首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Charter School Lottery Gambles with Kids’ Futures It seems like every time I turn over a charter school rock, some unpleasan
Charter School Lottery Gambles with Kids’ Futures It seems like every time I turn over a charter school rock, some unpleasan
admin
2013-02-17
64
问题
Charter School Lottery Gambles with Kids’ Futures
It seems like every time I turn over a charter school rock, some unpleasant fact crawls out. That’s how I felt after watching "The Lottery", a new documentary about the Harlem Success Academy and its leader, Eva Moskowitz. Like Davis Guggenheim’s "Waiting for Superman", this film addresses the failures of the traditional public school system, in this case zeroing in on a New York City public charter school and the challenges it faces. (Guggenheim offers a broader picture of charter schools in the nation’s capital and around the country.)
Some of the facts spotlighted in "The Lottery" just bugged me, especially this one: Unlike schools that select their students according to merit, or public schools that must accept everyone, charter schools that have more applicants than spots available select students by public lottery (intended to prevent families from buying their way in) .The film profiles four really likable kids who are convinced that they’ll beat the odds and win one of the 475 spots that 3,000 kids seek, enabling them to attend the sparkling charter school with its fancy computers and Ivy League-educated teachers.
Although all four could be chosen (a lottery is, after all, random), we have a sinking feeling that they all won’t be. Moreover, it becomes painfully clear early on that lottery winners gain a ticket to success, while the losers are doomed to an inferior public school education. Or so the film would have us believe.
If we had to choose one word to describe the state of public education in the United States, that word would be "failed. " The statistics paint a horrific picture: 68 percent of eighth-graders can’t read at their grade level; more than 6,000 students quit every school days; and almost half of all dropouts under age 24 don’t have a job. That failure costs us billions in lost wages, productivity and tax revenue.
Anything we could do to reverse that would be welcome. And such a turnaround is what the two-decade-old taxpayer-funded charter school movement, with 1. 5 million students, is all about. President Obama has great faith in charter schools. Congress allocated $ 4.35 billion to his education initiatives, including the Race to the Top (RTTT) competition that financially rewards states if, among other things, they promote charter schools and evaluate teachers according to student achievement (Tennessee just received $ 500 million from this program) . The president has threatened to veto a recently approved spending bill over cuts to these initiatives that Rep. David Obey (D-Wis.) inserted.
Not everyone shares Obama’s enthusiasm. Leigh Dingerson, education team leader at the Center for Community Change, agrees that charter school innovations offer a tremendous benefit. But, as she plainly told me, "it is a benefit only to those who benefit from it." Students who aren’t chosen through the lottery are "sent to a ’school of last resort’ where the kids know they have landed in ’the dumping grounds.’"
Others view charter schools as attempts to break the powerful teachers unions. It’s in this fierce environment that "The Lottery" throws its firebombs. The film is about much more than how a charter school chooses its students. It’s also about how to remove ineffective or incompetent teachers from the public school system.
Director Madeleine Sackler reveals the emotions swirling around her subject. She filmed protesters from the now-disbanded liberal activist group ACORN demonstrating outside the non-union Harlem Success Academy; she shows a highly emotional parent screaming at Moskowitz while a young child cowers nearby; and she shows teachers union head Randi Weingarten struggling to tell interviewer Charlie Rose why only a handful of New York City’s tens of thousands of tenured public school teachers have been fired.
After abortion and health care, there’s probably no subject that generates as much division today as education reform and teachers unions. Why else would PD’s editor-in-chief Melinda Henneberger ask, as she recently did on Woman Up’s weekly talk show: "When did we put the American Federation of Teachers equal with al-Qaeda (基地组织)?"
That’s a good question. Charter school advocates insist they are not antiunion , and that they are just trying to bring innovation and competition into the public school system. As Deborah Veney Robinson, vice president of communications at the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, told me, "We’re not pro-union or anti-union. We’re pro-kid. "
Indeed, charter schools are helping to make the public school system better than it has ever been. But, based on the facts as presented in "The Lottery," I have several concerns:
Unions
The Harlem Success Academy says it does not hire union teachers so it can focus on improving student performance. But there is no correlation between said performance and attendance at unionized or non-unionized schools. The HSA can rightly be proud that 95 percent of its third-graders’ scored as proficient or higher on standardized tests, but students at the unionized Renaissance Charter School scored even higher.
Performance
The academic performance of charter schools is decidedly mixed. A June report from the Department of Education finds: "Among charter schools popular enough to hold lotteries, overall, our results suggest that they are no more successful than nearby traditional public schools in boosting student achievement. " A 2009 report from Stanford University found that only 17 percent of charter schools performed significantly better than traditional public schools, while 37 percent of charter schools performed worse.
There are other, related issues that concern me, though admittedly they apply to all schools, not just charter ones:
Testing
Many parents feel that testing deadens a love of learning. Alesia Dun-combe, a mother of four in Corvallis, Ore. , explained her fears about testing elementary school children: "My biggest concern... was the focus on testing and test results," she told me in an e-mail. "I really did not want my kids to be labeled at that time, nor did I want them to focus on getting good test scores. Instead, I wanted them to feel the intrinsic value of knowing something, to want the reward of growing their own capabilities. I did not want them to judge their efforts based on other’s metrics. "
Cheating
I worry that if higher student test scores translate into job security for teachers, then some teachers will do whatever it takes, including cheating, to push those scores higher. This concern is not merely hypothetical: Teacher cheating spiked (剧增) upward in the 400,000-student Chicago public school system after test scores were used to evaluate teacher performance.
The saddest part about "The Lottery" comes at the end. As we suspected all along, not all of the kids profiled are lucky enough to gain admission to the prized school with its fancy computers, newly painted floors and extra tutoring.
So, what does the film teach us? Unfortunately, it doesn’t teach us that children should study hard and try to gain admission to a magnet school or that their parents should push their teachers — at whatever school children attend- to do their job. No, it teaches that kids must rely on luck or "the hand of God" to make their dreams come true. That approach is not going to change America’s failing public school system. Instead, it will just perpetuate the divide between those lucky enough to get a good education and those who come up empty.
The film "The Lottery" teaches children that they must rely on luck to______.
选项
答案
make their dreams come true
解析
定位句提及,它教给孩子们必须依靠好运或“上帝之手”来实现自己的梦想,其中it指代题干中的The film“The Lottery”,题干中teaches children that they must rely on luck to与定位句中teaches that kids must rely on luck or“the hand of God”to部分对应,题干缺少的是依靠好运来做什么,由此可推知题干空格处应填入make their dreams come true。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ufI7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayonthetopicofShouldSchoolsOfferHandwritingLessons?.You
StudentswhoenteredlotteriesandwonspotsinNewYorkCitycharterschoolsperformedbetteronstateexamsthanstudentswho
A、Shehasfinishedherwork.B、Sheistooexhaustedtowork.C、Herkidswillarrivehomeafterschool.D、Themandoesnotaskhe
A、Hewenttoafamousschool.B、Hewastaughtbyhismother.C、Hewastaughtbyhisfather.D、Hisparentsemployedagoodteache
BringOurSchoolsoutofthe20thCenturyThere’sadarklittlejokeexchangedbyeducatorswithanopposingtrace:RipVan
BringOurSchoolsoutofthe20thCenturyThere’sadarklittlejokeexchangedbyeducatorswithanopposingtrace:RipVan
BringOurSchoolsoutofthe20thCenturyThere’sadarklittlejokeexchangedbyeducatorswithanopposingtrace:RipVan
BringOurSchoolsoutofthe20thCenturyThere’sadarklittlejokeexchangedbyeducatorswithanopposingtrace:RipVan
随机试题
企业的某台设备原值为100万元,当期及以前期间计税时允许扣除的折旧为30万元,目前该设备尚有6成新,公允价值为45万元,该设备的计税基础是()
不适用高压蒸汽灭菌法的物品是()。
[2009年第110题,2008年第104题,2007年第99题]评价电能质量主要根据哪一组技术指标?
【2009年真题】根据《国务院关于投资体制改革的决定》,只需审批资金申请报告的政府投资项目是指采用()方式的项目。
阅读案例,回答问题。一次,我安排了“为乐曲起名字”的活动。我播放了《大海》和《空山鸟语》两首音乐给大家听,要求同学们各抒己见,发挥创造力给它们取名字。于是,“流水欢歌”“清泉”“清澈的溪水”“雨中的邂逅”“舞”“争执”“百鸟争鸣”等名字诞生了。特别引起
下列句子中,加下划线的词语古今意义相同的一项是()。
基础研究,指的是一种并未考虑其实际应用性,而源于我们深入自然和人类的激情的科学研究。本世纪的许多最有实际意义的发现之所以能够实现,是因为学者们不是出于追求发明创造的实用性,而是探索自然界的基本知识。今天人类遗传基因领域内的进步可以追溯到近半个世纪以前DNA
人们越来越重视人与自然的和谐关系,“取法自然又超越自然的深邃意境”和“咫尺之内再造乾坤”指的是:
蒙田说:“初学者的无知在于未学,而学者的无知在于学后。”意思是说,第一种无知是连字都不识,当然谈不上有学问;第二种无知却是错读了许多书,反而变得无知。“初学者”的无知容易辨别、也容易避免;但是“读书读得越多越好”的错误观点似乎更能迷惑人,因此有必要审慎选择
A、Hehastoplaybetterthanothers.B、Heneedsonlytowaitforhisturn.C、Heneedstobeapopularperson.D、Hemustbevery
最新回复
(
0
)