首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
President Clinton’s decision on Apr. 8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement on China’s entry into the
President Clinton’s decision on Apr. 8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement on China’s entry into the
admin
2010-03-19
37
问题
President Clinton’s decision on Apr. 8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement on China’s entry into the World Trade Organization seemed to be a massive miscalculation. The President took a drubbing from much of the press, which had breathlessly reported that a deal was in the bag. The Cabinet and White House still appeared divided, and business leaders were characterized as furious over the lost opportunity. Zhu charged that Clinton lacked "the courage" to reach an accord. And when Clinton later telephoned the angry Zhu to pledge a renewed effort at negotiations, the gesture was widely portrayed as a flip-flop.
In fact, Clinton made the right decision in holding out for a better WTO deal. A lot more horse trading is needed before a final agreement can be reached. And without the Administration’s goal of a "bullet-proof agreement" that business lobbyists can enthusiastically sell to a Republican Congress, the whole process will end up in partisan acrimony that could harm relations with China for years.
THE HARD PART. Many business lobbyists, while disappointed that the deal was not closed, agree that better terms can still be had. And Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin, National Economic Council Director Gene B. Sperling, Commerce Secretary William M. Daley, and top trade negotiator Charlene Barshefsky all advised Clinton that while the Chinese had made a remarkable number of concessions, "we’re not there yet," according to senior officials.
Negotiating with Zhu over the remaining issues may be the easy part. Although’ Clinton can signal U. S. ’approval for China’s entry into the WTO himself, he needs Congress to grant Beijing permanent most-favored-nation status as part of a broad trade accord. And the temptation for meddling on Capital Hill may prove over-whelming. Zhu had barely landed before Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss) declared himself skeptical that China deserved entry into the WTO. And Senators Jesse A. Helms (R-N. C. ) and Emest F. Hollings (D-S. C. ) promised to intro4uce a bill requiring congressional approval of any deal.
The hidden message from these three textile-state Southerners: Get more protection for the U. S. clothing industry. Hoping to smooth the way, the Administration tried, but failed, to budge Zhu on textiles. Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, and Detroit. Zhu refused to open up much of the lucrative Chinese securities market and insisted on "cultural" restrictions on American movies and music. He also blocked efforts to allow U. S. auto makers to provide fleet financing.
BIG JOB. Already, business lobbyists are blanketing Capitol Hill to presale any eventual agreement, but what they’ve heard so far isn’t encouraging. Republicans, including Lott, say that "the time just isn’t right" for the deal. Translation: We’re determined to make it look as if Clinton has capitulated to the Chinese and is ignoring human, religious, and labor rights violations; the theft of nuclear-weapons technology; and the sale of missile parts to :America’s enemies. Beijing’s fierce critics within the Democratic Party, such as Senator Paul D. Wellstone of Minnesota and House Minority leader Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, won’t help, either.
Just how tough the lobbying job on Capitol Hill will be become clear on Apr. 20, when Rubin lectured 19chief executives on the need to discipline their Republican allies. With business and the White House still trading charges over who is responsible for the defeat of fast-track trade negotiating legislation in 1997, working together won’t be easy. And Reptjblicans-with a wink say that they’ll eventually embrace China’s entry into the WTO as a favor to Corporate Amcrica. Though not long before they torture Clinton. But Zhu is out on a limb, and if Congress overdoes the criticism, he may be forced by domestic critics to renege. Business must make this much dear to both its GOP allies and the White House: This historic deal is too important to risk losing to any more partisan squabbling
The main idea of this passage is ______.
选项
A、The Contradiction between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party
B、On China’s entry into WTO
C、Clinton was right
D、Business Lobbyists Control Capitol Hill
答案
C
解析
主旨题。文章是从商人的角度来看待中国加入WTO,他们希望从谈判中获得更多的利益,而克林顿的同意或不同意的日的都是和他们相符的争取更多利益。这篇就是从四方利益最终趋向一致“同意中国加入世贸”来证明“总统结沦正确”的中心思想。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uD9K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Geographyisstudyoftherelationshipbetweenpeopleandtheland.Geographerscompareandcontrast【C1】______placesontheear
Geographyisstudyoftherelationshipbetweenpeopleandtheland.Geographerscompareandcontrast【C1】______placesontheear
WhywastheUnitedStatescalleda"meltingpot"?
Whatdoesthepassagemainlydiscuss?
TheInternetbeganinthe1960sasasmallnetworkofacademicandgovernmentcomputersprimarilyinvolvedinresearchfortheU
Tolearnwithsuccessisnotaverydifficulttaskofsomefundamentalprinciples【C1】______tobeitsbases.【C2】______discussi
Withkeen______,convincingfactsandaglobalangle,EpsteinvividlyrecordedabrilliantpageofthegreatChineserevolution.
Theathleticprogramisexpectedtobringpublicitytotheschool,attractstudents,fosterstudentunity,andencouragealumni
Thatanecologicalcrisisconfrontshumankindisnowsocentraltoourthinkingthatthenotionthathumanbeingsadapttotheir
Asteachersweshouldconcernourselveswithwhatissaid,notwhatwethink______.
随机试题
车深孔时,为防止车刀杆因悬伸及过长而产生变形和振动,应采取哪些措施?
下列作品、作家、朝代、文本对应全部正确的一项是( )
属于脂肪动员产物的是属于脂肪组织中合成甘油三酯原料的是
男性,62岁,上颌义齿使用两年,近感义齿松动,有食物滞留基托内,咀嚼时痛,昨日折断。查:可摘局部义齿(缺失),基托正中折断,其中有一块基托丢失,腭隆突较大,伸长。根据患者的主诉,义齿修理完毕后,不必要的处理是
某厂工人,男,58岁,从事高分子聚合物生产,工龄20年。最近因神经衰弱、肝区痛入院检查,经查体确诊为肝血管肉瘤。该名工人的工种可能是
背景材料:某公路工程所需的主要建材有路基土方填料、砂石材料、水泥、沥青材料、沥青混合料和钢材等。所有材料均由项目部自己采购和组织运输。项目部材料采购部门拟按工程量清单→材料供应计划→材料用量计划→材料用款计划→材料采购计划的顺序进行材料计划管理,并对几种
银行监管的依法原则是指监管活动除法律法规需要保密的,应当具有透明度。()
根据以下资料,回答问题。注:2006年北京市总人口数为1197.6万人,2007年为1213.3万人,2008年为1229.9万人。与2007年相比,2008年北京市60—69岁的老年人多了()。
下面叙述中错误的是()。
Shouldwecareifover150knownspeciesofanimalshave【1】fromtheearthinthelastfiftyyears?Shouldwebeconcernedthatt
最新回复
(
0
)