首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
admin
2011-12-20
107
问题
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinctive activity. No other discipline has produced as much in such a short period. It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time, but for sheer industry, the business school deserve credit. Not a day goes by without another wave of research papers, books, articles, and journals.
In these terms, schools have produced a generally accepted theoretical basis for management. When it comes to knowledge creation, however, they find themselves in difficulties. They are caught between the need for academic rigour and for real-world business relevance, which tend to pull in opposite directions. The desire to establish management as a credible discipline leads to research that panders to traditional academic criteria. The problem for business school researchers is that they seek the approval of their academic peers rather than the business community. In the United States this has led to the sort of grand ’paper clip counting’ exercises that meet demands for academic rigour but fail to add one iota to the real sum of human knowledge.
Business schools have too often allowed the constraints of the academic world to cloud their view of the real world. Business school researchers seek provable theories rather than helpful theories. They have championed a prescriptive approach to management based on analysis and, more recently, on fashionable ideas that soon disappear into the ether. The one best way approach encourages researchers to mould the idiosyncrasies of managerial reality into their tightly defined models of behaviour. Figures and statistics are fitted into linear equations and tidy models. Economists and other social scientists label this cure smoothing. Meanwhile, reality continually refuses to cooperate.
Central to this is the tension between relevance and rigour. In a perfect world, there would be no need to choose between the two. But in the business school world, the need to satisfy academic criteria and be published in journals often tilts the balance away from relevance. In other words, it is often easier to pursue quantifiable objectives than it is to add anything useful to the debate about management. To a large extent, the entire business school system works against useful, knowledge-creating research. Academics have five years in which to prove themselves if they are to make the academic grade. It seems long enough. But it can take two or even three years to get into a suitable journal. They therefore have around three years, probably less, to come up with an area of interest and carry out meaningful and original research. This is a demanding timescale. The temptation must be to slice up old data in new ways rather than pursue genuinely groundbreaking, innovative research.
It is a criticism also made by some business school insiders. "Academic journals tend to find more and more techniques for testing more and more obscure theories. They are asking trivial questions and answering them exactly. There has to be a backlash," says Julian Birkinshaw of London Business School. In large part, the problem goes back to a time when business schools were trying to establish themselves. Up until the 1960s, American business schools were dismissed as pseudo-academic institutions, including the universities of which they often formed a part, regarded them as a little more than vocational colleges. Since then, most of the leading schools have undergone major reassessments and introduced sweeping changes. However, it is questionable whether those changes have gone far enough.
What do we learn about business schools in the last paragraph?
选项
A、They are reluctant to admit to failings.
B、They resent criticism of their academic journal.
C、They used to be looked down on by other institutions.
D、They are comfortable with the current situation.
答案
C
解析
最后一段倒数第三句 “...American business schools were dismissed as pseudo-academic institutions…regarded them as a little more than vocational colleges.”,可以得出商业学校曾被认为是“伪科学机构”、“比职业院校稍好一点”,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vDua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
cooperativerelationship
TheShapeofThingstoComeWhentheworldwasasimplerplace,therichwerefat,thepoorwerethin,andright-thinkingpeople
RustbeltStates
researchethics
()referstothestudyofsocialaspectsoflanguageanditsrelationwithsociety.
中非合作论坛(ForumonChina-AfricaCooperation,简称FOCAC),是中华人民共和国和非洲国家之间在南南合作范畴内的集体对话机制,成立于2000。论坛的宗旨是平等【R21】________、增进了解、扩大【R22】_____
Mencannotmanufacturebloodasefficientlyaswomencan.Thismakessurgeryriskierformen.Menalsoneedmoreoxygenbecause
Youaresupposedtowriteacompositionofatleast150wordsonthefollowingtopic.Promises
ManyUnitedStatescompanieshave,unfortunately,madethesearchforlegalprotectionfromimportcompetitionintoamajorline
______,hedoesgetirritatedwithhersometimes.
随机试题
每个岗位式回火防止器只能供____使用。
直接标价法的特点是()
初产妇,26岁,40周妊娠,因规律宫缩6小时入院。胎心监护提示胎心基线160次/分,伴有早期减速,B超提示脐带绕颈1周。阴道检查:胎头位置坐骨棘上1cm,宫口开大3cm,胎膜未破,估计胎儿体重3300~3500g,骨盆测量正常。此时应立即采取何种措施不
MRI适用于人体任何部位检查,在中枢神经系统颅脑、脊髓的应用最具优势。颅脑MRI增强扫描静脉注射钆对比剂剂量一般为
患者,男,30岁。以右下颌后牙肿痛两日就诊,检查颊侧龈明显肿胀隆起,根分叉区有牙周袋约5mm,内有脓液,叩痛,松动I度,考虑诊断为
哪项措施用于肝硬化食管静脉破裂出血治疗是错误的
女,60岁,上腹胀痛伴恶心、呕吐2天,右下腹痛阵发加剧、腹胀半天。查体:T38.3℃,P120次/分,BP150/90mmHg。全腹压痛(+),右下腹明显,有肌紧张,肝浊音界存在,未闻及肠鸣音。实验室检查:WBC13.0×109/L,N0.88。
下列哪个指标表达土抵抗压缩变形能力的?()
受社会文化影响较少的能力是()。
Although the bulk of industry resources and energies have focused on developing the fastest(11)or slickest(12), more and more mi
最新回复
(
0
)