首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, ta
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, ta
admin
2023-01-17
25
问题
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, taxpayers who wish to should be able to read about it without further expense. And science advances through cross-fertilization between projects. Barriers to that exchange slow it down.
There is a widespread feeling that the journal publishers who have mediated this exchange for the past century or more are becoming an impediment to it. One of the latest converts is the British government. Recently it announced that, the results of taxpayer-financed research would be available, free and online, for anyone to read and redistribute.
Britain’s government is not alone. Soon the European Union followed suit. In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NM, the single biggest source of civilian research funds in the world) has required open-access publishing since 2008. And the Wellcome Trust, a British foundation that is the world’s second-biggest charitable source of scientific money, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also insists that those who receive its support should make their work available free.
Criticism of journal publishers usually boils down to two things. One is that their processes take months, when the Internet could enable them to take days. The other is that because each paper is like a mini-monopoly, which workers in the field have to read if they are to advance their own research, there is no incentive to keep the price down. The publishers thus have scientists—or, more accurately, their universities, which pay the subscriptions—in an armlock. That, combined with the fact that the raw material (manuscripts of papers) is free, leads to generous returns. In 2011, Elsevier, a large Dutch publisher, made a profit of £768 million on revenues of £2.06 billion—a margin of 37 percent. Indeed, Elsevier’s profits are thought so
egregious
by many people that 12,000 researchers have signed up to boycott the company’s journals.
Publishers do provide a service. They organize peer reviews, in which papers are criticized anonymously by experts (though those experts, like the authors of papers, are seldom paid for what they do). They also
sort the scientific sheep from the goats
, by deciding what gets published, and where. That gives the publishers huge power. Since researchers, administrators and grant-awarding bodies all take note of which work has got through this filtering mechanism, the competition to publish in the best journals is intense, and the system becomes self-reinforcing, increasing the value of those journals still further.
But not, perhaps, for much longer. Support has been swelling for open-access scientific-publishing: doing it online, in a way that allows anyone to read papers free of charge. The movement started among scientists themselves, but governments are paying attention and asking whether they might also benefit from the change.
Much remains to be worked out. Some fear the loss of the traditional journals’ curation and verification of research. Even Sir Mark Walport, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a fierce advocate of open-access publication, worries that the newly liberated papers have ended up in different places rather than being consolidated in the way they want.Arevolution, then, has begun. Technology permits it; researchers and politicians want it. If scientific publishers are not trembling in their boots, they should be.
The author mentions the concerns of Sir Mark Walport, who________.
选项
A、strongly supports current publishing arrangements and models
B、worries about the poor quality of current scientific publication
C、believes that the weaknesses of open-access journals can easily be overcome
D、is afraid that good papers in open-access journals may be neglected
答案
D
解析
本题问马克.华尔波特爵士的担忧。文中第7段最后一句提到,华尔波特爵士担心那些免费公开的文章可能没法如我们所期待的那样得到整合,而是出现在不同的地方,因此D项“担心发表在免费公开期刊上的好论文会被忽略”符合文意。A项“强烈支持目前的出版安排和模式”,与文意相反,文中说的是他支持变革,因此A项排除。B项“担心目前出版物质量不好”,文中无提及,排除。C项“认为期刊开放权限所带来的的缺点可轻易被克服”,也不符合文意中他的担忧,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vCcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Nobodyeverproteststhatanelementaryschoolshouldbedescribedas"manned"insteadof"staffed,"butdaretosuggesta"men
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
Happypeopleworkdifferently.They’remoreproductive,morecreative,andwillingtotakegreaterrisks.Andnewresearchsugge
Happypeopleworkdifferently.They’remoreproductive,morecreative,andwillingtotakegreaterrisks.Andnewresearchsugge
Readthefollowingtextandmatcheachofthenumbereditemsintheleftcolumntoitscorrespondinginformationintherightco
Amtrak—thelargestrailwaycompanyintheU.S.—wasexperiencingadeclininginridership.【C1】________majorconcernstoAmtraka
"Beforetheoperation,IwouldlookatsomeoneandallIcouldseefortheirfacewasjelly,"saysJonathanWyatt."Now,Ican
"Beforetheoperation,IwouldlookatsomeoneandallIcouldseefortheirfacewasjelly,"saysJonathanWyatt."Now,Ican
随机试题
社会工作者通过个别访谈,倾听居民在接受服务或参与活动中的个人感受及体会,了解居民对社区社会工作服务方案的意见和建议以及方案实施过程中应注意的问题。这一工作过程属于()。
有关放大摄影的叙述,错误的是
胃脘胀痛,嗳腐吞酸,多见于胃脘胀痛、吞酸嘈杂,胸胁闷胀,多见于
脾气虚证与脾阳虚证鉴别要点是
赵女士,停经50天,阴道出血2天,量如月经,下腹部坠痛。检查:子宫增大如孕40天大小,宫颈口已扩张,见有胚囊堵塞于子宫颈内口。首先考虑为()
有助于肝癌早期诊断的实验室检查是
根据国务院有关规定,购房时享受税收优惠政策的普通住房应满足的条件之一为单位单套建筑面积在()平方米以下。[2007年考试真题]
建立账套。(1)账套信息账套号:106账套名称:吉顺科技有限公司启用会计期:2014年1月(2)单位信息单位名称:吉顺科技有限公司单位简称:吉顺科技(3)核算类型行业性质:小企业会计制度账套主管:王艳(4)
下列说法中,正确的是().
下列关于BGP协议的描述中,错误的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)