields are available at a steep discount largely attributable to "stigma equity". Stigma equity is created when the sale price and the cleanup cost are less than the uncontaminated value of the site.
Finance is becoming more important in the environmental field, largely due to the decrease in enforcement actions. Environmental agencies across the United States are under budgetary pressures. Until recently, many remediation projects were undertaken solely because of the command and control system, meaning ’~you do or else". The fines and penalties contained in various environmental statutes and regulations were sufficiently punitive to coerce action by a significant percentage of the regulated community. Recently, legislators and regulators have been leaning away from the command and control model. They recognize there is simply not enough manpower to rely exclusively on the paradigm.
Incentives have been introduced to encourage companies to voluntarily take environmentally friendly actions. In particular, brownfields are now the focus of legislative and regulatory initiatives designed to spur private industry to clean up the environment.
Potential Market
Brownfield redevelopment constitutes one of the largest potential markets for environmental vendors (卖主). Environmental vendors must help their clients pay for remediation costs. Firms that help clients generate cash flow will be more successful than other technically competent organizations that choose to ignore the issue.
Environmental vendors can ally themselves with organizations offering brownfield financing.
These relationships can work both ways the financing firms frequently come across cleanup projects that require a broad array of expertise. Consequently, they may be able to reciprocate (回报).
Voluntary Cleanup Programmes
Many states have enacted voluntary cleanup programmes with a wide array of provisions, including finds to investigate and remedy brownfields, and stale money for prospective purchasers to investigate the environmental condition of a property.
This type of funding is important because it provides investors with strong motivalion to investigate sites that were previously thought to harbour significant levels of pollution.
Once a prospective purchaser discovers that a site is relatively clean, the deal is much more likely to proceed. Many salvageable sites would lay fallow (休耕的) without this state funding.
Finance is becoming increasingly important in tile environmental field, largely because of______.
选项
答案
the decrease in enforcement actions
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/tpu7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Haveyouever【B1】______whatotherpeopledowiththeiroldcomputers?Inthepasttheyhaveoftenpaidhighpricesfortheirol
YadinneededhundredsofpeopletohelphimbecausethepalaceofMasadawashugeandtheworkwasdifficult.Yadinextendan_
A、Byturningordinaryiceintosteam.B、Bypassingsteamoverdryice.C、Byheatingdryice.D、Bymixingdryicewithordinaryi
IsHigherEducationaBubble?MycolleagueatDemocracyinAmericadrawsattentiontoanongoingdebateoverthenatureofh
IsHigherEducationaBubble?MycolleagueatDemocracyinAmericadrawsattentiontoanongoingdebateoverthenatureofh
A、Thepresenceoflife-formsfarbelowtheEarth’ssurface.B、Theriskofinfectionfromrarestrainsofbacteria.C、Fictionalr
A、Becauseofthesizeandcompositionoftheiraudience.B、Becauseoftheirdiverseandlivelyprograms.C、Becauseadvertisingi
Childrenhavebeensaidtohavebrain-injuredchildsyndrome,hyperactive(极度活跃的)childsyndromeandattention-deficitdisorder(AD
Doyoufindgettingupinthemorningsodifficultthatit’spainful?Thismightbecalledlaziness,butDr.Kleitmanhasanew【
Badteethcanbepainful—andworse.Theycanevenbedeadly.Infectionsofthegumsandteethcanreleasebacteriaintothebloo
随机试题
简述我国现行的欠薪支付保障措施。
某企业开发出一种新产品,单位成本为1000元。根据以上资料,回答下列问题:如果该企业希望获得20%的利润率,那么该产品定价为()元,这种定价方法被称为()。
下列属于细胞坏死主要标志的是
关于浸润性生长的叙述,正确的是
患者,男,30岁。骑车时跌倒,右手撑地,腕部肿痛,活动障碍,检查初步诊断为舟状骨骨折。如果腕关节正侧位X线片未见明显异常,对确立诊断最为简单适用的检查是
某企业扩大投资的资金来源如下:企业历年积累2000万元,外商投资1000万元,5年期银行贷款3000万元,年息6%,上市发行股票2000万元,发行4年期债券2000万元,年息5%。银行借款手续费、股票、债券发行费支出总计100万元。企业筹资费用率为(
适用于“会”和“不会”之间没有质的区别,或运动技术难度不高而没有必要进行分解的运动项目的教学方法是()。
古希腊哲学家曾经说过,世上最美好的事物是言论自由。谁能自由如风,谁就能风行天下;自由地做喜欢的事,喜欢的事才有价值。关在笼子里的鸟,最大的梦想是吃喝;带着枷锁的人,最高的期待是挣脱。思想自由是最高的人格独立,国家梦和个人梦有一个共同前提:自由的社会自由的人
阅读下列材料。回答问题。2013年10月11日晚,王某酒后在某酒店酗酒闹事,砸碎店里玻璃数块。此时某区公安分局太平派出所民警任某执勤路过酒店,任某欲将王某带回派出所处理,王某不从,与任某发生推搡。双方在扭推过程中,任某故意将王某推倒,王某头撞在水泥
地球表面大约有70%的面积被水覆盖,水的总量约有13.6亿立方公里,其中淡水所占比例很小,可利用的淡水资源约占水总量的( )。
最新回复
(
0
)